Hard News by Russell Brown

Read Post

Hard News: Onwards and upwards

214 Responses

First ←Older Page 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 Newer→ Last

  • Sam F,

    As far as I'm aware, we operate under exactly the same broadcasting standards as apply to Radio New Zealand. Or is there some section of the Broadcasting Act that established a different, lower bar for commercial radio I should start exploiting now?

    Just to clarify, I didn't mean that (for instance) talk radio inherently has lower standards than TV1 and should be treated more leniently as such. Breaches of good taste, decency and so on can happen anywhere, but my point was that you might wish a national state-owned broadcaster to be particularly sensitive to these issues and perhaps even try to set some kind of standard.

    I am trying to envisage some kind of moral guest boycott of Breakfast, or other shows with similar issues. All I can imagine is either the host reduced to slagging off some poor soul in the paper (or on FaceYouTubeSpace), or soul-destroying slagging matches between the host and whatever emptyheaded publicity junkies come to fill the gaps that more reasoned commentators have decided to leave unfilled.

    Wouldn't it be better and more productive to arrange things such that guests don't need to worry about completely outrageous personal attacks when they appear on public TV?

    Auckland • Since Nov 2006 • 1611 posts Report

  • Gareth Ward,

    Regards to Onwards and Upwards, wasn't Backbenches fascinating last night? Jeanette was her usual stoicly accurate self, Dr Cullen managed to keep it pretty factual and good natured and still pop in his old "we did that" sales pitch, Sir Roger just yelled at everyone in the end and Stephen Franks was baseless and offensive.
    So not fascinating at all I suppose... =)

    Auckland, NZ • Since Mar 2007 • 1727 posts Report

  • Graeme Edgeler,

    why do you suspect that?
    is this programme subject to a lower set of standards under the regulations? (versus other news and current affairs/interview programmes. etc.)

    No.

    1. This wasn't news/current affairs - not everything Breakfast TV does is current affairs - and the balance standard only applies to current affairs/factual-type material. If they're contrasting Tim Tams with Mint Slice (both Arnott's), Griffins can't complain that there was no balance because Toffee Pops didn't get a look-in.

    1b. Even if the balance standard did apply, the coverage was balanced - they presented both sides - those who thought it noteworthy, and those who thought it offensive. Everyone got their say, and people watching could make their own mind up (which is what the balance standard is aimed at)

    2. As George notes "Good Taste and Decency" isn't aimed at this type of material - it's mostly about gratuitous violence or sex - really offensive material, not this. Complaints under this heading are almost never upheld - except to the extent that the material wasn't preceded by a an appropriate warning - "the footage in the following news story includes ... etc."

    Wellington, New Zealand • Since Nov 2006 • 3215 posts Report

  • stephen walker,

    1b. Even if the balance standard did apply, the coverage was balanced - they presented both sides - those who thought it noteworthy, and those who thought it offensive. Everyone got their say, and people watching could make their own mind up (which is what the balance standard is aimed at)

    so broadcasting sexist, insulting, ridicule is ok as long as you have a panel on hand in which some are in favour of and some are opposed to the public humiliation of an interviewee based on their appearance but not the news-related interview?

    nagano • Since Nov 2006 • 646 posts Report

  • George Darroch,

    so broadcasting sexist, insulting, ridicule is ok...?

    No, those things are covered by section 6 f and 6 g of the code.

    WLG • Since Nov 2006 • 2264 posts Report

  • philipmatthews,

    I wasn't saying that the item in question breached fairness, balance, good taste and decency; rather that these are qualities that one would more readily expect from a state-owned broadcaster than a commercial radio network in the US or Ian Wishart's magazine, to use two examples cited. Both Limbaugh and Wishart have well-known, clearly signalled bias and play or publish to narrow audiences; One News is expected to have no biases and to reach mass audiences. And for all its infotainment trappings, this show is still part of the publicly-funded news division of TVNZ.

    And Craig: Jonathan Ross was never purporting to be a news co-host; the prank call to Andrew Sachs was during Russell Brand's radio show. Sure, it was on the BBC but not on a news programme. Clearly there is a difference. I've never heard the show that you, Damien and Russell do so I wouldn't know if it carries the same level of journalistic responsibility that a show like Breakfast should.

    Christchurch • Since Nov 2007 • 656 posts Report

  • Kyle Matthews,

    Yes, and I wouldn't get too high and mighty about the moral superiority of state-owned broadcasters.

    I care not whether they're morally superior. Just that the state broadcaster should follow the standards set out in the BSA. Which they didn't appear to do this morning.

    The person going on should have those expectations that they'll be treated professionally. That wouldn't be the case if Obama went on Limbaugh's radio show, because their systems are different.

    Since Nov 2006 • 6243 posts Report

  • Sacha,

    There's a huge difference between a market with only two shows to choose from and the situation in the US of A.

    Mr Henry is an indefensible dick and even though I suspect a helping of ADHD comes into the picture, I don't think much of those who support him or employ him when there are talented alternatives.

    Ak • Since May 2008 • 19745 posts Report

  • philipmatthews,

    Again with the Jonathan Ross example, I would be hugely impressed if TVNZ had the balls to suspend Paul Henry as the BBC did Ross and Brand while it "investigated" the incident. Doubt it will happen though.

