<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: Quite the Two-Step</title>
		<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Public Address</copyright>
			
			
			

			
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37362#post37362</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37362#post37362</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:54:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37363#post37363</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37363#post37363</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Well &ndash; he has a sense of humour, at least:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjYv2YW6azE" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjYv2YW6azE</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:54:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37366#post37366</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37366#post37366</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Well &ndash; he has a sense of humour, at least:</p></blockquote><p>That's <em>weird</em> ...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:11:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danyl Mclauchlan</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37370#post37370</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37370#post37370</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The Huckabee phenomenon is interesting on a number of levels; his economic policy is all over the place &ndash; he wants to abolish income tax &ndash; but in general he genuinely appears to be the 'compassionate conservative' George W pretended to be, and is an advocate of large-scale state based?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:25:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JP Hansen</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37371#post37371</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37371#post37371</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"Home, home on the range <br />Where the deer and the antelope play"</p><p>Can't get more American than that! Well, unless you're shooting the deer and antelope.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:28:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37372#post37372</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37372#post37372</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>but in general he genuinely appears to be the 'compassionate conservative' George W pretended to be, and is an advocate of large-scale state based solutions to social and economic problems</p></blockquote><p>So long as that solution isn't "let's have another great big war".</p><p>Something that just occurred to me about Iraq.?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:30:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37373#post37373</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37373#post37373</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>"Home, home on the range<br />Where the deer and the antelope play"</p></blockquote><p>It does seem that on Bush's Range, discouraging words are seldom heard.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:32:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37374#post37374</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37374#post37374</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						and besides &ndash; that mixing of deer and antelope &ndash; that's just gonna have to stop right there when the christian right take over ...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:38:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37375#post37375</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37375#post37375</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Something that just occurred to me about Iraq. The received wisdom that war is good for the economy seems to have been completely forgotten.</p></blockquote><p>Not  as much as the "we're saving the women of Iraq from  the Islamic extremists" rationale has been forgotten.</p><p>But there's <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hZnCkP0LBfeyJAVTm6fjlcmGOiUwD8TE7EI80" target="_blank">a reason for that</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:39:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37376#post37376</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37376#post37376</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The only thing that differentiates him from the left is that he feels the solutions should all be 'faith based'.</p></blockquote><p>And being fervently anti-abortion and opposed to gay marriage. He talks about a 'culture of life' but</p><blockquote><p>When asked what Jesus would do about the death penalty: "Jesus was too?</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:48:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Conor Roberts</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37377#post37377</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37377#post37377</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I've been watching Huckabee for a while now. He is very interesting.</p><p>I think he'll win Iowa, as 40% of the Republican voters are evangelical Christians and he is an ex-preacher. Also the evangelicals know how the somewhat odd Iowa caucus system works?</p><p>Huckabee has spent around $9 per vote?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:59:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>LegBreak</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37378#post37378</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37378#post37378</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Is Huckabee his real name?</p><p>It just seems so perfect?.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:14:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37379#post37379</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37379#post37379</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Ha ha. Now answer the bloody question, how do you reconcile being 'pro life' and 'pro death'? He wants Creationism taught in schools, but believes science has proved bumblebees can't fly, and uses that as a metaphor for his campaign.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/12/chris_comer_on_science_friday.php" target="_blank">Check this out</a>. The director of the school science curriculum?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:15:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37380#post37380</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37380#post37380</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>He wants Creationism taught in schools...</p></blockquote><p>he won't be interrested then in <a href="http://jhfowler.ucsd.edu/genetic_basis_of_political_cooperation.pdf" target="_blank">The Genetic Basis for Political Participation</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:22:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37382#post37382</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37382#post37382</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>If science had proved Huckabee can't be POTUS it might make sense.</p><p>I still think Creationism has a place in schools &ndash; at least one class in which the 20 most famous creation myths are placed side by side. If it's treated in an anthropological way, it's just another branch?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:24:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37383#post37383</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37383#post37383</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Don't worry &ndash; this whole thing will stop being an issue when Destiny take over the govt .....
