<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Muse: V.S. Naipaul and the Gentle Art of Prostate Gazing</title>
		<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Public Address</copyright>
			
			
			

			
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216618#post216618</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216618#post216618</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:16:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216619#post216619</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216619#post216619</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						When I read yesterday what Naipaul had written about Austen, I immediately thought of you, Craig. Nice work.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:16:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216621#post216621</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216621#post216621</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Isn't the whole point of <em>Sense and Sensibility</em> that an over-reliance on romantic tosh means you'll wind up nearly dying of pneumonia and should have just married that nice middle-aged widower in the first place?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:30:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216622#post216622</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216622#post216622</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Or, in <em>Emma</em> : don't set your sights on the romantic stranger; marry your sensible next-door neighbour.</p><p>Or, in <em>Northanger Abbey</em> : act like a swooning idiot and lose that nice sensible chap you enjoy hanging out with.</p><p>(Yeah, I could do this all day.)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:34:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216624#post216624</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216624#post216624</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Up to a point.  I've known one or two teenagers flouncing around I've been sorely tempted to smack around the head with a copy of <em>Sense and Sensibility</em>.  (Though a hardcover of <em>Middlemarch</em> would probably make a more satisfying crack.)  Nowadays, though, I suspect Leonard Cohen CDs are more likely?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:39:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>recordari</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216627#post216627</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216627#post216627</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Shakespeare's sonnets.</q></p><p>121 would seem apposite.  Just sayin'.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:09:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Martin Lindberg</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216631#post216631</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216631#post216631</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						(note to self: refrain from quoting Mark Twain on Jane Austen in this thread)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:57:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ngaire BookieMonster</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216632#post216632</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216632#post216632</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Isn't the whole point of Sense and Sensibility that an over-reliance on romantic tosh means you'll wind up nearly dying of pneumonia and should have just married that nice middle-aged widower in the first place?</q></p><p>Especially if that nice middle-aged widower is Alan Rickman.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:00:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Deborah</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216639#post216639</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216639#post216639</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I feel no such restraint, Martin.</p><p><q>    ??. Well, Miss Elliot,? (lowering his voice) ?as I was saying, we shall never agree I suppose upon this point. No man and woman, would, probably. But let me observe that all histories are against you?all stories, prose and verse. If I had such?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:12:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>recordari</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216642#post216642</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216642#post216642</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I do like a good quote-off.</p><p><q>No one is more arrogant toward women, more aggressive or scornful, than the man who is anxious about his virility.</q><br />&amp;<br /><q>The writer of originality, unless dead, is always shocking, scandalous; novelty disturbs and repels.</q></p><p><br />Simone de Beauvoir.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:23:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Martin Lindberg</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216643#post216643</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216643#post216643</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I'll let Mark Twain rip then:</p><p><q>I haven't any right to criticise books, and I don't do it except when I hate them. I often want to criticise Jane Austen, but her books madden me so that I can't conceal my frenzy from the reader; and therefore I have to?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:54:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216664#post216664</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216664#post216664</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I?ll let Mark Twain rip then:</q></p><p>OK.  Personally, I can never quite tell how much of Twain's writing prove anything more than he would have made a damn good talkback radio host or blog-farmed comment troll if he'd been born in 1985 instead of 1835.  Emily Auerbach has a [[http://www.vqronline.org/articles/1999/winter/auerbach-barkeeper-entering/|fascinating?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:08:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Martin Lindberg</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216668#post216668</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216668#post216668</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>OK. Personally, I can never quite tell how much of Twain?s writing prove anything more than he would have made a damn good talkback radio host or blog-farmed comment troll if he?d been born in 1985 instead of 1835.</q></p><p>True, but I do love his turn of phrase. I'll bookmark?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:16:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216670#post216670</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216670#post216670</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Yeah I love Mark Twain?s quotes on Austen, (I do like most ?classics?  