<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: That&#039;s Entertainment</title>
		<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Public Address</copyright>
			
			
			

			
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9227#post9227</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9227#post9227</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:04:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Don Christie</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9228#post9228</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9228#post9228</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The poll on throng asks if "Will you use TVNZ ondemand?" and gives lots of "no" options.</p><p>Of course, the options that are missing are:</p><p>"No, because of the DRM." and<br />"No, because of sucky file formats".</p><p>given the above...</p><p>"No, because the BBC is going to YouTube".</p><p>Otherwise, I?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:04:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9229#post9229</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9229#post9229</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>"No, because the BBC is going to YouTube".</p><p>Otherwise, I would be a "yes".</p></blockquote><p>The BBC content on YouTube will largely be promotional &ndash; clips from both classic and new programmes. In the case of new programmes, it will be driving viewers to the Beeb's forthcoming iPlayer service, which will?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:14:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jason Kemp</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9230#post9230</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9230#post9230</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Re: Your Listener column &ndash; On the loudness / compression subject &ndash; I have noticed the sound differences as I still don't have an ipod and use a real stereo to listen to music on. </p><p>That this excessive use of compression &amp; audio trickery is actually exhausting is a key point.?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:52:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sebastian</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9232#post9232</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9232#post9232</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Excuse when I lost orientation with all the blinking ads, popping up lately on the public address ... but dont you think it goes a bit over board with the ads here? to replace your header with an ad thatīs even bigger than the pa head &ndash; it just boggles?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:19:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9234#post9234</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9234#post9234</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Excuse when I lost orientation with all the blinking ads, popping up lately on the public address ... but dont you think it goes a bit over board with the ads here?</p></blockquote><p>As I said a few days ago, agency creative for internet advertising is a major problem. I suspect?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:37:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Graham</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9236#post9236</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9236#post9236</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sorry Sebastian, as a content producer I always get annoyed with people who expect quality content but not only don't want to pay for it but can't even avert their eyes from a few ads.</p><p>The internet does not produce zero-cost content, someone has to spend their limited time to?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:44:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>matthewbuchanan</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9237#post9237</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9237#post9237</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>with an ad thatīs even bigger than the pa head</p></blockquote><p>@Sebastian: the PA header was reduced in size to accommodate the advert and so as to not push the content any further down the page than was necessary. Irony eh.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:45:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>noizyboy</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9238#post9238</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9238#post9238</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>ad? what ad? </p><p>oh yeah. firefox adblock. niiice.</p><p>and re: loudness. on the local music front: <a href="http://nzmusicreviews.blogspot.com/2006/11/feelers-one-world.html" target="_blank">the feelers are loud</a>. (and crap.)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:51:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9239#post9239</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9239#post9239</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hmmmm, hold off on the subs idea for now, try and crack the creative for better ads for your site and start a wee sub-brand that provides Creative for Websites That Don't Suck. There will be an initial ramp and you may need a few tips, but then you'll be?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:53:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sebastian</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9240#post9240</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9240#post9240</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>May I also note on the subject of the "compression desease" &ndash; by the way, it occurs to me that another article on "visual compression" on the internet might go well with the discussion of mass compression of audio material &ndash; </p><p>I think itīs a very old subject and I?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:53:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alst</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9241#post9241</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9241#post9241</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Right, time for some conjecture re the new TVNZ ondemand.</p><p>No Macs...but see below..</p><p>International content will cost.<br />NZ content free.</p><p>iTunes 7.1 is out today and lo and behold, little old NZ is one of the only 5 countries that you can now put parental controls on TV and?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:01:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sebastian</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9242#post9242</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9242#post9242</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yes, I know the cost argument. In the west it beats dead any criticism against too many ads everywhere. </p><p>I have been working in Multimedia for years, almost exclusively internet. PA has always been quality and back then it wasnīt probably much more expensive to run the service than it?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:01:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alst</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9243#post9243</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9243#post9243</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						and also....where is TV3 in all of this????
