<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Hard News: The perils of political confidence</title>
		<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Public Address</copyright>
			
			
			

			
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236742#post236742</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236742#post236742</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:32:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danyl Mclauchlan</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236743#post236743</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236743#post236743</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I didn't think much of Johns' interview this morning. Either the tape is a 'game-changer', in which case he should have the balls to publish it, or it isn't, in which case he should just admit that it isn't in the public interest.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:32:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236744#post236744</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236744#post236744</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Johns</q></p><p>Too many Johns in this story. #Confusing ;)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:39:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236745#post236745</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236745#post236745</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>To be entirely cynical for a moment, it is possible that:</p><p>1) Teapottapegate is the proverbial storm in a tea cup, but there?s a certain amount of (justified) paranoia in Nat circles about how rogue tape recordings will be sliced up and spun.</p><p>2) Far from being ?potentially a game-changer?,?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:44:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236746#post236746</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236746#post236746</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I didn't think much of Johns' interview this morning. Either the tape is a 'game-changer', in which case he should have the balls to publish it, or it isn't, in which case he should just admit that it isn't in the public interest.</q></p><p>It's not hard to see how the?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:44:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danyl Mclauchlan</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236747#post236747</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236747#post236747</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>It's not hard to see how the contents of the tape could fall between the poles of evident public interest and unremarkable private chat and still be a significant political story.</em></p><p>No. But that's not how the HoS editor is describing it &ndash; the tape is 'breathtaking', 'a game-changer', that?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:49:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236748#post236748</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236748#post236748</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>5) ?The sense of political fixing in the Epsom deal has been hugely amplified by the incident.? You may wish to expand that a tad, Russell.</q></p><p>I don't think it's outrageous to say that the Epsom deal is perceived as a political jack-up, and that this incident fosters the immersion?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:53:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236751#post236751</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236751#post236751</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>No. But that?s not how the HoS editor is describing it ? the tape is ?breathtaking?, ?a game-changer?, that he?s decided not to publish for reasons which are still rather vague.</q></p><p>To be fair, it was Milne who used the word "breathtaking", and in a particular context:</p><p><q>But it's the?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:57:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236752#post236752</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236752#post236752</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The legal exclusion quoted by Price and others is important (and has been conveniently ignored by the foaming commenters at Slater and Farrar's blogs):</p><p><q>does not include such a communication occurring in circumstances in which any party ought reasonably to expect that the communication may be intercepted by some other?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:57:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236753#post236753</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236753#post236753</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						As usual it will amount to nothing. The initial "how dare they record the Prime Minsters private meeting" has got everybody's knickers in a twist. Can you really imagine a politically explosive discussion between Key and Banks at all let alone one held in front of a bunch of journalists,?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:57:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236754#post236754</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236754#post236754</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>"how dare they record the Prime Minsters private meeting" has got everybody's knickers in a twist.</q></p><p>and such a predictable tactic that the media who have swallowed it should feel like fools</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:01:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236755#post236755</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236755#post236755</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>and the pair?s assessment of the prospects of National, Act and NZ First.</q><br />Hang on... Didn't Key say he wouldn't work with Peters?<br />flippity flop, you just can't trust that man Key</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:04:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236757#post236757</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236757#post236757</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It seems feasible that National's own polling had shown that Winston First would get in, and so they needed Act as a counter. Though as Russell notes, discussing it in that setting reflects extreme confidence that there would be no consequences.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:06:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236758#post236758</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236758#post236758</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sacha wrote,</p><p><q>Comparing a contrived photo op in a public setting a metre from an invited press posse with hacking of private phone conversations is masterful spin, breathlessly regurgitated by TVNZ and others.</q></p><p>I agree, we can only watch on and see what affect this has. Any publisher that does?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:10:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236761#post236761</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236761#post236761</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Kathryn Ryan right now saying this distraction is the last thing National wants. #fail
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:17:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DeepRed</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236762#post236762</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236762#post236762</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It takes a lot to unhinge Mr Key. But then again, covert taping seems to do that to anyone, regardless of political colour or celebrity status. Still, if Key really had nothing to hide, why did he get so worked up?</p><p>Also, comparisons with the News of the World are?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:17:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236763#post236763</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236763#post236763</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Stuff has <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/campaign-trail/5960522/Tea-tape-embarrassing-for-PM" target="_blank">an update</a>, with the Greens calling for National to release the transcript &mdash; which, presumably, National doesn't actually have.</p><p>And John Key said more this morning:</p><p><q>Key said he would not give permission for the tape to be released because "once you start News of the World tactics?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:18:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danyl Mclauchlan</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236764#post236764</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236764#post236764</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><em>If this develops into an actual feud with the HoS and its publisher, that's not exactly ideal for National, but they don't seem to be trying to avoid such an outcome. Quite the reverse.</em></p><p>Every press secretary knows that the public despises the media, even more so than politicians (especially?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:21:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236765#post236765</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236765#post236765</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I don?t think it?s outrageous to say that the Epsom deal is perceived as a political jack-up, and that this incident fosters the immersion that the parties involved have something to hide, even if they don?t.</q></p><p>My (highly negative) opinion of *cough* electoral accommodations has been crystal clear, and unchanged,?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:21:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236766#post236766</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236766#post236766</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It can be argued that it was not a private conversation , that it was in fact a very well signaled media event.<br />Bad for National? Only if they have something to hide, surely.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:22:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236767#post236767</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236767#post236767</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So, could this be case of form in a teacup?</p><p>Ummm...what would have happened if there were two lip readers outside the window and giving a running commentary of the two J's chitchat??</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:22:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236768#post236768</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236768#post236768</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Every press secretary knows that the public despises the media, even more so than politicians (especially a popular one like Key). So a protracted fight with a media outlet is a gift from heaven.</q></p><p>Radio NZ's Epsom vox pops this morning didn't seem to bear out this theory.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:22:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DeepRed</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236769#post236769</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236769#post236769</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>My (highly negative) opinion of *cough* electoral accommodations has been crystal clear, and unchanged, since Bolger fucked over his own Wellington Central candidate, quite literally in the last thirty seconds of his last television interview of the campaign.</q></p><p>I've mentioned in another thread that it's a relic of the FPP?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:23:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236770#post236770</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236770#post236770</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>they don't seem to be trying to avoid such an outcome</q></p><p><em>look over there</em></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:25:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236771#post236771</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236771#post236771</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Any lip readers able to get anything worthwhile off the TV footage? (I'm assuming there's some reasonable footage taken through the windows by all those TV cameras).</p><p>Would neatly sidestep the table recording issue.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:27:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236774#post236774</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236774#post236774</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Not in seats like Epsom, which has a huge right-wing majority in the 70% plus range,