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:28:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37384#post37384</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37384#post37384</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>PS: And don't forget to vote for the Public Address Word(s) of the Year 2007.</p></blockquote><p>Would a little alphabetical action have hurt too much? Hours I tell you, hours!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:40:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37389#post37389</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37389#post37389</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>On the other side of the race, Hilary's in some trouble.</p></blockquote><p>And the failure of Operation Barbarossa was some trouble for the Third Reich.  Ok, that's an overwrought analogy but is her campaign loaded with Obama sleeper agents?  </p><p>And before anyone accuses me of being a partisan Hillary-hater, WTF can?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:04:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37391#post37391</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37391#post37391</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Believe it or not, if I was American I'd change my voter registration to Democrat just so I could cast a primary vote for Obama. Not a flawless candidate by any stretch of the imagination, but forget all this crap about 'Is America ready for a black President' and ask?</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:11:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37392#post37392</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37392#post37392</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Believe it or not, if I was American I'd change my voter registration to Democrat just so I could cast a primary vote for Obama.</p></blockquote><p>A friend of mine is considering doing just that. She voted for Bush twice, and now can't bring herself to choose any of the current?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:12:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37393#post37393</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37393#post37393</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>His main whoopsie with potential Democrat voters so far has been failing to put sufficient distance between him and a preacher who claims to have been cured of homosexuality.</p></blockquote><p>He did get there in the end. In fact, his speech on this made quite an impression with me, as it?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:15:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37395#post37395</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37395#post37395</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Is America &ndash; and the world &ndash; ready for a President who can be mistaken for an adult with the lights on?</p></blockquote><p>well I think Bill Clinton qualified in that category and The World at the time was full of talk about  evil America was. So maybe this time round?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:18:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37396#post37396</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37396#post37396</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Ha ha. Now answer the bloody question, how do you reconcile being 'pro life' and 'pro death'?</p></blockquote><p>Well, to be fair Emma it isn't only right-wingers trying to position themselves as moderates who start spinning more fudge than Willie Wonka on speed when asked that question.  Seriously, what do think?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:24:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37397#post37397</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37397#post37397</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>well I think Bill Clinton qualified in that category and The World at the time was full of talk about evil America was. So maybe this time round with a Dem pres the world will be ready to ditch all the crap about imperialism.</p></blockquote><p>I don't think <em>everyone</em> thought that.?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:25:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37399#post37399</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37399#post37399</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Well, to be fair Emma it isn't only right-wingers trying to position themselves as moderates who start spinning more fudge than Willie Wonka on speed ...</p></blockquote><p>Heh. Your best colorful metaphor in ages Craig.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:26:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37400#post37400</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37400#post37400</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>... Sensible Sentencing Trust spokesman (and new National Party candidate for Wigram) Marc Alexander.</blockquote>That would be <a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0712/S00087.htm" target="_blank">former</a> Sensible Sentencing Trust spokesman Marc Alexander.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:37:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37401#post37401</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37401#post37401</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh, I agree with you, Craig, I just don't think it changes the fact that when Huckabee is asked the question right out, he should answer the fecker, instead of being congratulated for glibly dodging it. And I know, I know, lots of politicians don't answer questions, but when you're?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:38:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37402#post37402</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37402#post37402</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I don't think everyone thought that.</p></blockquote><p>not everyone but it works both ways. If the world wants a more reality based Pres then perhaps the world's criticism of the US should be a bit more reality based  &ndash; when Clinton was in office a lot of it wasn't.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:41:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37403#post37403</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37403#post37403</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>well I think Bill Clinton qualified in that category and The World at the time was full of talk about evil America was. So maybe this time round with a Dem pres the world will be ready to ditch all the crap about imperialism.</p></blockquote><p>I think that very much depends?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:41:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37404#post37404</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37404#post37404</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>On the topic of Black:</p><p>Like I said on the Guardian blog, I don't think people like that should go to jail. Jail should be for violent crime, mostly.</p><p>Instead, he should be bankrupted for the rest of his life and deprived of all assets and income. The next 10?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:43:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37405#post37405</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37405#post37405</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>His main whoopsie with potential Democrat voters so far has been failing to put sufficient distance between him and a preacher who claims to have been cured of homosexuality.