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:08:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hamilton</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9244#post9244</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9244#post9244</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I have no problem with the PA ads, I reckon its an awesome opportunity you have here to do something you love and get paid for it.</p><p>In a more general sense, I've always been surprised that ads on the internet actually make people any money. After years of working?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:23:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Capewell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9245#post9245</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9245#post9245</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Its an interesting discussion about compression &ndash; it is coming up more and more.  I think I'm of the position that I don't own any hi-fi equipment of a high enough quality to really 'get' the difference between 'acceptable' and 'perfect'.  Which is a worry, but I can live with?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:31:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rogan Polkinghorne</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9246#post9246</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9246#post9246</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>David, the research says lots of things, depending on where it comes from! </p><p>In terms of overall media spend, online was one of the biggest growth areas last year (but it's easy to achieve high growth off a low base of course). </p><p>Media organisations have been quick to realise it's?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:34:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Terence Wood</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9248#post9248</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9248#post9248</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The adds don't bother me at all (to be honest I'm more likely to be distracted by the Monty Burns figurine standing on top of my screen).</p><p>If given the choice between paying for an add free site and adds &ndash; I'd definitely deal with the adds*.</p><br /><br /><p>*If you were?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:36:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Green</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9249#post9249</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9249#post9249</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I hate audio compression. I especially hate that TV companies claim they are unable to do anything about the volume of advertisements.<br />It's also frustrating (and very obvious) if (hypothetically of course) a person was to make a mix CD.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:02:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9250#post9250</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9250#post9250</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"I hate audio compression. I especially hate that TV companies claim they are unable to do anything about the volume of advertisements."</p><p>I recall seeing a really neat design for an "adkill" TV accessory that relied on the typical compressed audio signal to detec ads. It seemed quite easy to?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:08:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Green</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9251#post9251</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9251#post9251</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Because surely the mastering is done, and then that master is pressed to CD and vinyl, so the sound (and therefore dynamic range) is essentially the same? I could be wrong, I'm interested to know.</p></blockquote><p>That is an interesting question. However, I wonder whether the way analogue representation of heavily?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:12:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Green</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9252#post9252</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9252#post9252</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I recall seeing a really neat design for an "adkill" TV accessory that relied on the typical compressed audio signal to detec ads. It seemed quite easy to build...</p></blockquote><p>My old TV had a built in solution. When there was too much white space in the picture, the sound turned?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:16:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9255#post9255</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9255#post9255</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>If you were to threaten me with those evil pop up video things I might yield though.</p></blockquote><p>Not. Going. To. Happen.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:46:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nais</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9259#post9259</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9259#post9259</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>RB: rather have the ads and let all find PA than to 'lock it down' under user-pays content.</p><p>Also, anyone shed any light on this....</p><p>Signed up for iTunes (yea yea teenagers had it for yonks mother finally gets around to it!) and joined NZ store too.  Went to download?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:06:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9261#post9261</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9261#post9261</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>ad? what ad?</p><p>oh yeah. firefox adblock. niiice.</p><p>and re: loudness. on the local music front: the feelers are loud. (and crap.)</p></blockquote><p>I was thinking the same thing James, I've yet to see an ad on PA..until I checked the Adblock log....</p><p>CD compression is simply lazy. It doesn't need?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:16:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JP Hansen</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9273#post9273</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9273#post9273</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Signed up for iTunes (yea yea teenagers had it for yonks mother finally gets around to it!) and joined NZ store too. Went to download USD1.99 file to be told only avalable to Visa cardholders with US billing address.</p></blockquote><p>iTunes  NZ is fiddly to get started with. After signing in,?