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:33:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236775#post236775</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236775#post236775</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Price's analysis is very helpful and it appears the HoS may retain the right to publish without penalty if they are convinced (and can subsequently prove) the taping was not intentional. I can't unravel the facts from the various published stories, however the lack of a transcript simply fuels speculation.?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:33:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236777#post236777</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236777#post236777</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Ummm?what would have happened if there were two lip readers outside the window and giving a running commentary of the two J?s chitchat??</q></p><p>Apart from confirming my suspicion that Newmarket is a test site for franchising the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malebolge" target="_blank">Malebolge</a> on Earth?  Not a lot. :)</p><p><q>It can be argued that it?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:38:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236778#post236778</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236778#post236778</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It could also be argued that high profile journalists (expecially on TV) have no expectation of privacy, and a little light stalking after beer o'clock on a Friday night is in the public interest.</q></p><p>According to Price, only if they'd issued a media release inviting the media to attend their?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:40:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236779#post236779</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236779#post236779</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						i think it is a telling comment on the state of our media that the HoS even asked for permission to publish. What a rum state of affairs that is! Is that what our newspapers have been reduced to? Meekly asking permission from the governing party to publish a story??
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:42:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236781#post236781</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236781#post236781</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>to the extent that lip readers are "a device"</q></p><p>much like trained martial artists/boxers are a weapon, legally.<br />oh they'll love that. :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:49:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Stowell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236782#post236782</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236782#post236782</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yeah. Anyone else find it *odd* (a mis-use of the term) to talk of 'privacy' at a meeting taking place a cafe(?) open to the public, to which one has invited media galore, with the express purpose of <em>getting publicity</em>?<br />I gather the press were ushered behind glass for the?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:49:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236783#post236783</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236783#post236783</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						+1, they (the two Johnnies) can't have it both ways. And yes Rob, I agree, this is high farce.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:49:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ben Dugdale</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236784#post236784</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236784#post236784</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Perhaps they should have had their little tea party in the Ureweras....
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:50:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236786#post236786</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236786#post236786</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Heh, and who drinks tea nowadays at a cafe anyway, unless it is tied to a media message, too much talk of tea bagging for my liking &ndash; all too clever. Oh yeah and did the Johnnies &ndash; you know &ndash; notice that there was erm a device, sitting right?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:53:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236787#post236787</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236787#post236787</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>i think it is a telling comment on the state of our media that the HoS even asked for permission to publish. What a rum state of affairs that is! Is that what our newspapers have been reduced to? Meekly asking permission from the governing party to publish a story??</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:56:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236788#post236788</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236788#post236788</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh and after thought, why were they having a cup of tea again?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:00:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236789#post236789</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236789#post236789</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						you really don't want to see Banks on coffee :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:05:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236790#post236790</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236790#post236790</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I don?t agree. I suspect the tactic was (a) get their assent or not = story (b) claim to have a right to publish = story (c) publish or not = story. Repeat = story.</q></p><p>And I suspect we'll have to wait till next Sunday to find out the ending.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:07:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236791#post236791</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236791#post236791</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hah! The photo of him smiling <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/campaign-trail/5960522/Tea-tape-embarrassing-for-PM" target="_blank">http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/campaign-trail/5960522/Tea-tape-embarrassing-for-PM</a> is terrifying, strange thing is that the Epsom voters I know detest the man's business dealings...honey indeed.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:07:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236793#post236793</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236793#post236793</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Both Banks and Brash getting away with such minimal publicity about their involvement with Hujlich is revealing too.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:16:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236796#post236796</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236796#post236796</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yup. That case is being completely swept under the carpet.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:32:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew  Hooton</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236799#post236799</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236799#post236799</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I agree with Danyl &ndash; if it really was a "gamechanger" etc then the editor had a responsibility to publish and be damned.  </p><p>And, Russell, the editor said it would have shared the front page with the Zac Guildford story, which was a massive story by anyone's news judgment.  So,?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:04:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew  Hooton</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236800#post236800</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236800#post236800</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Also agree that the tea was a fail.  The symbolism required Banks to buy Key a triple espresso and force him to consume it.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:07:24 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236801#post236801</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236801#post236801</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Has Banks been using botox? The frozen smile suggests it...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:10:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236802#post236802</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236802#post236802</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						probably all that beeswax
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:14:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236803#post236803</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236803#post236803</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Ideas, attitudes <em>and</em> visage frozen in the past... makes sense