</p></blockquote><p>There's also the whole subtext about whether he's 'black' enough, but that's the kind of political pathology I can only handle?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:46:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>LegBreak</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37406#post37406</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37406#post37406</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>On the topic of Black:</p><p>Like I said on the Guardian blog</p></blockquote><p>I haven't checked today, but would it be fair to see there's a healthy element of glee there at the moment?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:56:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>MikeE</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37407#post37407</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37407#post37407</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Russ, the link to mine is dead...</p><p>Its supposed to be.</p><p>Also, its moved down from 22, to number 28 on the order paper &ndash; Banderton must be stewing. </p><p>The Correct link is:</p><p>also heres some good quotes:</p><p>    ?It breeds disrespect for the law when &ndash; and usually we are?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:05:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>MikeE</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37408#post37408</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37408#post37408</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sorry link is:</p><p><a href="http://mikeenz.blogspot.com/2007/12/bzp-ban-delayed-untill-at-least.html" target="_blank">http://mikeenz.blogspot.com/2007/12/bzp-ban-delayed-untill-at-least.html</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:05:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37409#post37409</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37409#post37409</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Russ, the link to mine is dead...</p></blockquote><p>Arrggh. Sorry. There was a stray space in there. Fixed now.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:11:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37410#post37410</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37410#post37410</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>When asked what Jesus would do about the death penalty</p></blockquote><p>Sorting out the SNAG Jesus from the hell fire and brimstone Jesus is a tricky task. On the one hand he exhorts his flock to adhere to existing laws &ndash; which included the death penalty &ndash; but on the other?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:18:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37411#post37411</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37411#post37411</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Well, to be fair Emma it isn't only right-wingers trying to position themselves as moderates who start spinning more fudge than Willie Wonka on speed when asked that question. Seriously, what do think would happen to either Clinton or Obama if they stood up and said "I support abortion on?</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:19:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Martin</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37412#post37412</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37412#post37412</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If the world wants a more reality based Pres then perhaps the world's criticism of the US should be a bit more reality based &ndash; when Clinton was in office a lot of it wasn't.</p></blockquote><p>Fair comment. We didn't hear the same level of noise in the 90's when US?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:47:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Terence Wood</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37413#post37413</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37413#post37413</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>His main whoopsie with potential Democrat voters so far has been failing to put sufficient distance between him and a preacher who claims to have been cured of homosexuality.</p></blockquote><p>For what it's worth, Obama has made a couple of real woopsies:</p><p>1. Buying into [[http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/why-barack-why/|untrue conservative talking points on Social?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:50:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37415#post37415</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37415#post37415</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>As a person who normally (eventually) finds a moral philosophy/reason to back up how I feel about things, I've never been able to find that on life/death &ndash; at least consistently across the whole spectrum. The best I've ever come up with is "this feels right/wrong", which isn't exactly the?</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:24:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37417#post37417</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37417#post37417</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I had a good read through everyone's stances at <a href="http://www.ontheissues.org/default.htm" target="_blank">On The Issues</a>, and it seems that the only Democratic candidate who is against the death penalty is Kucinich. Who has not a hope in hell, but can at least be comforted by his disturbingly hot wife. You can do a?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:33:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37418#post37418</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37418#post37418</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						How did you manage to get dual citizenship for the US? I thought that was not allowed?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:45:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37420#post37420</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37420#post37420</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						As I understand the rules, it's allowed if you're a citizen of both countries by birth/descent: with a Cajun father and a mother from Invercargill, I can legally have both. Dual citizenship is only a no-no if you, as a US citizen, 'swear allegiance' to another country. So my husband,?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:51:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37422#post37422</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37422#post37422</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'm not sure that's true any more, Danielle- I think there was a supreme court case in the 80s relating to draft-dodger who took out Canadian citizenship, and then successfully sued to get his US citizenship rights as well.<br />But I'm too lazy to find out for sure.<br />Voting for?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:07:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37423#post37423</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37423#post37423</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						According to Wikipedia you used to lose US citizenship if you were naturalized in another state, but that had no legal basis and doesn't happen any more.