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:58:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9279#post9279</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9279#post9279</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>Our secret with the three Nice'n'Urlich albums was the way we mastered. Listen now and they still sound loud, but keeping the warmth of the vinyl and they subtlety of the range were absolutely vital to the success. They push without clipping because the range was maintained. Rick spent days?</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:29:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Graham</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9287#post9287</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9287#post9287</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>ad? what ad?</p><p>    oh yeah. firefox adblock. niiice.</p></blockquote><p>Bragging about this to a content producer is a bit like bragging about stealing their lunch. If everyone used ad blockers there wouldn't be much of an internet worth viewing. Something to think about.</p><blockquote><p>In a more general sense, I've always been?</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:53:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9293#post9293</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9293#post9293</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>PS: You made me think of Deep Swing's 'Takin' Me Higher', from one of those albums. That has one of my all-time favourite breakdowns and you're right: the bass part where it comes back in sounds fucking gorgeous.</p></blockquote><p>Some of those tracks on the N'n'U albums (and indeed on our?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:25:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9294#post9294</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9294#post9294</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Bragging about this to a content producer is a bit like bragging about stealing their lunch. If everyone used ad blockers there wouldn't be much of an internet worth viewing. Something to think about.</p></blockquote><p>C'mon James, surely you flick channels during the ads, or hit the mute. Even Salon's view?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:34:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Graham</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9297#post9297</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9297#post9297</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Advertising is not, yet anyway, compulsory viewing.</p></blockquote><p>And neither is any website. If I had the option to block users with ad-blocking software from seeing my sites I would. It is a quid pro quid that I do not think is unreasonable.</p><p>Sure I block TV and almost all forms?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:51:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hamish</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9298#post9298</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9298#post9298</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I suspect that people who install ad-blocking software have <em>no</em> intention on clicking on web adverts &ndash; so the benefits are two-fold: they don't have to see the ad, and you don't have to waste resources serving it.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:26:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9299#post9299</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9299#post9299</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And neither is any website.</p></blockquote><p>As a producer of some of the niche content you are talking about I understand where you are coming from, but taking it one step further, it's not compulsory to produce such. </p><p>I actually don't object to advertising on niche sites, but the adblocker is,?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:31:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Terence Wood</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9301#post9301</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9301#post9301</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>off topic and a request for assistance:</p><p>A week or so ago in comments to one of Russell's posts a debate erupted over Democracy. One poster noted that democracy could only be grown from the grass routes up to which Craig R replied (more or less) "what about Germany and?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:02:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jason Kemp</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9304#post9304</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9304#post9304</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>But a question: how many readers would pay a one or two dollars a week subscription for PA without the ads? Like everything, it would cost yet more money to set up (and I've spent thousands in the last few months), but is it worth pursuing?</p></blockquote><p>A no ads Subscription?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:18:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9305#post9305</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9305#post9305</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						YES, CDS ARE TOO LOUD. You can?t even call it ?compression? anymore; more like bleedin? ?decapitation?. They just chop the peaks clean off, leaving a jagged edge that cuts through the brain like a miniature Skilsaw. It?s criminal!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:34:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sebastian</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9311#post9311</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9311#post9311</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>While you Kiwis are all sleeping, I just need to note a further thought from my breakfast table &ndash; just to oppose the flood of pro-ads entries ;)</p><p>mainly, this is directed @ James Graham. </p><p>See, PA once started out with a consistent, clean and modern layout. Easy to read?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:30:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Graham</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9316#post9316</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9316#post9316</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I suspect that people who install ad-blocking software have no intention on clicking on web adverts &ndash; so the benefits are two-fold: they don't have to see the ad, and you don't have to waste resources serving it.</p></blockquote><p>Most major websites (NZ Herald, Yahoo etc) make most of their money?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:23:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Morgan Nichol</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9318#post9318</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9318#post9318</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Just whitelist the damn site.  