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:14:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236804#post236804</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236804#post236804</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Time will tell on this one. </p><p>Key could have made a dick move, creating a story where there was none, or it could work out &ndash; maybe the conversation was banal, and he's refusing on principle, hoping to lure opposition into focusing on it. Then he can authorize the release?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:18:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236805#post236805</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236805#post236805</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						There is a drone-like earnestness that disquiets.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:19:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236806#post236806</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236806#post236806</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>maybe the conversation was banal, and he's refusing on principle, hoping to lure opposition into focusing on it. Then he can authorize the release and it will be about Coro St, which tea to order, etc. Then once again opposition will have lost valuable time playing the man rather than?</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:23:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236807#post236807</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236807#post236807</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>since it?s not like ....  they can?t meet in actual private</q></p><p>I'm not sure that they can, given than John Key's movements are probably highly scrutinised at present, and a meeting in private might suggest that they really were plotting something nasty.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:30:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236808#post236808</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236808#post236808</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Indeed, I find the circumstances of this recording weird. It could even be a trap of their own making, to try to make the opposition sound paranoid.</q></p><p>In that case, Joyce should be taken out behind the barn and shot for breaking one of the Ten Commandments of Modern Electioneering.?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:37:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236809#post236809</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236809#post236809</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That's much more plausible. Possibly Key provided a frank and critical appraisal of Brash and Banks agreed?</q></p><p>It could be absolutely anything, given the tiny tidbits of nothingness we've got so far. Could be nothing more than a belief by the Herald people that the tone of two really rich?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:39:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236811#post236811</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236811#post236811</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Bad tone could be more damaging to Key than anything actually substantial, since they have no popular policy. </q></p><p>Not around here, anyway. (Sorry, needed to be said.)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:49:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gareth Ward</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236812#post236812</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236812#post236812</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Both Banks and Brash getting away with such minimal publicity about their involvement with Hujlich is revealing too.</q></p><p>Yeah this still astounds me &ndash; especially when Brash came out last week clamouring for the abolition of Kiwisaver itself.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:04:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236813#post236813</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236813#post236813</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I'm not sure that they can, given than John Key's movements are probably highly scrutinised at present, and a meeting in private might suggest that they really were plotting something nasty.</q></p><p>I don't reckon, on either score. The PM can move in secret if he so desires, and has the?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:04:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Beard</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236815#post236815</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236815#post236815</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the Zac Guildford story, which was a massive story by anyone's news judgment</q></p><p>Not by my judgement. Gossip? yes. Sports news? yes. Worth a few sniggers on Twitter? definitely. Deserving most of every front page in the frickin' country? Hell no.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:22:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Beard</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236816#post236816</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236816#post236816</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> a meeting in private might suggest that they really were plotting something <br />nasty</q></p><p>What, nastier than their actual manifestos and public statements? Now, that's scary.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:24:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236817#post236817</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236817#post236817</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I frankly think Labour and others should ignore this incident completely, since it is news manufactured by the Herald, and puts them at loggerheads with the Government. The Herald can handle it, they don't need any help at all making the news up, and if Key gets grumpy with them,?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:26:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236818#post236818</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236818#post236818</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The thing about this ?tea party? is that it?s a contrived photo opportunity, designed quite carefully to convey key messages non-verbally.</q></p><p>I hadn?t watched <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/lightbox/national/politics/campaign-trail/5951413/?KeepThis=true&amp;TB_iframe=true&amp;height=560&amp;width=640" target="_blank">Stuff?s video of the event</a> until just now.</p><p>It?s a right old pantomime. But Banks looks humiliated most of the time.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:41:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236819#post236819</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236819#post236819</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It's fine, he's not telling anyone how to vote, yo Banksie!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:46:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236820#post236820</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236820#post236820</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>I frankly think Labour and others should ignore this incident completely, since it is news manufactured by the Herald, and puts them at loggerheads with the Government. The Herald can handle it, they don?t need any help at all making the news up, and if Key gets grumpy with them,?</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:46:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236821#post236821</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236821#post236821</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Banks looks humiliated most of the time</q></p><p>like an old dog, I thought</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:52:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236822#post236822</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236822#post236822</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>calling for Key to release the transcript</q></p><p>I take it they have already established that the transcript is more damning than the verbal recording complete with tone.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:54:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JLM</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236823#post236823</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236823#post236823</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm assuming, probably incorrectly,  that the item they don't want to be made public is a discussion about Banks taking over from Brash as leader of ACT...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:57:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236824#post236824</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236824#post236824</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I take it they have already established that the transcript is more damning than the verbal recording complete with tone.</q></p><p>I think everyone?s over-thinking this! They?ve called for a transcript because Johns has said there?s a transcript. I seriously doubt they?ve heard the actual recording.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:00:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236825#post236825</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236825#post236825</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I?m assuming, probably incorrectly, that the item they don?t want to be made public is a discussion about Banks taking over from Brash as leader of ACT?</q></p><p>Or something of that order, yes. But that's a very good guess.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:00:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236826#post236826</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236826#post236826</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Johns has said there's a transcript</q></p><p>oh, missed that.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:01:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236827#post236827</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236827#post236827</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I don't think there's as much potential for blowback as you suggest, and it's not as if they have anything to lose.</q></p><p>They do have something to lose &ndash; image. Key has gained popularity every time his honesty has been called into question by Labour. There is a risk that?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:04:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Raymond A Francis</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236828#post236828</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236828#post236828</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I agree, this is just a sideshow and it is a pity Labour and the media are being sucked in<br />" Look over there"<br />How likely is it these two would say anything incriminating with a scrum of journalists just through the glass, hopefully Key was saying he would not?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:06:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Richard Aston</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236829#post236829</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236829#post236829</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Looking at your photo Russell &ndash; of Johns X2 </p><p>There seems to be bugger all else on that table except a big black bag. I wonder if the conversation went like </p><p>JB" eh John is that your manbag?"<br />JK " not exactly Johnny B, I passed my bloke test, don't?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:08:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236830#post236830</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236830#post236830</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>oh, missed that.</q></p><p>It was in Johns' Morning Report interview. He said that he hadn't heard the actual recording.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:08:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236831#post236831</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236831#post236831</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>How likely is it these two would say anything incriminating with a scrum of journalists just through the glass,</q></p><p>Well, why clear out the journalists at a media event, then?</p><p><q>hopefully Key was saying he would not be voting for Banks which he did go onto say publicly</q></p><p>Sorry, no.?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:18:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236832#post236832</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236832#post236832</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>??Otherwise speculation will continue to mount. What did they say about the role of other parties in the government they would like to form? Did the sale of further state assets come up???</q></p><p>Oh, if Grant managed to say all that with a straight face I want to have his?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:21:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236833#post236833</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236833#post236833</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Well, why clear out the journalists at a media event, then?