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:15:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Martin</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37424#post37424</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37424#post37424</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>. So my husband, born and raised in Texas, could not become a NZ passport-holder without renouncing his US citizenship.</p></blockquote><p>Aaah.. off the top of my head,NZ doesn't ask that one renounces any previously held citizenship when getting NZ citizenship. The Americans may see it differently.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:17:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37425#post37425</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37425#post37425</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Are you saying, Rob, that the man in the US Consulate in Auckland lied to me? I feel so betrayed. </p><p>The tubes are helpful: I see that the Department of State has <a href="http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1753.html" target="_blank">a wishy-washy policy</a> on deliberate dual citizenship: you don't necessarily lose your US citizenship unless you show?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:31:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Testcard</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37427#post37427</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37427#post37427</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>One question:</p><p>Will <strong>Iowa ?s Huckabee</strong> replace <strong>Howard's End</strong> as the pun-crazed sub-editor's headline of choice?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:51:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Testcard</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37428#post37428</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37428#post37428</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hmmm. Doesn't look much like a heart.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:52:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37430#post37430</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37430#post37430</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm not sure if your vote being worth next to nothing is any different in Texas to anywhere else. I vote more because I feel obliged to than because I think it matters. The  other 99.999% of your life when you are not voting surely counts towards your political influence?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:57:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37432#post37432</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37432#post37432</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Conrad Black gets six and a half years in prison. Good.</p></blockquote><p>Nice to see that some jurisdictions take massive fraud seriously.</p><p>I mean, 12 months home detention with allowances for working? Isn't that pretty much normality for, say, any law-abiding person with a young family?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:01:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37434#post37434</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37434#post37434</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'd say the man at the consulate told you exactly what they told me at the embassy in Wellington, years ago. It's not the whole legal truthy thing. But then, WE <em>don't torture anyone- do we!</em>   Actually,  I think the law has moved on and most people don't know it.?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:11:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37436#post37436</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37436#post37436</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm not sure if your vote being worth next to nothing is any different in Texas to anywhere else. I vote more because I feel obliged to than because I think it matters.</p></blockquote><p>I do feel that my vote in New Zealand matters much more. We are a more democratic?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:41:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37440#post37440</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37440#post37440</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And how could we forget Ron Paul: Can't quite make up my mind whether <a href="http://www.comicmix.com/news/2007/12/10/presidential-candidate-ron-paul-picks-his-super-hero-favorite/" target="_blank">this</a> is charmingly nerdy or flat out weird. (Hat-tip: Andrew Sullivan)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:56:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>LegBreak</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37442#post37442</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37442#post37442</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I can offer no rational explanation, but there?s something a bit off about Obama.</p><p>Although his message is different, there?s a bit too much of the Nerd Chic (think Key and Rudd) about him.</p><p>Note: I make this observation very much from the armchair.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:26:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37448#post37448</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37448#post37448</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I wonder how a primary system would work in NZ. If you're a registered Democrat, you can still vote Republican, right? What stops people registering for somebody elses party and voting for the most useless candidate. Like, I could register as a Nat and vote for Bob "Bollox" Clarkson as?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:11:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>rodgerd</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37450#post37450</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37450#post37450</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Romeny: The candidate who's declared a <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/andrew_sullivan/article3021127.ece" target="_blank">war on the secular state</a>.  It's only religious fascism when Muslims want it, I guess.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:34:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37451#post37451</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37451#post37451</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If you're a registered Democrat, you can still vote Republican, right?</p></blockquote><p>Rich &ndash; it depends on the state.</p><p>There are open primaries &ndash; anyone can vote in any primary.</p><p>There are closed primaries &ndash; you can only vote with your registration.</p><p>There are semi-closed primaries &ndash; independent/unaffiliated voters can choose,?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:48:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37452#post37452</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37452#post37452</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yes, but in all cases, American's can vote against their registration in the final Presidential election, can't they? So a moderate Republican who decided the adopted candidate was too extreme/mad/dumb could vote Democrat. </p><p>And a registration is just that &ndash; it isn't like joining a party, being accepted and paying?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:54:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37453#post37453</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37453#post37453</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>I do feel that my vote in New Zealand matters much more.