    Christchurch • Since Nov 2007 • 656 posts Report

  • Sacha,

    I would be hugely impressed if TVNZ had the balls to suspend Paul Henry

    I don't recall ever seeing something like that on our tv, so I sure hope something happens to him. The closest might be poor Dennis Connor being baited by that other over-rated buffoon. At least Kofi Annan was only referred to in his absence.

    Ak • Since May 2008 • 19745 posts Report

  • Robyn Gallagher,

    Give them the YouTube link

    It is, after all, TVNZ who edited the thing together and put it on YouTube.

    The Broadcasting Standards Authority's jurisdiction does not extend to the internet. So if you complain about a clip you saw on YouTube or even the broadcaster's website, the BSA can't rule on it. It has to be in relation to the original broadcast on TV or radio.

    Since Nov 2006 • 1946 posts Report

  • Graeme Edgeler,

    so broadcasting sexist, insulting, ridicule is ok as long as you have a panel on hand in which some are in favour of and some are opposed to the public humiliation of an interviewee based on their appearance but not the news-related interview?

    No. It's just not imbalanced.

    I noted on a comment a while back that I thought a complaint that the material was unfair - particularly under guideline 6f (I think 6g is a bit of a stretch) had good prospects.

    The Broadcasting Standards Authority's jurisdiction does not extend to the internet. So if you complain about a clip you saw on YouTube or even the broadcaster's website, the BSA can't rule on it. It has to be in relation to the original broadcast on TV or radio.

    Yes. Complain about the broadcast. When they ask you what time and aspect of the broadcast, use the on-line video as a guide - I'm complaining about the bits in this YouTube video ... when they aired.

    Wellington, New Zealand • Since Nov 2006 • 3215 posts Report

  • Ben Gracewood,

    I only watch the bit with the brilliant gadget guy. Cos he's awesome.

    Ignoring the nepotism for a moment (but I always love a good nep!), I get more comments about Paul's interruptions and strange comments than I do about the actual gadgets.

    He's a fairly normal guy in person (for a given range of "normal"), but I do get the impression that you need a particular personality type to be a "light entertainment" host in this country

    Orkland • Since Nov 2006 • 168 posts Report

  • andin,

    He's a fairly normal guy in person (for a given range of "normal"), but I do get the impression that you need a particular personality type to be a "light entertainment" host in this country

    Yes, normal hmmmm. Is normal in the eye of the beholder.
    Is normal even something worth aspiring to anymore?
    Are the cultural parameters of normal becoming distorted or does the new normal include a dose of perceived anti PC, a childish poking of teh tongue saying " Ooooh look that person isnt Normal."

    Or maybe hes just

    an indefensible dick and .........
    a helping of ADHD comes into the picture

    raglan • Since Mar 2007 • 1891 posts Report

  • Ben Gracewood,

    Is normal even something worth aspiring to anymore?

    Yes, this is what I was hinting at. "Normal" for cultured lefties is suburbs away from "normal" for league-obsessed westies.

    Orkland • Since Nov 2006 • 168 posts Report

  • Stewart,

    Oi!!! Watch it, Gracewood or I'll publicly ridicule your facial hair. ;-)

    Te Ika A Maui - Whakatane… • Since Oct 2008 • 577 posts Report

  • ScottY,

    What Stewart said

    Grrr!

    West • Since Feb 2009 • 794 posts Report

  • Sacha,

    league-obsessed westies

    .. have no more sympathy for rude effete tossers than any other demographic.

    Ak • Since May 2008 • 19745 posts Report

  • Danielle,

    Yeah. I have a lot of Qualities O' Bogan (westie, own a Subaru Impreza and a big-ass dog etc), but a douche is a douche is a douche. To paraphrase Gertrude Stein.

    Charo World. Cuchi-cuchi!… • Since Nov 2006 • 3828 posts Report

  • Don Christie,

    own a Subaru Impreza

    Wannabe - where's ya Holden?

    Wellington • Since Nov 2006 • 1645 posts Report

  • Matthew Poole,

    Wannabe - where's ya Holden?

    On blocks, in the front yard, where it should be :P

    Auckland • Since Mar 2007 • 4097 posts Report

  • Stewart,

    If Danielle is referring to Paul Henry as teh recurrent douche, I'd just like to say, as a bit of a westie, that I am in full and complete agreement of her assessment.

    And if you weren't referring to him as a douche-bag, Danielle, then I really think you should have.

    I had no idea that he had been the beaten candidate when Georgina Beyer won her seat, but if I ever happen to meet said "gentleman" I look forward to really giving him some serious crapola about it.

    Te Ika A Maui - Whakatane… • Since Oct 2008 • 577 posts Report

  • Danielle,

    Paul Henry: Recurrent Douche


    It could be the title of his biography!

    Charo World. Cuchi-cuchi!… • Since Nov 2006 • 3828 posts Report

  • Jolisa,

    Or epitaph for his career?

    Auckland, NZ • Since Nov 2006 • 1472 posts Report

  • Ben Gracewood,

    Oh crap. Apparently I have come across all troll-ey towards Westies. Some of my best friends are westies...

    Actually, I was brought up in South Auckland, so I'm not claiming to be a born-and-bred westie, but I live in Te Atatu (Peninsula), and am planning to buy tickets for next weekend's home game against the Rabbitohs.

    And as a software guy, I prefer Recursive Douche.

    Orkland • Since Nov 2006 • 168 posts Report

First ←Older Page 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 Newer→ Last

Post your response…

This topic is closed.