</q></p><p>To give it authenticity as a cup of tea? And to avoid undermining the authenticity of it by having to actually script a careful conversation about politics, or undermine any political purpose in it at all by talking only?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:23:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Farrell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236834#post236834</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236834#post236834</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>One of the commenters here has a transcript:<br /><a href="http://www.interest.co.nz/news/56703/90-seconds-9-am-bnz-blair-warns-euro-leaders-about-eurozone-break-shanghai-stock-exchange#comment-654618" target="_blank">http://www.interest.co.nz/news/56703/90-seconds-9-am-bnz-blair-warns-euro-leaders-about-eurozone-break-shanghai-stock-exchange#comment-654618</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:26:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236835#post236835</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236835#post236835</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>One of the commenters here has a transcript:</q></p><p>Obvious fake.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:31:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236836#post236836</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236836#post236836</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Meanwhile, what about the serious allegations of influence peddling by Pita Sharples? electorate manager? Anyone have anything to say about that?</q></p><p>If it's as described in the story, then it is extremely serious. I trust we will hear more on this.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:31:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Farrell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236837#post236837</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236837#post236837</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I know that &ndash; I thought some might enjoy it.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:34:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236838#post236838</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236838#post236838</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>To give it authenticity as a cup of tea? And to avoid undermining the authenticity of it by having to actually script a careful conversation about politics, or undermine any political purpose in it at all by talking only pleasantries. It worked better as something seen but not heard.</q></p><p>So?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:38:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236839#post236839</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236839#post236839</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I know that ? I thought some might enjoy it.</q></p><p>I think 3410 was being ironic :-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:38:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236840#post236840</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236840#post236840</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Okay, this thing went up several notches just now.</p><p>Stuff?s Twitter account is reporting that Key will complain to the police over the matter.</p><p>It?s probably a decent strategy for Key and his people ? to reframe it as a criminal offence against him ? but it?s also a bit?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:41:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236841#post236841</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236841#post236841</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Wheels have come off.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:43:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236842#post236842</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236842#post236842</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I wouldn't be surprised if Key and Banks talked real actual politics. Heaps of this stuff needs to be done face to face/man to man, and those chances don't happen often in an election campaign.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:45:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Farrell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236843#post236843</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236843#post236843</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yes, but it will delay publication until after the election.<br />I find this strange. If it's innocuous, release it, and  let the story die.<br />The increasing fuss just fuels suspicion.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:45:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236844#post236844</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236844#post236844</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Edit: John Edwards has pointed out this could backfire if the police don?t find a case to prosecute. That would leave the way open for the HoS to publish.</q></p><p>Yeah, but not for months. And even then, a decision by police that there was no criminality involved wouldn't mean publication?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:46:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236845#post236845</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236845#post236845</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I very much doubt this has been the case for either of them for a very long time. </q></p><p>Although Banks doesn't drink he does call in to meet up with friends at the Cavalier, just as Winston Peters does,  (he does like a tipple). Banks did afterall once own it?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:46:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Farrell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236846#post236846</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236846#post236846</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						That's the problem with the internet....Poe's law and all that.....
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:47:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236847#post236847</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236847#post236847</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So your contention is that Bryce Johns has put his head on the block &mdash; and potentially his job on the line &mdash; by entirely fabricating the details of a conversation and telling everyone about this non-existent conversation, including APN's layers and senior executives?</q></p><p>No, I think that a conversation?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:48:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236848#post236848</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236848#post236848</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Also, were the media invited to this tea fest? Because, you know, that may change things somewhat.<br />Oh and writing that what they said is game changing then refusing to say more has a weird burlesque feel to it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:48:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236849#post236849</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236849#post236849</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Heaps of this stuff needs to be done face to face/man to man, and those chances don't happen often in an election campaign</q></p><p>Yes, where in the 7*24*4 = 672 hours during the campaign could they possibly find the time to pick up a telephone? Or get any of their?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:51:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236851#post236851</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236851#post236851</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Of course I?m only going on public information in this, I don?t have journalistic insiders feeding it to me.</q></p><p>Same. But I am familiar with editorial environments and I know two or th three journalists involved.</p><p><q>Maybe there is a real leak here, which would explain the instant Labour lockjaw?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:58:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236852#post236852</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236852#post236852</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>two extremely canny politicians </q></p><p>I needed a laugh</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:00:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236853#post236853</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236853#post236853</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You don't do that over nothing</q></p><p>totally &ndash; and Johns was always an impressive editor at the Waikato Times.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:01:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236854#post236854</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236854#post236854</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Also, were the media invited to this tea fest? Because, you know, that may change things somewhat.</q></p><p>They were.</p><p><q>Oh and writing that what they said is game changing then refusing to say more has a weird burlesque feel to it.</q></p><p>Johns sounded fairly stressed on the radio this morning.?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:01:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236855#post236855</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236855#post236855</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>totally ? and Johns was always an impressive editor at the Waikato Times.</q></p><p>He was. He's an intelligent man.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:02:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236856#post236856</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236856#post236856</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Stuff?s Twitter account is reporting that Key will complain to the police over the matter.</q> </p><p>National has <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10496419" target="_blank">got form</a> on bullying the media when it goes off-message in cultivating the cult of Key.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:03:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236858#post236858</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236858#post236858</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I still think you don't acknowledge how far out on a limb Johns and his journalists have gone already. You don't do that over nothing.</q></p><p>You'd probably have to elaborate about the risks. The recording/transcript has not been released yet, so there's not much of a limb there, is there?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:05:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236859#post236859</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236859#post236859</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Anyway, from the Stuff story, quoting Johns on the radio:</p><p><q>Bryce Johns said Key was doing "an exceptional job at deflecting the attention in this saga from what he said".</p><p>"I've got a bit of disdain for the prime minister right now and the lines they are running."</p><p>Senior editorial?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:07:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Farrell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236860#post236860</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236860#post236860</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Time for someone to channel the Duke of Wellington.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:08:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236861#post236861</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236861#post236861</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It's a Media7 show unfolding before our eyes/ears..