</em></p><p>It's the feeling that counts I guess. Our electorate vote is still FPP so I get the Texas experience by being in Mt Albert Electorate. The proportional thing is certainly more representative nationally, but where a Texan might?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:56:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37457#post37457</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37457#post37457</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>At the end of the day it's the party vote that really matters though. Labour could field candidates that were so shitty they lost most of their electorates, but if the party vote held up, then they'd get list MPs to compensate.</p><p>And that's as it should be. We vote?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:22:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37458#post37458</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37458#post37458</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Rich &ndash; you're right about that. Registration is about what you vote in (e.g. which primary?), not whom you vote for.</p><p>The US Party system is a lot less disciplined than the NZ one &ndash; they are both very broad churches. It's true that it's near impossible for, say, a?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:32:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37461#post37461</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37461#post37461</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>back to the dual US citizenship thing .... (since my family is a wonderfull mixture or all of these) &ndash; the rules are weird and various:</p><p>&ndash; if you take US citizenship you MUST renounce any other citizenships you have &ndash; some countries (NZ included) ignore you, sensibly our country?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:01:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37462#post37462</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37462#post37462</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>This just in: <a href="http://onegoodmove.org/1gm/1gmarchive/2007/12/worst_person_hu.html" target="_blank">Huckabee</a> makes Olbermann's Worst Person in the World. </p><p>I shall get with my submitting immediately...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:09:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37464#post37464</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37464#post37464</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>One should be able to find a party (amongst the 20 or so that contest elections) to match ones ideas, and if not, anyone can start their own and many do.</p></blockquote><p>20 is better than 2, but seriously there is no party that really stands for what I believe, and?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:11:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37465#post37465</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37465#post37465</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Although I was personally hoping that Al Gore would run, I think that both Hillary and Obama would be good Presidents.  It will be interesting to see who the winner picks as their VP.  </p><p>The strategic issues facing the Democrats can be picked up at a glance with a quick?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:46:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>tussock</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37466#post37466</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37466#post37466</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hmm. It appears I'm running for president of the USA, and my name is Dennis Kucinich. Why was I not informed? Surely the liberal media should love this man to pieces.</p><p>What I haven't been able to find: how many skull and bones members this time around? They had it?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:11:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37468#post37468</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37468#post37468</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>surely obtaining filibuster and veto proof majorities must be long term objectives</p></blockquote><p>Seriously?<br />[insert some joke about smoking odd things]</p><p>If the entire US moves to the left, the Senate will never fall to 33 Republicans. The Republicans would just move with the people, and they'd be fighting over a?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:32:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37470#post37470</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37470#post37470</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I don't think there's too many people who don't ultimately derive all of their moral intuitions that way, so "it just feels right/wrong" isn't a vote loser, necessarily. For everyone who feels the same intuitions it's a powerful argument.</p></blockquote><p>I suspect I could without too much trouble, poke holes in?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:42:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37473#post37473</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37473#post37473</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>I always find that policies not backed up by philosophies, can easily become contradictions.</em></p><p>Has that ever stopped them?</p><p>I try to get rid of contradiction where I find it, but whenever you step on moral intuitions you're pushing shit uphill to convince people of things. They just make exceptions?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:23:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37474#post37474</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37474#post37474</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Has that ever stopped them?</p></blockquote><p>No, but I was talking about me, rather than anyone else's messed up world :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:31:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37480#post37480</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37480#post37480</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It was encouraging to see the Democrats make progress in some traditionally red states in the mid-terms...</p></blockquote><p>... Well, still your beating heart WH.  As Graeme pointed out, don't make the mistake of thinking the Democrats and Republicans are just the Labour and National parties writ large.  You'd be surprised?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:53:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37481#post37481</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37481#post37481</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I'm conflicted. Obama is better than Clinton on foreign policy. Clinton, for the most part, is better on domestic stuff.</p></blockquote><p>I agree on domestic policy &ndash; Clinton's policies are more generally developed and she's got far more change of getting thru her sorely needed health sector reforms.</p><p>As for foreign?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:54:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37491#post37491</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37491#post37491</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Seriously?<br />[insert some joke about smoking odd things]</p></blockquote><p>I don't find that especially funny, Graeme.  Do you actually know what you are talking about?