<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | OnPoint: Tax cut zombies</title>
		<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Public Address</copyright>
			
			
			

			
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152496#post152496</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152496#post152496</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:22:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Morgan Davie</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152497#post152497</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152497#post152497</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Stop using maths, Keith, and give me my tax cuts.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:22:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Peter Martin</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152499#post152499</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152499#post152499</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hey...arithmetic stole my tax cuts.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:26:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Christopher Nimmo</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152500#post152500</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152500#post152500</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ah, but the editors will be getting a tax cut.</p><p>And Key himself was talking about a "3 or 4 billion dollar package", wasn't he?</p><p>And Johnny would <em>never</em> tell a lie!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:28:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hadyn Green</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152509#post152509</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152509#post152509</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						National Standards in numeracy FTW!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:45:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152513#post152513</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152513#post152513</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And Key himself was talking about a "3 or 4 billion dollar package", wasn't he?</p><p>And Johnny would never tell a lie!</p></blockquote><p>Should have called it a "6 to 8 billion dollar package": $3b-$4b in tax cuts, and $3b-$4b in tax increases...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:51:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152514#post152514</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152514#post152514</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I was spluttering about this over breakfast this morning.</p><p>The comments on the article on Stuff indicate that the public is not fooled, however. I loved the one that called key "the most anti-natalist ruler since King Herod."</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:53:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mike Graham</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152518#post152518</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152518#post152518</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>stop being so logical Keith &ndash; remember that this is politics.</p><p>Good post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:59:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James W</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152523#post152523</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152523#post152523</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I found it interesting that the Herald's graphic in today's paper (showing what your net gain from the tax cuts minus GST hike would be) started the income at $30,000, despite over 50% of the population earning less than $30,000. Since $30k a year equaled about $2.59 more per week,?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:04:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152525#post152525</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152525#post152525</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I remember when I used to get outraged about people failing to adjust shit by CPI and drawing inappropriate conclusions from indicies.</p><p>Now, the frontline in the war on numeracy has shifted to "4 &ndash; 4 = 0, not 4 mutherfuckers!". Clearly, this is not going well.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:06:30 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152534#post152534</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152534#post152534</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>found it interesting that the Herald's graphic in today's paper (showing what your net gain from the tax cuts minus GST hike would be) started the income at $30,000,</p></blockquote><p>Recently 2500 people queuing for supermarket jobs was treated by our corporate media like a revelation from another country. Why should?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:22:20 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Just thinking</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152537#post152537</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152537#post152537</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Keith it clearly is a tax cut for those  whose income is beyond sufficent, let us call them "Fat Catz". The Fat Catz will have a substantial tax cut on income.<br />International flights are tax free, as is duty free. <br />Fat Catz will have substantially more money to spend in?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:28:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>JackElder</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152538#post152538</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152538#post152538</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						All cats look like tax cuts to me.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:31:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152539#post152539</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152539#post152539</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						This is why we need better numeracy standards!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:36:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152540#post152540</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152540#post152540</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/3311679/Key-no-GST-rise-video-emerges" target="_blank">And longer memories?</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:39:50 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>stephen clover</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152547#post152547</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152547#post152547</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Philip K Dick, <em>VALIS</em> chapter 2:</p><blockquote><p>No need existed to bait Fat with idle questions, such as, "If God can do anything can he create a ditch so wide he can't jump over it?" We had plenty of real questions that Fat couldn't field. Our friend Kevin always began his?</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:58:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Joshua Drummond</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152551#post152551</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152551#post152551</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Guys, it's simple. Look. Nice Mr Key was worried before the election that mean old Nanny Labour wouldn't let ordinary people have cheese. So he's gonna cut taxes so rich people can have more cheese, and jack up the tax on cheese. </p><p>Wait, what?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:02:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Just thinking</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152555#post152555</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152555#post152555</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Was that insightful and increasingly meaningful question asked by Radio NZs own Jane Patterson?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:13:16 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152556#post152556</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152556#post152556</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>But the cheese will be better incentivised for success, Joshua.<br />Fondue is our bright future.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:15:40 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>recordari</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152563#post152563</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152563#post152563</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Soufflé, surely?</p><p>Damn it, I already played my <em>Pride and Prejudice and Zombies</em> card, although it would have been near perfect in this case.  </p><p>And to think, not even a bite from our resident Austenite.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:23:05 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Samuel Scott</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152567#post152567</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152567#post152567</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>We could have GST exemption on only the best cheeses?</p><p>The thing which gets me about the rise in GST (and excuse me if this point has come up on a different thread) is that many people wont pay  much more GST at all. Those people are the GST registered?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:49:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Samuel Scott</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152568#post152568</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152568#post152568</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And in full disclosure, I am a GST registered sole trader musician who can claim the GST on the new Connan Mockasin album when I go out and buy it next week.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:50:18 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Just thinking</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152570#post152570</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152570#post152570</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciayqUMCViY&amp;feature=related" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciayqUMCViY&amp;feature=related</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:02:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152575#post152575</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152575#post152575</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>You don't have to register for GST if you earn below $30k</p></blockquote><p>Optional below 40k</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:05:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Robert Urquhart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152579#post152579</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152579#post152579</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Optional below 60k, as of the last budget.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:11:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152581#post152581</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152581#post152581</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Doh
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:17:09 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Samuel Scott</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152582#post152582</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152582#post152582</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Right $60k now....well that just makes it less likely that lower income earners would be registered, because it just seems like a hassle (and it kinda is).