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:09:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>dc_red</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236862#post236862</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236862#post236862</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Heh, in the TV3 video when the Rt Hon hops out of his limo to meet Banks, there's a prominent sign in the background across the road: "Clark & Clark"
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:11:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236863#post236863</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236863#post236863</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Also, were the media invited to this tea fest?</q></p><p>Banks announced his Tea party the day before if I recall correctly. He said it was the afternoon.<br /><q> Key will complain to the police over the matter.</q><br />...Could mean he is complaining to the Police for their incompetence in looking at?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:11:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236864#post236864</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236864#post236864</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>?Clark &amp; Clark?</q><br />And the other says " For Lease":)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:12:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236865#post236865</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236865#post236865</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If the media were invited, how can it be framed as a private conversation?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:14:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236867#post236867</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236867#post236867</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You?d probably have to elaborate about the risks. The recording/transcript has not been released yet, so there?s not much of a limb there, is there?</q></p><p>Key is to make a criminal complaint at 4pm today and Joyce has already issued an incredibly aggressive media statement. That's a limb and a?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:16:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Carol Stewart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236868#post236868</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236868#post236868</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>For Lease</q><br />Unfurnished?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:16:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236869#post236869</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236869#post236869</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If the media were invited, how can it be framed as a private conversation?</q></p><p>I imagine m'learned friends are mulling over that one already.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:17:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236870#post236870</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236870#post236870</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If the media were invited, how can it be framed as a private conversation?</q></p><p>I believe Steven Price rather generously leaned in the direction of expectation of privacy based on the media being ushered onto the other side of the glass.</p><p>If the idea of laying charges is to tie?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:18:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236871#post236871</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236871#post236871</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>not much of a limb there</q></p><p>Given the way this government has consistently shunned certain media outlets without consequence, one risk is being denied access for another 3 years.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:20:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236872#post236872</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236872#post236872</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The invitation becomes all important because there would obviously be rules of engagement. <br />... the PM's staff ordered the pack away to give the two men some time for a private discussion. <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/blogs/the-whip/5963065/Whats-in-the-teapot-tapes-really" target="_blank">http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/blogs/the-whip/5963065/Whats-in-the-teapot-tapes-really</a><br />I don't know if that is actually viable after you have invited the media there to cover?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:24:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236873#post236873</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236873#post236873</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Well HOS have got until Sunday then.... <em> WE ALL WANNA KNOW! </em> m'kay ?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:24:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236874#post236874</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236874#post236874</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The Manawatu Standard weighs in: <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/manawatu-standard/opinion/5960769/Editorial-Picking-row-not-in-Keys-best-interests" target="_blank">Picking row not in Key's best interests</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:31:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236875#post236875</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236875#post236875</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Stuff?s Twitter account is reporting that Key will complain to the police over the matter.</p><p>It?s probably a decent strategy for Key and his people ? to reframe it as a criminal offence against him ? but it?s also a bit creepy.</q></p><p>To be coldly cynical about it, I don't?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:32:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236876#post236876</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236876#post236876</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Key is to make a criminal complaint at 4pm today and Joyce has already issued an incredibly aggressive media statement. That's a limb and a half.</q></p><p>Yes, but what else could the Herald have done? Destroyed the tape? Things heard can't be unheard. The news is out there now. It's?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:32:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>dc_red</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236877#post236877</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236877#post236877</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yes, my first thought was that the criminal complaint was a stalling tactic. The Police could easily take 6-12 months to address such a pressing issue ... sure as <strong></strong> it won't be done by the time the next HoS goes to print? </p><p>How many years did it take for?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:35:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236878#post236878</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236878#post236878</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The tea thing as a signal for vote skewing has precedents (Clark, Greens) proving this was an orchestrated PR stunt with full media presence invited, hell it was signaled weeks before with a countdown. Full media presence means recording of the event. To cry fowl that your security did not?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:37:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236879#post236879</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236879#post236879</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Bradley Ambrose, the cameraman, has <a href="http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/newsdetail1.asp?storyID=209007" target="_blank">spoken to NewstalkZB</a>:</p><p><q>Bradley Ambrose says he was filming the meeting in Epsom between John Key and John Banks when Mr Banks started answering questions.</p><p>He says that's when he put his microphone on the table.</p><p>"I had enough time and enough space just to?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:38:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236880#post236880</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236880#post236880</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>but I think it would have just been smarter to say "publish and be damned" and let it be a one day wonder</q></p><p>Yes, I really thought that's what they'd do. Color me surprised.</p><p><q>Given the way this government has consistently shunned certain media outlets without consequence, one risk is?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:40:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236882#post236882</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236882#post236882</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>  <em>I know that ? I thought some might enjoy it.</em></p><p>I think 3410 was being ironic :-)</q></p><p>Yep.<br />Sorry, John. Too dry, perhaps. :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:41:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236883#post236883</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236883#post236883</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Pshaw, Red.  As Idiot/Savant pointed out last week, the Police are fully occupied not investigating cases of alleged electoral law breeches against multiple candidates referred to them by the Electoral Commission.  Be reasonable, chap ? as Jim Anderton wisely told us there?s rape and pillage out there and you can?t?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:42:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236884#post236884</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236884#post236884</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Attacking something peripheral that can be framed as about dishonesty is a pretty good strategy to deflect any claims of lying about numbers or suchlike. Why they'd feel threatened at this stage is a mystery, though these are largely the same paranoid goons that starred in The Hollow Men.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:42:29 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236885#post236885</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236885#post236885</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						In an earlier report (Herald I think) Ambrose states that he was not permitted by security staff to go back and retrieve his microphone. This is shaping up to be an accidental doozie. Also it appears to me that Mr Key may be falling into the trap of his National?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:45:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236886#post236886</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236886#post236886</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Radio NZ's Morning Report has huge listenership, but you'll notice that hasn't stopped Key and co.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:46:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian MacKay</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236887#post236887</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236887#post236887</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						"FRENCH PRESIDENT Nicolas Sarkozy told US president Barack Obama he was fed up dealing with Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu and considered him a liar. .......Mr Sarkozy made the alleged comments during a private conversation with Mr Obama ......and the remarks were overheard by a small number of journalists but?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:47:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>dc_red</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236888#post236888</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236888#post236888</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						We won't know for sure until he says "I love you too Mr Goff"
