<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Up Front: How About Now?</title>
		<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Public Address</copyright>
			
			
			

			
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220838#post220838</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220838#post220838</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:06:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220839#post220839</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220839#post220839</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Here, also, is a list of how MPs voted on the Civil Union bill.</q></p><p>I don't know whether that's entirely reliable on marriage equality, since there was a thick (and IMO enormously distasteful) strain of "hell, you fags have marriage in all but name STFU already" &mdash; which is not?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:06:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220840#post220840</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220840#post220840</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh, absolutely. If you combine the Civil Union and Marriage (Gender Equality) Amendment Bill votes, you can certainly pick people who <em>won't</em> be supporting gay marriage.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:10:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Megan Wegan</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220842#post220842</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220842#post220842</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Having recently become a marriage and CU celebrant, the "in all but name" argument really annoys me. It bugs the hell out of me that I had to apply separately to do both. </p><p>Because if they were "the same", I shouldn't have to do that. The legislation governing them would?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:18:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220846#post220846</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220846#post220846</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If you combine the Civil Union and Marriage (Gender Equality) Amendment Bill votes, you can certainly pick people who won?t be supporting gay marriage.</q></p><p>That's a fair point, but the marriage equality vote in New York only passed because four GOP state senators with less than encouraging track records crossed?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:40:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Dylan Reeve</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220855#post220855</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220855#post220855</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>So, what about a referendum then? Obviously it would be a while before it could be voted on, but why not? If Family First can get enough people for that stupid smacking referendum then I surely this shouldn't be too hard? </p><p>And, handily Family First could continue to use their?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:03:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Beard</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220859#post220859</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220859#post220859</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Please don't think I'm trolling for saying this, but I don't support same-sex marriage because I don't support such unnatural lifestyles. By which of course I mean "marriage".</p><p>I'm not just saying that from some cynical divorcé's perspective (though there is that). Of course I support the right of people?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:19:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220865#post220865</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220865#post220865</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I was wrong, and I know this for sure now because we actually have polling data.</q></p><p>I think you?ve missed a crucial point here ? which is the change in attitudes to same-sex marriage since civil unions became law.</p><p>From <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/civil-unions/news/article.cfm?c_id=565&amp;objectid=3597388" target="_blank">the Herald, 2004</a>:</p><p><q>The report included a Herald-DigiPoll survey of 750?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:42:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220867#post220867</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220867#post220867</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Please don?t think I?m trolling for saying this, but I don?t support same-sex marriage because I don?t support such unnatural lifestyles. By which of course I mean ?marriage?.</q></p><p>Do you remember that early in the CUB debate there was a group called Lesbians Who Don't Want a Bar of It?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:44:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220874#post220874</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220874#post220874</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>According to the new poll, support has increased by 50%. Even allowing that some old people have died since, and the general shift to acceptance in western countries, it does seem to me that civil unions have done the job many of us hoped they would.</q></p><p>And this is one?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:55:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220875#post220875</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220875#post220875</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Do you remember that early in the CUB debate there was a group called Lesbians Who Don't Want a Bar of It?</q></p><p>And my response to such groups is the same as my response to bigots and others attempting to impose their particular values on everyone else: if you don't?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:55:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220876#post220876</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220876#post220876</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>But I'd rather see the definition of civil unions extended (or some entirely new set of "unions" defined) to provide people with legal recognition of their relationships, and leave it up to them to choose whatever social, cultural or religious definitions of "marriage" suits them as a celebration of their?</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:56:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220878#post220878</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220878#post220878</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>ut by just expanding the definition of ?marriage? from ?one man and one woman in an emotionally and sexually exclusive relationship for the rest of their life? to include same-sex pairings doesn?t include all the diversity of human bonds that might benefit from such protections.</q></p><p>And I am, of course,?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:01:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Hannah</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220880#post220880</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220880#post220880</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>But by just expanding the definition of ?marriage? from ?one man and one woman in an emotionally and sexually exclusive relationship for the rest of their life?...</q></p><p>Wait, that's the definition of Marriage? Damn there's a lot of people who need to be reading the fine print.