I do think McCully is that rare sort of MP who prefers opposition to government :-)

A lawyer I know, whom I guess was having trouble serving someone, finally got a process server, and wondering how they would succeed?

He then unlocked the?

Risky.

Service of Process within the precincts of the Court is sometimes considered to be a contempt of Court. And at an actual hearing? That might be a step too far.

Don't normally do the tweets saying what I had for breakfast etc but am now doing constituency clinic #inplainview

"In person" doesn't include on a blog or Twitter I presume.

If you've tried a few times, and actually can't find them, or know where they live, you may be able to arrange to get a Court's permission for substituted service, which can sometimes be by email, or facebook.

But?

I asked if it was in order to hand him?

I?d say she?s more like Minister Ratched, who's already dropped proceedings against RadioNZ.

And the defendants continue to brush it off as an entry for the Stella Awards.

Political abuse of MPs is fine. Just not a fan of arguments based on people's appearances, is all.

__Archbishop Mallard remained steadfast in his refusal to recant. This news threw Queen Judith (still in France) into a rage in which she was purported to shout: "What sluggards, what cowards have I brought up in my court, who care nothing for?

Sorry, I meant to say. McCully represented himself against the QC, and a well-regarded Senior Crown Counsel who is now a High Court Judge, and won. It went back to the HRRT where there was some sort of settlement.

Perhaps derision isn?t really based on appearances but the exhibition of and expression of dominant personalty traits shared between political figures and comedic actors (clowns).

So saying Mallard is a prime candidate for the Red Wiggle is offensive?

I am very rarely offended by anything :-)

From reading the Twitter feeds, it's funny how the Oily One and his hangers-on berate Ducky for vindictiveness. Pot, meet Kettle.