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:20:46 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152584#post152584</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152584#post152584</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Keith, you really must stop indulging in such <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2_%2B_2_%3D_5" target="_blank">doubleplusbadthink</a>.</p><p>You're making it very difficult for our National Overlords and their MSM toadies to achieve the consensus reality we require in order to make New Zealand internationally competitive.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:22:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>recordari</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152590#post152590</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152590#post152590</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Since you mentioned it, I wanted to listen to it, and others might too, so here it is...  Are you payin' attention?  </p><p>PS NSFW.  Sorry, I forgot.<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lstDdzedgcE" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lstDdzedgcE</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:38:42 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nicola Kean</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152603#post152603</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152603#post152603</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://twitpic.com/12b5so" target="_blank">http://twitpic.com/12b5so</a></p><p>That is all.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:04:55 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>wendyf</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152626#post152626</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152626#post152626</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And of course, there's the rise in ACC levies. I'm wondering if the talk about an increase in GST is a cover for something else nasty that we haven't thought of. We'll be so relieved when the Masters tell us OK we've listened to the people and we're not going?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:20:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152632#post152632</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152632#post152632</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>a cover for something else nasty that we haven't thought of</p></blockquote><p>What, beneficiary bashing, national standards, tertiary student funding cuts and mining national parks aren't enough already?</p><p>They'll be increasing GST for sure &ndash; it's an easy large chunk of income whose compliance costs mainly fall on businesses and organisations.?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:35:01 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Robbie Siataga</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152641#post152641</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152641#post152641</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>buy a t shirt  ?</p><p> :)</p><p><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_JySddEdGkVY/SrsNjpbpW0I/AAAAAAAAATk/2gm14L6JuNc/s1600-h/zombie_revolution_screen.jpg" target="_blank">http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_JySddEdGkVY/SrsNjpbpW0I/AAAAAAAAATk/2gm14L6JuNc/s1600-h/zombie_revolution_screen.jpg</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:00:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152650#post152650</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152650#post152650</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>And it's small businesses, their owners, employees and suppliers who will suffer from any suppression of consumption in favour of 'saving' and 'investment'.</p></blockquote><p>Ah yes,. I did have to get out the hankie when One News trotted out a flat screen TV and a $60K car as case studies in?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:33:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152659#post152659</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152659#post152659</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>I did have to get out the hankie</p></blockquote><p>Me too &ndash; and none of the coverage seemed to do the obvious and find an item priced in multiples of $40 that would go up $1. Or better still, work out annualised costs for common expenses like power bills.</p><blockquote><p>voting for?</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:50:08 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152661#post152661</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152661#post152661</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Craig, are you arguing that because Labour did a bad thing, I can't criticise National for making it worse? Because that would be stupid, yet I can't find any other way to understand what you wrote.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:53:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152662#post152662</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152662#post152662</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Craig, are you arguing that because Labour did a bad thing, I can't criticise National for making it worse?</p></blockquote><p>Dude, that is his only argument. EVER.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:57:58 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152667#post152667</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152667#post152667</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Dude, that is his only argument. EVER.</p></blockquote><p>And your only response to anything I say is a snide bad-faith drive by.  Which reminds me I've not poked Master Bater over at Kiwiblog for a while...</p><blockquote><p>Craig, are you arguing that because Labour did a bad thing, I can't criticise National?</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:31:02 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152668#post152668</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152668#post152668</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>his only argument</p></blockquote><p>It's a weak card, but Craig does have others and is capable of playing them with style. I like it when he does.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:32:35 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152669#post152669</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152669#post152669</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thank you for fleshing that out, Craig. Do you think you could continue to do that in future? Because I'm afraid I really couldn't have inferred all that from your previous comment.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:36:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152670#post152670</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152670#post152670</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						GST increase will have only <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&amp;objectid=10625344&amp;pnum=0" target="_blank">minor temporary effect</a> judging by last time, say tax group head Bob Buckle, historian Paul Goldsmith and Retailers Association honcho John Alberton.