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:04:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220881#post220881</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220881#post220881</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Do you remember that early in the CUB debate there was a group called Lesbians Who Don't Want a Bar of It?</q></p><p>At the time I said that anyone who tried to pull a shotgun wedding on any dyke of my acquaintance would live to rue the day.  Not long?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:08:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220882#post220882</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220882#post220882</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>But I?d rather see the definition of civil unions extended (or some entirely new set of ?unions? defined) to provide people with legal recognition of their relationships, and leave it up to them to choose whatever social, cultural or religious definitions of ?marriage? suits them as a celebration of their?</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:16:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220886#post220886</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220886#post220886</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Wait, that?s the definition of Marriage? Damn there?s a lot of people who need to be reading the fine print.</q></p><p>Personally I?m in favour of getting back to the <em>truly</em> traditional ?formally acknowledge people who want to profitably combine their assets and establish kinship bonds between their extended families, the?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:26:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220888#post220888</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220888#post220888</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Personally I?m in favour of getting back to the truly traditional ?formally acknowledge people who want to profitably combine their assets and establish kinship bonds between their extended families, the results to be invested in their mutual heirs? definition</q></p><p>Could we manage something where you can opt to explicitly NOT?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:29:08 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gee</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220891#post220891</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220891#post220891</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q> Why aren't we saying, very loudly and publicly, you know what? Yous were wrong about Homosexual Law Reform. Yous were wrong about Civil Unions. The sky didn't fall. In fact, nothing bad happened at all. You're also wrong about same-sex marriage. Our current marriage law is unjust, it's unfair, it's?</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:07:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220892#post220892</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220892#post220892</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Could we manage something where you can opt to explicitly NOT ?establish kinship bonds between extended families?? Because that would be? quite useful.</q></p><p>Have them live on different islands. It's a good start. I imagine different countries would work even better.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:08:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220898#post220898</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220898#post220898</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hi Emma.</p><p><q>So really, the only way a party refusing to support same-sex marriage makes any sense is if their target voters are old.</q></p><p>I'm nitpicking, but to me it makes perfect sense for a party to oppose same-sex marriage if that's what its members (and donars) want.</p><p>Target voters?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:17:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220900#post220900</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220900#post220900</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Have them live on different islands. It's a good start. I imagine different countries would work even better.</q></p><p>It's been my solution for years. It's not as good as it seems &ndash; you end up forking out big time for airfares, and going nowhere else for holidays.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:22:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220904#post220904</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220904#post220904</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The only reason for a party to change its policy for voters is if those voters suddenly start making it an issue and saying they'll switch support because of it.</q></p><p>Which is what we need to start doing.  Asking candidates for their position is the first step in this.  But?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:29:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220906#post220906</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220906#post220906</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Because I am, of course, an ideologically-bankrupt incrementalist. </q></p><p>We really need to work out  secret handshake for that club.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:37:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220907#post220907</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220907#post220907</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						An incremental handshake? Starts really weak, then gets stronger?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:47:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220908#post220908</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220908#post220908</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm in favour of it. However, there's a difference between substantive equality issues like transgender legal equality and inclusive adoption reform that means that they need to precede any moves to introduce SSM proper. Still, at least we don't have to have a campaign to remove a ridiculous pre-emptive legislative?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:48:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Greville Whittle</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220913#post220913</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220913#post220913</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>My view is that marriage should be availible all couples regardless of gender. It sticks in my craw that I could get married simply because the person I happen to love is female, and my sister can't marry her partner because they have a penis-free relationship.</p><p>The law discriminates, it's?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:58:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220916#post220916</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220916#post220916</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The only reason for a party to change its policy for voters is if those voters suddenly start making it an issue and saying they?ll switch support because of it.</q></p><p>Well, not quite &ndash; and honestly, I rather doubt that the GOP state senators who flipped their votes because thousands?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:05:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220917#post220917</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220917#post220917</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>However, there?s a difference between substantive equality issues like transgender legal equality and inclusive adoption reform that means that they need to precede any moves to introduce SSM proper. </q></p><p>Can I call "why don't we focus on the real issues?" bingo on that?  