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:48:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236889#post236889</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236889#post236889</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						They can only do that for so long before all media are giving all political airtime to their opponents. Which marketing genius thought of that?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:50:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236890#post236890</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236890#post236890</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Questions need to be asked as to the relationship between National and the media, what's with ordering the media there then ordering them out?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:52:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236891#post236891</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236891#post236891</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Speaking of National's weird treatment of Radio NZ, the party has simply refused to respond to <a href="http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/election-2011/policies" target="_blank">Radio NZ's online policy Q&amp;A</a>.</p><p>It does come across as unfathomably contemptuous.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:53:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236892#post236892</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236892#post236892</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>A very similar situation?</q></p><p>Oddly enough, I don't think it's done Sarkozy any harm is a country where criticism of Israel is not automatically seen as rank anti-Semitism.  Obama makes a simple statement of fact in response, and the usual suspects on the psychotic right have a collective meltdown.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:53:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236893#post236893</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236893#post236893</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Yes, where in the 7*24*4 = 672 hours during the campaign could they possibly find the time to pick up a telephone? Or get any of their thousand flunkies to do it.</q></p><p>Well, like I said, face to face. It is likely that there are things that the two Johns?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:54:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236894#post236894</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236894#post236894</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>"I wasn't able to get a shot so I backed off and while I was backed off trying to get other shots we were basically hustled out of the room, told to get out."</q></p><p>If this is confirmed as a fact and Steven Price's analysis is correct, and I've no?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:54:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236895#post236895</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236895#post236895</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Surely there is some legality as to their (NP) having to respond to the media?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:55:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236896#post236896</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236896#post236896</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Questions need to be asked as to the relationship between National and the media, what?s with ordering the media there then ordering them out?</q></p><p>It's one of the stories of campaign 2011, so they didn't need to do any more than announce the place and time. 40 reporters and camera?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:55:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236897#post236897</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236897#post236897</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>"I love you too Mr Goff"</q></p><p>bravo</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:56:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236898#post236898</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236898#post236898</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>"It was surprising that they tried to turn a media stunt into a private meeting, though."<br />I think that is the hinge moment that will echo down through the ages ;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:56:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236899#post236899</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236899#post236899</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>They can only do that for so long before all media are giving all political airtime to their opponents.</q></p><p>And however tempting a collective editorial spite-fuck like that would be, I'd respectfully suggest both the BSA and Press Council would have quite a bit to say about that &ndash; especially?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:57:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236900#post236900</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236900#post236900</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>hubris is going to always make for an Icarus moment</q></p><p>Put nicely by SF writer and historian Brian Aldiss, ?hubris clobbered by Nemesis?.</p><p>While I'm on a brief classical roll, despite the depravity of many Emperors, I've loved the Roman custom of having a slave ride in the chariot of?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:00:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236901#post236901</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236901#post236901</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It does come across as unfathomably contemptuous.</q></p><p>Unfathomably?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:04:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236902#post236902</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236902#post236902</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It does come across as unfathomably contemptuous.</q></p><p>It's quite fathomable to me that someone at Campaign HQ needs a good hard sucker punch for not doing the bloody simple "cut and paste relevant policy talking points into an e-mail and hit send"job that's probably been sitting on someone's task list?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:04:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Beard</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236903#post236903</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236903#post236903</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Cock-up over conspiracy, Keystone Cop trumps Machiavelli.</q></p><p>Not necessarily conspiratorial, just disdainful. It's not inconsistent with their normal approach to RNZ.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:09:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236904#post236904</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236904#post236904</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It is also likely that these things they say are not massively important in and of themselves, but serve some kind of signalling function.</q></p><p>In what Universe are these guys unable to have a face to face meeting to do whatever signalling they haven't already done with each other a?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:11:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236905#post236905</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236905#post236905</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>they didn't need to do any more than announce the place and time</q></p><p>interesting snippet from that Manawatu Standard story about other campaign events:</p><p><q>The ministerial offices have been keeping MPs' movements on the campaign trail close to their chests in the past few weeks. Media advisories have been distributed?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:12:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DeepRed</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236906#post236906</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236906#post236906</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Not necessarily conspiratorial, just disdainful. It?s not inconsistent with their normal approach to RNZ.</q></p><p>In the same way John Howard didn't much like the ABC. Yet somehow the ABC is in a far stronger position than RNZ when there's a fiscal lasersight pointed at it.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:19:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236907#post236907</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236907#post236907</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It seems to fit in with a general strategy of hit-and-run campaigning.  Get your orchestrated event publicised, say your piece in a way that can be repeated as a soundbite and never, ever be seen to be explaining or qualifying or, Geryon forbid, reacting.  The recording at the cup of?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:22:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236908#post236908</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236908#post236908</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Indeed wouldn?t they want to do it in private if they wanted any chance of real signals, and a meaningful discussion?</q></p><p>The essence of all conspiracy theories is that those in power are competent.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:24:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DeepRed</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236909#post236909</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236909#post236909</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And I'm not one to state the obvious, but the wider point in the whole Tea Tapes affair is that forced exposure to sunlight is the fatal weakness of a comms strategy that relies on keeping the hoi polloi deaf, dumb, happy and fat. It worked for Woodward & Bernstein, and?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:26:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236910#post236910</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236910#post236910</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Whether or not the tape reveals Key and Banks chanting in unison, ?Ph?nglui mglw?nafh Cthulhu R?lyeh wgah?nagl fhtagn?, the <em>suspicion</em> that something was said and that it?s being covered up in some way has resulted in a serious backfire, it seems, hence the panic.</p><p>This rather overstates the case (it?s?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:33:11 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236911#post236911</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236911#post236911</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>In what Universe are these guys unable to have a face to face meeting to do whatever signalling they haven?t already done with each other a hundred times? Indeed wouldn?t they want to do it in private if they wanted any chance of real signals, and a meaningful discussion?</q></p><p>Because?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:37:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Farrell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236912#post236912</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236912#post236912</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Now the regular right posters on trademe are running the line that it is a "News of the World" scale scandal, which will lead to huge support for Key when he stamps out the evil lefty tabloid media....