</p><p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20477656/" target="_blank">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20477656/</a><br />WASHINGTON &ndash; The last Democratic president to enjoy a filibuster-proof Senate majority was Jimmy Carter 30 years ago.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filibuster" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filibuster</a><br />The term first came into use?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:12:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37495#post37495</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37495#post37495</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>No, but I was talking about me, rather than anyone else's messed up world :)</em></p><p>So was I :-) You're a good example to yourself. If you can't avoid contradiction in your own beliefs (and I can't when it comes to morals), why think anyone else can?</p><p>I see morals?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:31:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37497#post37497</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37497#post37497</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I don't find that especially funny, Graeme. Do you actually know what you are talking about?</p></blockquote><p>I like to think I do &ndash; though I do probably know more about the American political system than I do about American politics.</p><p>I am aware of what cloture is; I acknowledge that?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:35:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37498#post37498</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37498#post37498</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It is sometimes claimed out that modern Republican dominance is unintuitive and is built on the careful exploitation of cultural issues such as religion, race, crime, immigration. et cetera.  This is the "What is the Matter with Kansas" thesis.  There are two ways to go about unpacking this.  The first?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:38:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37500#post37500</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37500#post37500</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The long-term aim of the democrats &ndash; to the extent that political parties (esp American ones) have long-term aims &ndash; must surely be to shift the political centre to the left</p></blockquote><p>What bums me out about them as a party is their triangulation-mania. The Democratic higher-ups are such a bunch?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:42:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37504#post37504</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37504#post37504</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Do you, WH?  There is an argument that even the threat of a filobuster can be &ndash; if judiciously applied &ndash; a powerful tool to moderate legislation (what political leader likes being publicly humiliated by members of his or her own caucus?), or prevent contentious appointments &ndash; such as some?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:46:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37505#post37505</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37505#post37505</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>This is the "What is the Matter with Kansas" thesis.</p></blockquote><p>Which sounds so much nicer on the book jacket than 'Snap out of it, you retarded inbreedl'.  :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:52:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37516#post37516</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37516#post37516</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>filobuster</em></p><p>noun: Isn't that a giant roll of filo pastry stuffed with an entire chicken or similar?</p><p>verb: To make a political speech while eating a <em>filobuster</em>, thus making delivery slow and indistinct, and thus deliberately delaying proceedings. The <em>filobuster</em> has been banned in many parliamentary assemblies as an unfair?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:51:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37520#post37520</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37520#post37520</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>It is sometimes claimed out that modern Republican dominance is unintuitive and is built on the careful exploitation of cultural issues such as religion, race, crime, immigration.</p></blockquote><p>What's unintuitive about that? Hasn't  politics has centered around these issues since time began?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:11:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37522#post37522</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37522#post37522</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>So was I :-) You're a good example to yourself. If you can't avoid contradiction in your own beliefs (and I can't when it comes to morals), why think anyone else can?</p></blockquote><p>I think I can. I just haven't found it/expressed it yet.</p><p>That's OK. I'm still young :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:25:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>WH</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37530#post37530</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37530#post37530</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What's unintuitive about that?</p></blockquote><p>The exploitation is not unintuitive, its the voting pattern that results.  The question is why do people from poor states (who would benefit from Democratic economic policies) vote for anti-government-services Republicans.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What&#039;s_the_Matter_with_Kansas%3F" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What&#039;s_the_Matter_with_Kansas%3F</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:47:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37531#post37531</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37531#post37531</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Since we are trying to work out the principle we can't use the principle to do it. Again we fall back to our feelings.</p></blockquote><p>well God is dead after all- there is no ultimate justification for any moral view. We get to choose.</p><p>but "we fall back to our feelings"?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:51:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37532#post37532</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37532#post37532</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						That's the spirit, keep the dream alive. I guess I should be more clear in what I'm saying. It's not that hard to find an uncontradictory set of beliefs, but you really have to go to work on your moral intuitions to do it. And that makes it very hard?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:53:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37542#post37542</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37542#post37542</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>WH,</p><blockquote><p>The exploitation is not unintuitive, its the voting pattern that results....</p></blockquote><p>I got your point, was just joking really. Yes, poor people voting Republican is nuts, unless you believe what they believe, of course. That religion, race, crime, immigration are the big issues of the day and Republicans have?