I didn't see how adoption law reform?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:08:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220921#post220921</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220921#post220921</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It?s been my solution for years. It?s not as good as it seems ? you end up forking out big time for airfares, and going nowhere else for holidays.</q></p><p>Move to the other side of the world, and be too poor to go back very often. </p><p>(But, yeah, I hear?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:29:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220932#post220932</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220932#post220932</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm in agreement with Lucy, and Craig. Adoption law reform and transgender legal equality are somewhat different issues to the redefinition of marriage under the law to include same sex couples. As Lucy says, once the inequities in the Marriage Act are dealt to, surely adoption reform follows on. And?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:27:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Beard</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220938#post220938</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220938#post220938</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Well, you know that I'm far from libertarian on most things, but the field of intimate personal relationships is different. There are certain aspects of "marriage" as it's currently defined all through the law that certainly should be subject to legal rights and responsibilities, but those rights and responsibilities are?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 20:15:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220939#post220939</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220939#post220939</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It's been my solution for years. It's not as good as it seems &ndash; you end up forking out big time for airfares, and going nowhere else for holidays.</q></p><p>You also don't have regular baby-sitters. Much of my first 10 years of parenting I was known as the person who?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 20:32:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tansy</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220945#post220945</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220945#post220945</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hi Emma and everyone else!<br />First, it is definitely time for marriage equality and these poll results afre incredibly heartening.  I had suspected that NZers were fairly apathetic about same sex marriage but it looks like this isn't the case after all.<br />I'm de-lurking after following this blog for a?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:48:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Raymond A Francis</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220948#post220948</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220948#post220948</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Does anybody have a figure for the number of civil unions that have ended in divorce, I seem to remember that it is quite high<br />I do know that there were 273 civil unions (73% same sex) last year compared with 2100 marriages<br />Personally I don't see why there is?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 22:18:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220955#post220955</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220955#post220955</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Does anybody have a figure for the number of civil unions that have ended in divorce, I seem to remember that it is quite high</q></p><p>According to the December 2010 marriage stats, there had been 2214 civil unions in NZ since 2005, of which only 51 had ended in divorce.?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:02:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>izogi</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220958#post220958</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220958#post220958</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Personally I don't see why there is such a drive for marriage</q></p><p>At least for my partner and I, the two driving factors for getting married were easier recognition overseas, and for the parents.  Neither of us are at all religious, but the parents are, and both sides saw 'marriage'?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:27:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220962#post220962</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220962#post220962</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Without either of those two reasons, I?d personally have been happy to just live together as a de facto couple or at most join the Civil Union crowd.</q></p><p>Personally, I'd have gone for a civil union, but the overseas recognition was the kicker: I wanted to come to the US?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 03:33:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220963#post220963</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220963#post220963</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Personally I don?t see why there is such a drive for marriage</q></p><p>Jackie might want to put her hands over her ears :), but every time I hear that from (presumably) straight folks I think there?s a wee bit of heterosexist privilege-denying up in the room.  I?ll just post a?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 06:32:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220964#post220964</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220964#post220964</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						It would also be worth pointing out that when my parents got married, the Republic of South Africa still had the Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act 55 on the statute books, where it would remain until 1990. It had also been just over <em>five years</em> since the US Supreme Court?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 07:06:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220965#post220965</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220965#post220965</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Clearly, it is time to deploy Phase 2 of the Homosexual Agenda.</q></p><p>Oh, good. I need a new toaster oven.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 07:10:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gee</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220967#post220967</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220967#post220967</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q> Just look at the numbers people, and it seems like a no-brainer to me that fewer people would dissolve their marriages if we reverted to a lengthy and very expensive process where you?re required to air all your spunk-stained linen in an open court. With details in the next day?s?</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 07:17:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gee</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220968#post220968</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220968#post220968</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks for sharing that, Tansy. I now have a reply from one Central Christchurch candidate ready to share on the website once it's up. Hopefully, the other candidates will respond too....