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:37:33 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Christopher Nimmo</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152684#post152684</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152684#post152684</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>GST increase will have only minor temporary effect judging by last time, say tax group head Bob Buckle, historian Paul Goldsmith and Retailers Association honcho John Alberton.</p></blockquote><p>Yeah, but what do those people think they're saying? Of course a rise in GST only causes a 'small blip' in inflation. That's?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:41:44 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andy Fraser</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152692#post152692</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152692#post152692</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Keith, </p><p><br />The last para in your short post is very important. It puts these cuts into political persepctive. <br />I'd love to hear Cullen's private thoughts right now.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:20:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Just thinking</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152710#post152710</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152710#post152710</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						RNZs Panel had Brian Edwards says Bollards study of the 80's GST rise caused the ressession to last years longer due to reduced spending.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:28:59 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ethan Tucker</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152711#post152711</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152711#post152711</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Perhaps the Dompost editorial staff think they have a really, really expensive cat.  Like, one that's 666.67 times more valuable than the Six Million Dollar Man.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:29:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152712#post152712</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152712#post152712</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Yeah, but what do those people think they're saying?</p></blockquote><p>More to the point, if it's only going to have a minor transitory effect then why bother? Tell it to someone who buys food each week forever. Truthiness in the air..</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:29:38 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Keith Ng</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152722#post152722</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152722#post152722</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>buy a t shirt ?</p></blockquote><p>Sorry, but I already have my next politicised cartoon zombie t-shirt purchase sorted: <a href="http://www.topatoco.com/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&amp;Store_Code=TO&amp;Product_Code=RB-PRESIDENTS&amp;Category_Code=RB" target="_blank">Ben Franklin and the Dead Presidents doing Thriller</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:52:53 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152731#post152731</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152731#post152731</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Thank you for fleshing that out, Craig. Do you think you could continue to do that in future? Because I'm afraid I really couldn't have inferred all that from your previous comment.</p></blockquote><p>You're welcome &mdash; though I can't bloody win. Either it's "dude, you do bang on" or "well, that?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:37:56 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152736#post152736</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152736#post152736</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>and you can't register [for GST if] you are part of the PAYE tax system</p></blockquote><p>You cannot claim expenses incurred in earning income that has PAYE deducted. Which means you cannot register for and process GST if your income is solely wages/salary. If you're a sole-trader who has a part-time?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:25:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Caleb D&#039;Anvers</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152737#post152737</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152737#post152737</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It's a common mistake to think that, when Key says he is "embushus for Nyu Zillund," he actually means that he is "ambitious for New Zealand." The truth is that those words mean something else entirely. The phrase is perhaps best translated as "Bron and I are taking the kids?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:17:22 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Angus Robertson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152763#post152763</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152763#post152763</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>$0. That's what "revenue neutral" means.</p></blockquote><p>Ahem. </p><p>$12 million tax increase.  That's what "revenue neutral" really means.</p><blockquote><p>I remember when I used to get outraged about people failing to adjust shit by CPI and drawing inappropriate conclusions from indicies.</p></blockquote><p>Yeah... </p><p>($4b x CPI) &ndash; ($4b x LCI) = $12 million?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:39:43 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152771#post152771</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152771#post152771</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>  Wage and salary earners have no deductions available to them in relation to that income,</blockquote> Not quite true. Charitable donations and donations to schools are deductible but we were talking GST.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:11:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152826#post152826</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152826#post152826</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p><em>Wage and salary earners have no deductions available to them in relation to that income,</em></p><p>Not quite true. Charitable donations and donations to schools are deductible but we were talking GST.</p></blockquote><p>They're rebated, not deducted. That is, you claim them back from the IRD rather than putting them as deductions?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:14:19 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152874#post152874</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152874#post152874</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Idiot/Savant has done some more work on <a href="http://norightturn.blogspot.com/2010/02/some-facts-on-income-distribution-in.html" target="_blank">NZ's income distribution</a>, which highlights why our decision-makers are so out of touch.