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:38:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>MikeE</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37544#post37544</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37544#post37544</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Party pill ban delayed</p><p>12.12.2007<br />By MICHELE McPHERSON</p><p>A new law banning party pills containing the chemical BZP has been delayed _ meaning they can be legally sold over the Christmas-New Year holiday period.</p><p>The delay has happened because Parliament has run out of time for the second reading of?</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:43:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37545#post37545</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37545#post37545</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>You'd have thought Jim's press secretary would know how parliament works.</p><p><em>"With the agreement of all parties, legislation can come before the House under urgency but if there isn't that agreement, certain legislation can be blocked," said Mrs Grant.</em></p><p>No, urgency just needs a majority of the House, not unanimity:?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:51:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37558#post37558</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37558#post37558</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ben and Neil- I think there's a little more to it than that (tho I admire the smart way you've wrapped this up!) Empathy seems to lie at the heart of most ethics (as opposed the "handed down from on high" morality- and yeah, that's something which undoubtedly had survival?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:37:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37563#post37563</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37563#post37563</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>you bet me to it Rob.</p><p>empathy is the way out of the dilemma. and it's not reliant on reason. we generally do show concern for the well being of others &ndash; and that does have an evolutionary basis. but some people have less than others and some poeple have?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:00:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37570#post37570</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37570#post37570</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						There are many things that appear to lie 'at the heart' of most ethics, depending on whose heart you are referring to. Kant tried to catch what he thought the heart was with his 'Categorical Imperative', which is a more sophisticated Golden Rule (Do As You Would Be Done By)?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:57:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37576#post37576</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37576#post37576</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I accept a lot of what you're saying, Ben. If it was simple, cockroaches would do it. Ho hum.<br />But I wasn't trying to head down a Kantian path at all. By nature or nurture I'm more of a Humeanist sceptic, heh. <br />And calling most "murderer-suicides" "empathetic" is a stretch.?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:22:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37578#post37578</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37578#post37578</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I hadn't come across Experimental Philosophy before so some time I?ll try and read what's on that site.</p><p>I read more on cognitive psychology but have read some philosophy and have been thinking that philosophy must surely be able to do a lot with recent developments in cognitive psychology and?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:37:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37585#post37585</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37585#post37585</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It doesn't lack empathy if you feel it yourself, but do it anyway. Which is just to say that empathy is not a good guide. If you want to define empathy more carefully, sure. Beware the long dark path from which the word 'Empathy' may emerge unrecognizable, though.</p><p>Empathy means?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:30:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37586#post37586</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37586#post37586</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Reading further, that indeed is some interesting shit. Perhaps I'm being an arse, but the idea of sampling around for ideas of moral behaviour is something I first remember coming across in first year, in a description of some pre-Socratic philosopher, who toured the ancient Mediterranean inquiring into their morals?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:49:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37589#post37589</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37589#post37589</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I don't quite understand your point, Ben, but I'm ready to back carefully away from this, probably out the fire-escape door, not looking backwards, towards where the fire-escape used to be before they ripped it out to put up a post-modern "victorian" facade I can bounce off in my fall?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:00:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37590#post37590</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37590#post37590</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>oops, cross-posting!<br />yeah, i get the "nothing new" feeling myself. not since hume, who single-handed (heh, feel free to disagree!) drove a stake thru philosphy's heart!  <br />then some bastard does something new with an old thing, and ahem we have to keep turning the compast to get rilly good dirt!?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:04:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37591#post37591</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37591#post37591</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Aha, soz then. So you were getting me more than I thought. In that case, yes I entirely agree that even bothering with morals at all could have root cause in empathy. Or you could even consider empathy to be instinctive morality.</p><p>Hume was great, I agree, although I find?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:30:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37607#post37607</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37607#post37607</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Empathy means seeing or feeling it from the other person's side. Which I think is important, but not enough. The other person's point of view may be totally wrong. You may be unable to see it that way. Or you may be deluded into thinking you have. Or, having seen?</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:36:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37610#post37610</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37610#post37610</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I may be wrong, but I'd guess it's got a genetic component, and evolution has put non-empathic people in there for a reason, too. There are a lot of social functions which seem to give low empaths an advantage. I'm thinking warrior types work better that way. But again, whilst?