It's not hard, right click the adblock button in the bottom right corner of your Firefox window and choose whitelist this whole site.  Done.</p><p>Goddamn freeloader.</p><p>And, yes, I hate the Vodafone ads as well, not because they're ads, but because they're Vodafone.  Fuck Vodafone.?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:30:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Capewell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9320#post9320</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9320#post9320</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What I would truly like to see from the Flying Nun catalogue is some inventive, smart compiling. Thematic releases...</p></blockquote><p>I wholeheartedly agree &ndash; but as Andrew Dubber and many others would testify, CD is not the right medium for this.  Having the whole catalogue online enables the label to create?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:52:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9325#post9325</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9325#post9325</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>I actually don't object to advertising on niche sites, but the adblocker is, for me, essential to block the overwhelmingly corporate advertising I don't want to be bombarded with...and its hard to draw a line (or tweak for every site), hence my unanswered question about blocking pop-ups..if PA decided that?</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 08:43:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>jon_knox</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9326#post9326</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9326#post9326</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Am not sure that creating a premium ad-free PA experience would be worth the time/money/effort.  When considering alternatives such as putting the content (&amp;/or conversations) behind a paywall, I think would unduely cut down the audience and the number of participants.</p><p>I barely notice the advertising, which indicates that I'm not?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 08:46:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9327#post9327</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9327#post9327</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I made the same point on PA System a few days ago about the header, personally I would place the top leaderboard ad below the PA header. As you say though each publisher gets to design their site the way they<br />want.</p></blockquote><p>We tried a few different ways of handling?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 08:46:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Green</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9358#post9358</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9358#post9358</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						With respect to the ethics of using adblock. If your site has flash ads, and I'm at home browsing it with dial-up, <em>they will be blocked</em>. At work, it's not an issue.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:03:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9362#post9362</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9362#post9362</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>With respect to the ethics of using adblock. If your site has flash ads, and I'm at home browsing it with dial-up, they will be blocked. At work, it's not an issue.</p></blockquote><p>Sam Morgan has been quite good value on this issue. TradeMe has a high percentage of dial-up users?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:16:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9364#post9364</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9364#post9364</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Funny, been reading PA for a while and checking out System since it came onboard and the old first-time poster bit is coming up here because of two topics that really interest me bundled into one here!</p><p>1. Audio compression.  I worked in hi-fi (as in the retail side of?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:22:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9365#post9365</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9365#post9365</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Govt contract for social marketing, lotsa bucks and who cares? (I'm gonna pay dearly for this comment...)</p><p>Suit: Hey we need a blinky blinky webby type ad for the interweb.<br />Creative: Really, woo, cool, OK I'm on it.</p><p>Creative (later on cellphone): Hey how much for a blinky blinky ad?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:28:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alan Macdougall</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9366#post9366</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9366#post9366</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Back to the TVNZ downloading thing...</p><p>Where are NZ on Air in all of this? Do they have a say in how NZ on Air funded programs are later used? Or do all subsequent rights revert to the broadcaster?</p><p>If the former were the case, then NZ on Air might?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:35:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Green</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9368#post9368</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9368#post9368</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Flash as an ad format lets you do more interesting things than just wink and blink at people &ndash; we could run an RSS feed straight into an ad if someone wanted it &ndash; but people don't tend to.</p></blockquote><p>Oh, I absolutely appreciate that (and that PA is more broadband).?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:55:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Greg Dawson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9375#post9375</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9375#post9375</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So I unblocked PA in the adblocker (as per the earlier commnet &ndash; i had no idea you could do that).</p><p>Except that then work servers promptly blocked most of the externally reffing ads as non-business.  Oh well.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:29:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9382#post9382</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9382#post9382</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I wholeheartedly agree &ndash; but as Andrew Dubber and many others would testify, CD is not the right medium for this. .