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:37:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236913#post236913</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236913#post236913</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The police statement:</p><p><q>URGENT MEDIA ADVISORY<br />November 14, 2011, 5:22 pm</p><p>Police have confirmed that the this afternoon we have received a formal complaint from the Prime Minister Right Honourable John Key concerning an allegation that a private conversation between himself and the Honourable John Banks has been unlawfully recorded.?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:44:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Farrell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236914#post236914</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236914#post236914</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Time for someone anonymous to leak it, methinks.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:47:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236915#post236915</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236915#post236915</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Media outlets are advised that it is an offence to disclose private communications unlawfully intercepted. </q></p><p>So, what was that about a secret agenda? seems it is so secret the police are now protecting the Prime Minister from the people.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:51:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keir Leslie</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236916#post236916</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236916#post236916</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think that at this point they just have to publish and be damned. It is all very mucky and annoying, and I have to admit I am really kinda curious.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:52:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236917#post236917</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236917#post236917</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>National will be responsible for the bringing of criminal charges against a newspaper editor. That is hardly ever a good look.</q><br />Right-thinking New Zillunders will agree that those pinko editors should know their place. All hail King John.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:55:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236919#post236919</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236919#post236919</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>All hail King John.</q></p><p>More like King Cnut, trying to hold back the tide of public opinion.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:59:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236920#post236920</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236920#post236920</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						At Shirley, it's "New Cylinders" in Keyspeak.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:00:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Martin</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236921#post236921</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236921#post236921</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Media outlets are advised that it is an offence to disclose private communications unlawfully intercepted. </q></p><p>Such as when Bill English was taped during the previous election? Or when Obama and Sarkozy were recently, regarding Netanyahu?</p><p>Why now?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:00:17 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236922#post236922</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236922#post236922</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Why now?</q></p><p>Because National have no policy left to announce, it is just a sideshow. Can you really imagine Key and Banks having anything important to say. Just gossip about Peters that's all.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:02:37 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236923#post236923</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236923#post236923</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So if the recording is deemed unlawful, the HoS seems to have already committed the offence.</q></p><p>Not necessarily. </p><p><q> "where any person discloses the private communication, or the substance, meaning, or purport of the communication or any part of it</q></p><p>The courts would need to decide if the Herald's published stories?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:05:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236924#post236924</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236924#post236924</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Guyon Espiner reports that "another news organisation" has a copy of the tape.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:07:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236925#post236925</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236925#post236925</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						TV3 news said they do.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:08:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236926#post236926</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236926#post236926</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>if the Herald's published stories discloses the recorded conversation's content</q></p><p>the quotes above are enough.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:08:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236927#post236927</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236927#post236927</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>At Shirley</q></p><p>damn popular place, despite the quake</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:09:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>ange wither</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236928#post236928</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236928#post236928</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You'd have to strongly suspect from the 3 news item that the tape contains discussion about rolling Don Brash straight after the election.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:10:03 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236929#post236929</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236929#post236929</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the quotes above are enough.</q></p><p>Possibly, but that's a matter first for the Police and then the Courts. </p><p>I might've misunderstood Russell's point, my point was the disclosure <em>alone</em> isn't a matter the Police would likely prosecute as (a) the HoS claim the recording was inadvertant and (b) the existence?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:14:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236930#post236930</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236930#post236930</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The contents of the recording were characterised. However, the first matter is what a reasonable expectation of privacy is in this context.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:20:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236931#post236931</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236931#post236931</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I?m really not sure if going to the cops was a good idea. If the police prosecute, National will be responsible for the bringing of criminal charges against a newspaper editor. That is hardly ever a good look.</q></p><p>Neither am I, but I'm not entirely comfortable with the idea that?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:21:28 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236932#post236932</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236932#post236932</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You?d have to strongly suspect from the 3 news item that the tape contains discussion about rolling Don Brash straight after the election.</q></p><p>As Judi Lapsley Miller predicted in this very thread earlier today!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:22:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236933#post236933</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236933#post236933</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>Neither am I, but I?m not entirely comfortable with the idea that if you?re a politician you?re just asking for anything and everything that happens to you. Might be a radical idea, but even if you think Key and Banks are porn-sized twatcocks they?re entitled to exactly the same recourse?</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:24:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Martin</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236934#post236934</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236934#post236934</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Indeed. And Banks put on the spot. How sad...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:24:48 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>John Farrell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236935#post236935</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236935#post236935</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The spoof transcript at interest.co runs along the same lines, as well....