but for some reason just can?t stand Austen) my favourite one:<br /><q>Jane Austen? Why I go so far as to say that any library is a good library that does not contain a volume by Jane Austen.?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:19:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216678#post216678</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216678#post216678</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>on the wrong side of Craig</q></p><p>you'll survive</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:59:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>recordari</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216696#post216696</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216696#post216696</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I should endeavour to [sic] get on the wrong side of Craig.</q></p><p>It takes some practice, but eventually you'll get the hang of it.</p><p>Anyway, who needs Austen when you've got Harold Robins?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:25:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Parks</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216703#post216703</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216703#post216703</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>...Naipaul?s sadistic abuse of his first wife and various mistresses.</q></p><p>I hadn't heard of that until I read <a href="http://dimpost.wordpress.com/2011/06/14/sir-vidia-and-the-women/" target="_blank">this at The Dim-Post</a>.</p><p><q>Carnal pleasure meant violence ? in fact it was inextricable from beating Margaret up, degrading her in bed, turning the great man?s penis into an object of worship.</q>?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:16:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216704#post216704</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216704#post216704</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And now I have just insulted, albeit by proxy, his favourite author.</q></p><p>Meh... if Austen's reputation can survive waxing and waning for two centuries, I can deal with others not sharing my perfect literary taste. :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:28:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tamsin6</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216712#post216712</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216712#post216712</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I remember the lovely controversy over the interview conducted by Mrs Naipaul with the former Mrs Mandela last year.</p><p><a href="http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23812947-how-nelson-mandela-betrayed-us-says-ex-wife-winnie.do" target="_blank">http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23812947-how-nelson-mandela-betrayed-us-says-ex-wife-winnie.do</a></p><p>There are a few clues in that piece about how Naipaul views women, and just other people generally.</p><p><q>My nerves were playing up: my husband does not like to be?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 03:34:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216714#post216714</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216714#post216714</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Combine that with his myopic views on women writers, and it?s clear Naipaul has serious issues with women.</q></p><p>If you want to read <em>A Writer?s People</em>, I think it?s pretty clear that Naipaul has serious issues with men too ? well, male writers who get attention that belongs to him.?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:01:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DeepRed</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216758#post216758</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216758#post216758</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If you want to read A Writer?s People, I think it?s pretty clear that Naipaul has serious issues with men too ? well, male writers who get attention that belongs to him. </q></p><p>Which would make him a misanthrope, right?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:43:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nik C</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216787#post216787</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216787#post216787</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Diana Athil's response to him calling her work "feminine tosh" was quite amusing too. Basically along the lines of, "Lol, come at me bro." </p><p>"I can't say it made me feel very bad. It just made me laugh ... I think one should just ignore it, take no notice really."?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:51:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216824#post216824</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=216824#post216824</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The most casual flick through <em>Stet</em> would reveal that Athill is about as sentimental as a flick knife ? she has Naipaul?s measure (and several other authors) with forensic precision.  But she also provides a useful reality check on anyone who wants to get too nostalgic about the good old?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:58:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Timothy Maby</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=217518#post217518</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=217518#post217518</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hi folks from England, Just discovered your blog on the recommendation of writer/performer originally from NZ Stella Duffy. I produce a weekly books podcast for guardian.co.uk and we discussed this issue a couple of weeks agoi9n a show all about how literature was a way for feminists to campaign. Our?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 02:34:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=217537#post217537</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=217537#post217537</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Editor of Granta, John Freeman wondered why so many ageing male writers turn curmudgeon. </q></p><p>Honestly, I don't know if that's an affliction you can pin on the literary XY chromosome. Germaine Greer, anyone?  Fay Weldon?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:24:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=217605#post217605</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/muse-vs-naipaul-and-the-gentle-art-of-prostate/?p=217605#post217605</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>But I cant think of too many others, Craig?</p><p>And most female writers I know (as in, have met &amp; enjoyed conversations with, as well as via their books) of an age even more senior than mine, are singularly gracious beings. And, interestingly, not competitive.</p><p>Naipaul (whom I?ve never met) strikes?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 17:48:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