</p><blockquote><p>So, the median income is around the decile 5 boundary of $23,000 a year. But the median income for wage and salary earners for that year was $729 a week,?</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:34:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152876#post152876</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152876#post152876</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote>It's a common mistake to think that, when Key says he is "embushus for Nyu Zillund," he actually means that he is "ambitious for New Zealand." The truth is that those words mean something else entirely. The phrase is perhaps best translated as "Bron and I are taking the kids?</blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:50:00 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152890#post152890</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152890#post152890</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Idiot/Savant has done some more work on NZ's income distribution,</p></blockquote><p>Thanks, Sacha. I'd read that this morning and then driven myself mad trying to find it again somewhere in <em>Keith's</em> last four columns.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:27:34 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>stephen clover</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152904#post152904</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152904#post152904</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>which highlights why our decision-makers are so out of touch</p></blockquote><p>In using the term "out of touch", I feel that you're being quite.. umm.. what is it?  Polite?  Kind?  Generous?  Strategic?</p><p>C'mon.  No one actually believes that it is some kind of <em>omission</em>, or <em>accident</em>, that they're throwing around terms?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:42:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152928#post152928</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152928#post152928</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						And <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/3319485/SFO-investigates-couple-after-millions-disappear" target="_blank">here</a> is a glimpse of the sort of sunlit uplands of investment opportunities that New Zealand's business class offers us all once/if the government forces people out of property...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:29:52 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152931#post152931</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152931#post152931</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>In using the term "out of touch", I feel that you're being quite.. umm.. what is it? Polite? Kind? Generous? Strategic?</p></blockquote><p>I'll take the first three &ndash; for novelty value, you understand :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:50:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>stephen clover</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152966#post152966</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152966#post152966</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hahaha, in keeping with the spirit of the site ;)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:06:51 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stephen Judd</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152995#post152995</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=152995#post152995</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/6686131" target="_blank">Neoliberalism for children</a></p><p>Includes enjoyable homebrew analogue computing.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:23:39 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>George  Darroch</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=153005#post153005</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=153005#post153005</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hey, don't be too hard on Key. It's not just him being ambitious for his country</p><p> <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/be-like-the-kiwis-says-abbott--but-they-cant-fly-20100211-nv6k.html" target="_blank">Australian opposition leader Tony Abbott wants to catch up with New Zealand</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:26:57 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Cecelia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=153018#post153018</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=153018#post153018</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Mr Key declined to comment directly on the Herald reader survey on the basis that it was "not scientific".</p><p>Labour leader Phil Goff also questioned whether the survey reflected wider opinion.</p></blockquote><p>I thought John Key's response to the Herald Readers' Survey on the GST increase was halfway decent. After all,?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 07:19:04 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mark Bennett</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=153021#post153021</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=153021#post153021</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						um, a little late, but just wanted to comment on the strangely uncharitable interpretation that the first three commentators made of Craig's initial comment. There's nothing wrong in holding people accountable to the values they espouse &ndash; in fact, that's a very good thing to do...  he was clearly not?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:05:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=156716#post156716</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=156716#post156716</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Has anyone gasped &ndash; or grasped &ndash; at the headline the other day about the <a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/BU0910/S00243.htm " target="_blank"> Deriviatives Market</a> the NZX is about to set up?? And <a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/BU1003/S00224.htm " target="_blank">here</a></p><p>Why are "we" doing this? Why are "we" allowing this? I can't believe that NZ has failed to grasp the fact?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:55:12 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=156731#post156731</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/onpoint-tax-cut-zombies/?p=156731#post156731</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Anyone on PS got any shares they want to part with?</p></blockquote><p>Yours for 220c if you're buying, my son.</p><p>Although a broker might get you a better price:<a href="http://companyresearch.nzx.com/corporate/NZX/icentre.php?menu=NZX" target="_blank">NZX</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:32:45 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
