Hard News by Russell Brown

Read Post

Hard News: Radio New Zealand: changing the channel

45 Responses

First ←Older Page 1 2 Newer→ Last

  • Sacha, in reply to Russell Brown,

    We could assemble over the road at that French place if it's still there. :)

    Ak • Since May 2008 • 19745 posts Report Reply

  • Sacha,

    just say when..

    Ak • Since May 2008 • 19745 posts Report Reply

  • martinb,

    "We can only hope that the proposed changes don’t break things that don’t need fixing."

    Here was me thinking that as a provider of Radio about NZ, radio NZ already had an excellent internet service. Concerned about any changes. After Guyon to Morning Report I'd need to feel that the service was going to remain clearly and significantly a public service and not feel the need to ape commercial stations.

    Auckland • Since Jul 2010 • 206 posts Report Reply

  • Hebe,

    Count me as a mal-content. Seems the world has gone to hell in a handbasket when National Radio is being rebored.

    Christchurch • Since May 2011 • 2899 posts Report Reply

  • Myles Thomas,

    By chasing another 500,000 listeners (content consumers?) Radio NZ may be entering its own little ratings race. Meeting that target they might be tempted to shorten all reports, keep it snappy, run competitions and stick to more positive themes. Hard to believe but look at the rest of NZ media.

    Anyone concerned about this might want to visit www.betterbroadcasting.co.nz (shameless plug sorry Russell)

    TVNZ problems started when it went into competition with TV3 and the marketing department now makes all programme decisions. Radio NZ are not at that point yet.

    Auckland • Since Apr 2011 • 130 posts Report Reply

  • Ian Dalziel, in reply to Russell Brown,

    MT words...

    It’s Media Take

    Will there be online access to replay as well?
    (now that You Tube is changing)
    Plus extra 'content' perhaps, as before...

    Do 'you' still own your own history
    (medias 7 thru 3), can you use old material
    or revisit and build on earlier stories?

    Maybe you could you start by defining 'News'
    as it has become elastic at times
    and constricting at others
    - where the medium stops
    and the message starts

    ...even a show with some of the old media pundits
    Brian Priestley, Brian Edwards, etc
    - like that Dr Who special or a
    Stump the Brians Trust

    have fun
    ;- )

    Christchurch • Since Dec 2006 • 7953 posts Report Reply

  • Sacha, in reply to Myles Thomas,

    Doesn't RNZ already 'outrate' the commercial stations?

    Ak • Since May 2008 • 19745 posts Report Reply

  • Simon Bennett, in reply to paddy free,

    I'm struggling with 'integration' these days - in the product-placement sense of the word. 360 degree brand integration with content. Sad.

    Auckland • Since Nov 2006 • 174 posts Report Reply

  • Paul Williams,

    When we first started Media7, we had then-Education correspondent Gael Woods on to talk about reporting of the Avondale school stabbing incident, and I was so impressed with the way she knew the story every whichway, including things I hadn't thought of.

    I had many dealings with Gael when I worked in the NZ education sector, she was a fantastic journalist. Her replacement, John Gerritson (sp), was equally well informed and professional. I still listen to various RNZ shows online/podcast and enjoy them, but then I am a white middle class bloke so hardly well placed to comment on diversity.

    Sydney • Since Nov 2006 • 2273 posts Report Reply

  • Ben Austin,

    The BBC gets sufficient funding to chase the entire audience range and so attempts to do so (whether it does so successfully, or should attempt this is another question). RNZ does not. If it won't be funded properly, then it should specialise, focusing on what makes it different from the commercial broadcasters (which seems to be less inane chatter-banter).

    Whilst I want RNZ to be across the whole country too, I am slightly worried that without more funding, any efforts to do so simply means running down the central bureau in Wellington, which could undermine the current quality.

    London • Since Nov 2006 • 1027 posts Report Reply

  • Sacha, in reply to Ben Austin,

    If it won't be funded properly, then it should specialise, focusing on

    .. whatever the government of the day reckons is significant.

    Ak • Since May 2008 • 19745 posts Report Reply

  • Sacha, in reply to Ben Austin,

    running down the central bureau in Wellington, which could undermine the current quality

    only if you equate quality with wellington

    Ak • Since May 2008 • 19745 posts Report Reply

  • Geoff Lealand,

    On other media contributions, lovely interview in the Herald this morning, Russell.

    Screen & Media Studies, U… • Since Oct 2007 • 2562 posts Report Reply

  • Ben Austin,

    Well am I wrong in understanding RNZ is principally run of Wellington? Or is this some wider comment about quality?

    London • Since Nov 2006 • 1027 posts Report Reply

  • nzlemming, in reply to Ben Austin,

    Well am I wrong in understanding RNZ is principally run of Wellington? Or is this some wider comment about quality?

    You're not altogether wrong, although they do have a major Auckland component and other smaller branches around the place. Sacha was just indulging his snark, which appears to have put on weight.

    Waikanae • Since Nov 2006 • 2937 posts Report Reply

  • Jos,

    Yes, a good read Mr brown! :)
    I'm looking forward to the program!

    Whakatane • Since Jan 2012 • 877 posts Report Reply

  • Marc C,

    Quote: "Inevitably, some concern will focus on what could be seen as a demotion of the position of news – and perhaps a move to news managerialism. The General Manager of Content will have very broad responsibilities, from news to drama and music."

    TVNZ has been "dismantled", so to say, as a "public broadcaster", and was forced to follow the "market direction" determined by the private competitors.

    I fear that Radio New Zealand may be turned into a similar kind of broadcaster, having little resemblance to true public broadcasting. Of course they need to move more into the digital age, but do not fix what may not need fixing, I'd say.

    Radio NZ is the last rather good quality and independent, balanced media source we have, in public hands, and all these moves must be viewed with great suspicion.

    News and independent, balanced, fact based reporting is becoming rare, do not abolish this at Radio New Zealand, please, we are already being "dumbed down" too much elsewhere.

    Auckland • Since Oct 2012 • 437 posts Report Reply

  • Sacha, in reply to nzlemming,

    running down a welli hq has no intrinsic relationship with quality, is all.
    who you calling fat, boy?

    Ak • Since May 2008 • 19745 posts Report Reply

  • linger, in reply to nzlemming,

    snark, which appears to have put on weight.

    Which would make it a boojum.
    (Conservation of total mass of system => something else has vanished.)

    Tokyo • Since Apr 2007 • 1944 posts Report Reply

  • Ian Dalziel, in reply to linger,

    inter-state free weigh...

    a boojum
    ...something else has vanished

    freezing subatomic gobos?
    cheshire phase quellers?
    are they in the LCD screens?
    (interesting that Tobacco mosaic virus has liquid crystalline phases and structures like many other proteins & detergents - interface material?
    the electric potato?
    hmmm)

    Out here in the Anisotropics
    the supercurrent washes everything away
    eventually...
    ..and then erode into the sunset

    Randomly connected link - when worlds colloid...

    Christchurch • Since Dec 2006 • 7953 posts Report Reply

First ←Older Page 1 2 Newer→ Last

Post your response…

Please sign in using your Public Address credentials…

Login

You may also create an account or retrieve your password.