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:32:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37611#post37611</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37611#post37611</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>maybe in some circumstances empathy could even make you a better killer</p></blockquote><p>What a lovely thought.</p><p>Also, this thread has started to make me feel as dumb as a box of hammers. :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:37:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jeremy Andrew</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37612#post37612</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37612#post37612</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Also, this thread has started to make me feel as dumb as a box of hammers. :)</p></blockquote><p>Now there's a feeling I can empathise with...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:47:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37613#post37613</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37613#post37613</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What a lovely thought.</p></blockquote><p>;-) I'm just bitter-ending against any remnants of an idea that empathy could be a sufficient guide to morality. Straw man anyway I know.</p><p>It is often said that criminals can make excellent cops and vice versa, on account of how much time they spend in?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:48:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Neil Morrison</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37623#post37623</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37623#post37623</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>There are a lot of social functions which seem to give low empaths an advantage. I'm thinking warrior types work better that way. But again, whilst having no empathy might be an advantage it also may not be decisive.</p></blockquote><p>are you familiar with game theory? it's the classic cheaters vs?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:02:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>daleaway</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37626#post37626</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37626#post37626</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						One of the quiet delights of getting more venerable &ndash; oh all right, old &ndash; is the increasing ease with which one "lives with doubt",  as you paraphrased Bertie Russell.   Or to move from Bertie to Gertie (and Alice B), to stop looking for the answer and instead mumble "What?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:32:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37627#post37627</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37627#post37627</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>What's the word for a tail-ender who can't actually bowl or field either? Because I think that's my cricketing position.</p><p>I volunteer to bring out the drinks on the little trolley, though.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:37:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37630#post37630</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37630#post37630</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I think I remember Jim Flynn on the radio pointing out that understanding how people feel and caring about it are two different things. Your clever psychopaths find there is more mileage in manipulating people psychologically rather than physically.</p><p>Also, while I've only just scanned the proceeding of the society?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:53:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37705#post37705</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37705#post37705</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Also, while I've only just scanned the proceeding of the society to this point, it might help to consider that saying something motivates us to make moral judgements isn't the same as saying that's what they mean in a logical or semantic way. The psychology of ethics is different to?</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:31:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37973#post37973</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37973#post37973</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Now here's an unexpected opinion from a Sensible Sentencing ancillary:</p><p><a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0712/S00204.htm" target="_blank">Sensible Sentencing Trust Thanks Louise Nicholas</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:13:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37978#post37978</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37978#post37978</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Now here's an unexpected opinion from a Sensible Sentencing ancillary:</p></blockquote><p>Man, that's a badly-written press release ...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:22:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jeremy Andrew</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37980#post37980</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=37980#post37980</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Man, that's a badly-written press release ...</p></blockquote><p>That's so badly written, it makes some of the badly written comments on PAS look positively NCA-acheived-with-merit-worthy.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:26:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>FletcherB</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=38002#post38002</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=38002#post38002</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It thanks LN for helping expose crimes against police officers?</p><p>WTF</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:27:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=38017#post38017</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=38017#post38017</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yeah. That could be read as 'exposing crimes that were committed against police officers', or 'her courageous battle against police officers, which exposed abhorrent crimes'. One suspects the second, but media releases that don't make sense shouldn't get picked up.</p><p>What makes Kelly Te Heuheu a 'Sensible Sentencing Trust Maori?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:03:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Heather Gaye</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=38024#post38024</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=38024#post38024</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What makes Kelly Te Heuheu a 'Sensible Sentencing Trust Maori Crime issues specialist' I wonder.</p></blockquote><p>She's a member of SST, a maori, and a criminal?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:40:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Pihama</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=66781#post66781</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-quite-the-two-step/?p=66781#post66781</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						What weirdo post here Heather Gaye and Kyle Matthews. At least this lady Kelly Te Heuheu cares about victims and doing something about it to help and support them. What are you both doing besides moaning SST are voluntary and work for no pay!!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:28:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