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:26:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Martin</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236936#post236936</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236936#post236936</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>But have we been had? Will folk now be more inclined to vote for a Banks led ACT?</p><p>heh.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:27:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236937#post236937</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236937#post236937</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Found this opinion on <a href="http://forums.punkas.com/viewtopic.php?p=1251930&amp;sid=8e3c2255ee57719e92558e3a715ce6d9 " target="_blank"> PunkAs</a><br /><q>"The NZ Herald claim John Key has not given permission for his privacy to be breached. But i point to the David Lange ( Lange v Atkinson) defamation case where the court ruled that a politician discussing a matter of public interest does not?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:32:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JLM</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236939#post236939</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236939#post236939</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>As Judi Lapsley Miller predicted in this very thread earlier today!</q></p><p>Um, not quite, but thanks : ). See my Location. The initials are a hang over from work days, when I didn't want to be seen indulging in political discourse in work hours. After four years of blissful retirement?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:36:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Littlewood</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236940#post236940</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236940#post236940</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Unless I misunderstand him, the National MP is here suggesting the Herald on Sunday?s alleged behaviour is worse than that of a British tabloid with an institutional culture of mendacity so endemic and rotten that it was closed down by its owners; a paper that hacked the phone of a?</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:36:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236941#post236941</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236941#post236941</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>they're entitled to exactly the same recourse to the law as everyone else</q></p><p>I'll bear that in mind next time I invite the media to my photo op</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:39:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Geddis</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236942#post236942</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236942#post236942</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Steve,</p><p>No. Lange v Atkinson related to the question of whether there exists a qualified privilege defence for an individual who is sued in defamation by a politician, on the basis of things the individual says about the politician's public actions. It has nothing to do with privacy.</p><p>And what?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:48:31 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236943#post236943</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236943#post236943</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And what law does the PunkAs commentator think the Herald should be prosecuted under, if it doesn?t publish the recording? The law of ?not doing what I want??</q></p><p>That is what I thought too.<br />The fact that Key has gone to the trouble of involving the police would tend to?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:04:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236944#post236944</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236944#post236944</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I?ll bear that in mind next time I invite the media to my photo op</q></p><p>Oh, Sasha &ndash; I think there are legitimate ethical questions here, and assessing any possible illegality is way above my pay grade.  But, yeah, my hackles start to ripple when folks think saying "photo op"?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:20:10 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236945#post236945</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236945#post236945</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>my review of the new Stephen King</q></p><p>Lots of people die in an impressively bloody manner and there aren't too many big words.</p><p>Does that break the embargo?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:22:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236946#post236946</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236946#post236946</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://dimpost.wordpress.com/2011/11/14/inevitably-2/" target="_blank">Could be worse</a> (warning: contains echinacea).
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:25:26 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236947#post236947</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236947#post236947</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						another King
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:25:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236949#post236949</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236949#post236949</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>As Judi Lapsley Miller predicted in this very thread earlier today!</q></p><p>It is, after all, a fairly straightforward question that could be put to ACT without needing to hear any secret tapes. They're standing Banks and not Brash in the electorate. This means there is every chance Banks could end?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:35:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>merc</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236950#post236950</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236950#post236950</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh what a tangled web we weave...there is no honour in this.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:38:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236951#post236951</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236951#post236951</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>a fairly straightforward question that could be put to ACT</q></p><p>The <a href="http://www.3news.co.nz/Teapot-tapes-raise-questions/tabid/419/articleID/232724/Default.aspx" target="_blank">3 News story</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:38:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Hood</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236952#post236952</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236952#post236952</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Perhaps the government could seek to retroactively change the law to make clear the taping was legal.</p><p>Maybe not.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:44:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sofie Bribiesca</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236953#post236953</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236953#post236953</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Another John, this time Campbell asked Brash if he thought Banks would be honest to him if his leadership was at stake after the Election. Remember TV3 know what's init.<br />Brash thinks so. Yes.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:45:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236954#post236954</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236954#post236954</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ha!</p><p><q>NZ First leader Winston Peters told 3 News he thought Mr Key should ?release them?</q></p><p>And this morning on RNZ Winnie was saying that the media were engaging in despicable, illegal <em>News of the World</em> tactics and that was all there was to it.  A <em>day</em> is a long?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:55:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Leopold</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236955#post236955</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236955#post236955</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Bit of a fake brouhaha cooked up between Joyce and Herald management to keep any Green and or Labour policy launches off the front pages? (Zac was just a one day drunk wonder?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:05:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>thegirlstefan</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236956#post236956</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236956#post236956</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>A few minutes ago I was  called on my landline to participate in a NZ Herald Digi Poll, for my opinion on  current election-related events.</p><p>Amongst the questions you'd expect &ndash; how are you voting for:  party/electorate/MMP referendum- and a couple around National Standards, moving to Australia etc.</p><p>I was?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:05:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236957#post236957</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236957#post236957</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						A day is a long time in Winnie's mind
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:09:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236958#post236958</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236958#post236958</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						So, do they ask the "how are you voting" question first, or after the topic and personality ones?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:12:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236959#post236959</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236959#post236959</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I was surprised that there were none about "Tapegate"</q></p><p>too recent</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:14:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kracklite</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236960#post236960</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236960#post236960</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh fuck it, I'm voting for Vespasian.  He was witty, even if he is dead now.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:18:14 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>thegirlstefan</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236961#post236961</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236961#post236961</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>they ask if you're the householder, over 18, and enrolled to vote- then the questions- then the demographic stuff.</p><p>The woman talked at the start and conclusion about how it wasn't a sales pitch and about how I was in the draw to win a $500 voucher.</p><p>I don't think?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:25:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>steven crawford</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236962#post236962</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236962#post236962</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Key seems to be going all PC gone mad about this privacy stuff. I for one am not voting for the brighter future policy now, just because.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:33:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236963#post236963</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236963#post236963</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> one was about if recent activity by ACT had ?discredited? it</q></p><p>That could be any time.<br />;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:35:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>thegirlstefan</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236966#post236966</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236966#post236966</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>True that.</p><p>Hone's wiping the floor in the Te Tai Tokerau debate on Maori TV Presidential, yet with a comforting amount of swearing just so you know he he hasn't been bodysnatched.</p><p>And some quality questions too.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:03:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian MacKay</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236967#post236967</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/hard-news-the-perils-of-political-confidence/?p=236967#post236967</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It has been said that the Key Department is very very sensitive about staff Security- almost paranoiac.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:33:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