</p></blockquote><p>Actually I don't really agree with that. Pop aside, the celebrity playlists online are largely seen as a failure on the likes of iTunes. A box, such as?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:37:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9385#post9385</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9385#post9385</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Actually I don't really agree with that. Pop aside, the celebrity playlists online are largely seen as a failure on the likes of iTunes.</p></blockquote><p>Yep. They're bollocks, by and large. <em>But</em> I often make use of the user playlists on emusic. They're a really handy path to follow.</p><blockquote><p>I simply?</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:44:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9388#post9388</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9388#post9388</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>There is a difference: pop-ups are actively intrusive.</p></blockquote><p>I think we all agree on that but I was just trying to find out James' position on those, and I think he has the same position on blocking them as he does on banner advertising...</p><blockquote><p>but kept the ad-blocker as an?</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:21:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9392#post9392</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9392#post9392</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>This was the point of the column I mentioned in the original blog post: Warners is hobbling itself because it won't put the back catalogue in the place where it has a shot at an audience.</p></blockquote><p>And you are spot on Russell, there is no excuse to keep this stuff?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:33:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9400#post9400</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9400#post9400</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Just checked <a href="http://www.greatfirewallofchina.org" target="_blank">http://www.greatfirewallofchina.org</a><br />for historyorb.com Feels like an accomplishment to be blocked, as is public address :)</p></blockquote><p>Everyone who?s blocked gets a badge:</p><p><a href="http://img.scoop.co.nz/stories/images/0703/badgeflat160.jpg" target="_blank">http://img.scoop.co.nz/stories/images/0703/badgeflat160.jpg</a></p><p>Bearing in mind, as I just said where <a href="http://www.freespeech.org.nz/section14/2007/02/28/banned-in-china/" target="_blank">I originally heard about that site</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Not that I?m sure I want to encourage getting banned by the Chinese Government?</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:29:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lyndon Hood</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9402#post9402</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9402#post9402</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Also, I note the greatfirewall people have added a "this version 1.0 may report sites as being ?blocked?, while there are only technical reasons for their unavailability. " to there test page. I did wonder.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:33:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9442#post9442</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9442#post9442</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Dance vinyl has an inherently better dynamic range than CDs. I'm not sure that any traditional 33rpm vinyl albums are getting pressed any more? Most "albums" are multi-platter sets these days &ndash; cost about twice that of a CD but much better quality &ndash; I'm assuming they get separately mastered???
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 09:11:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9456#post9456</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9456#post9456</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Dance vinyl has an inherently better dynamic range than CDs.</p></blockquote><p>Absolutely true, and those of us with rooms of the stuff are happy to shout that out as often as possible. Plus a 12" slab of vinyl cannot help but look vastly cooler than a silly small silver disc.  And?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:50:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9469#post9469</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9469#post9469</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>With DVD, there is no reason why you shouldn't be able to get albums in a lossless 24-bit format (e.g. Flac). Not seen many though.</p></blockquote><p>Beatport is now offering the option of purchasing tracks in uncompressed WAV format. It costs $1 more for the extra data (the files are up?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:47:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9607#post9607</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9607#post9607</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>We were talking about the prospect of the Pin Group being on emusic. Well, guess what. Siltbreeze have issued a retrospective:</p><p><a href="http://www.emusic.com/album/10993/10993354.html" target="_blank">http://www.emusic.com/album/10993/10993354.html</a></p><p>And it's slightly surprising  <a href="http://www.emusic.com/lists/showlist.html?lid=19544555&amp;nickname=Maz-Man&amp;cs=1" target="_blank">how much</a> has been able to be added by the US indies who have licensed local releases, including some Nun stuff. Hopefully that will act?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:43:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9611#post9611</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9611#post9611</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>We were talking about the prospect of the Pin Group being on emusic. Well, guess what. Siltbreeze have issued a retrospective</p></blockquote><p>well, there you go..., that's really very cool, and hopefully there will be a few buyers, especially as you've pointed out, with the site's rather user friendly business model.?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:53:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Simon Grigg</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9612#post9612</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-thats-entertainment-1/?p=9612#post9612</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Recording contracts usually have a territory by territory time option in them...ie if the label in a certain territory doesn't exercise a right by a certain time then the rights revert to the artist to sell as they can. </p><p>I added Digital as one of those territories in a contract?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 17:17:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