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 07:21:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Megan Wegan</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220970#post220970</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220970#post220970</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Personally I don?t see why there is such a drive for marriage</q></p><p>For one of the (heterosexual) couples I am marrying, they wanted a civil union, but are getting married because they didn't think their family would think a CU was as legitimate. </p><p>Despite the "in all but name" bollocks,?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 07:45:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220972#post220972</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220972#post220972</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I know you?re exaggerating here</q></p><p>Gee: I was being extremely sarcastic. Hypocritical marriage equality opponents like Newt Gingrich deserve all the mockery they get ? after all, he ?respects the institution of marriage? so much, he?s done it three times and his serial adultery (the third time when his now-wife?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:20:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Megan Wegan</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220973#post220973</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220973#post220973</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Hell, I just want the one civil marriage, and my partner of fifteen years and I don?t have an ?open? relationship. So, could folks like Newt STFU now?</q></p><p>I still get to perform it, right?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:24:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Gee</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220975#post220975</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220975#post220975</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Hell, I just want the one civil marriage..... So, could folks like Newt STFU now?</q></p><p>With you all the way on that one.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:40:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220984#post220984</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220984#post220984</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I hope this post doesn't seem too much like spam or advertising. *is nervous*</q></p><p>No way, it's relevant and there's no "no link whoring" policy here anyway. Welcome.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:00:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220988#post220988</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220988#post220988</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You also don't have regular baby-sitters. Much of my first 10 years of parenting I was known as the person who never went out on Saturday night.</q></p><p>Heh, I've taken to inviting people over when I'm on babysitting detail. Has big advantages &ndash; no driving home at the end.</p><p>But?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:07:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DeepRed</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220991#post220991</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220991#post220991</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The only argument against I have any time for is ?faggots and dykes together, ewwww!? because its at least honest.</q></p><p>Exactly. For all their ugliness, we know where blue-collar bigots stand, which makes it easy to poke fun at them. I find the scariest bigots to be the crypto ones?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:15:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220995#post220995</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220995#post220995</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>    I know you?re exaggerating here</p><p>Gee: I was being extremely sarcastic.</q></p><p>Correct me if I'm wrong, Craig &ndash; were you saying that worrying about divorce amongst gays would only make sense if it were also accompanied by a serious attempt to reduce divorce amongst straights. Your suggestion of raising the?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:30:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220997#post220997</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=220997#post220997</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I?ve only put the wild and wasteful ocean between myself and the in-laws ? my own parents are available for babysitting.</q></p><p>I think I have won the day here by having my... interesting... mother-in-law 7000 miles away and my own sainted mother literally next door.</p><p>My own wedding was the?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:45:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221010#post221010</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221010#post221010</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Oh darling, it's okay. Getting married <em>is</em> about privilege. I can well remember the early days of HIV and AIDS here when partners were unable to attend to their lovers in hospital, or even to arrange their funerals. It was all so dependent on the "goodwill" of the families. So?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:04:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221023#post221023</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221023#post221023</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> <em>Clearly, it is time to deploy Phase 2 of the Homosexual Agenda.</em></p><p>Oh, good. I need a new toaster oven.</q></p><p>The rewards system has been updated. You have to get six times as many stamps, but you get an iPad in the end.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:23:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221046#post221046</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221046#post221046</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It was really unexpectedly meaningful. Fuck anyone who wants to deny people that, if they want it.</q></p><p>I had a catholic wedding, so some of the things that were said were just silly (me being agnostic and all). It was expensive and OTT. But it was also one of the?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:15:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221049#post221049</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221049#post221049</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>you get an iPad in the end</q></p><p>Sooner rather than later, if you go to a <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10739410" target="_blank">decile 9 school</a> in Orewa.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:26:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221051#post221051</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221051#post221051</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ben:</p><p>Just to clarify: I?m not suggesting we set the <a href="http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/1966/divorce-and-separation/1" target="_blank">clock back to 1857</a>, but I?m rather surprised that the brave defenders of ?traditional marriage? don?t.  I?d also be cynical enough to suggest that a good proportion of them don?t do so because 1) doing down the fags is a?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:36:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221055#post221055</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221055#post221055</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If you're a moral conservative with a grain of principle, it seems bleeding obvious to me that no-fault divorce (and the erosion of the social and legal stigma attached) is more of a threat to "the institution of traditional marriage and the family" than marriage equality. </q></p><p>Not so sure about?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:48:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221061#post221061</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221061#post221061</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Actually I want to refine that further. Marriage equality is not "no threat". It's also <em>good</em> for marriage and the family. Happy people who love each other make better families. Children of happy gay marriage have a great chance to be happy children. Children of happy non-marriage are the same.?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:08:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221075#post221075</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221075#post221075</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						In terms of adoption law reform and transgender equality taking precedence (i) the trans community has had to wait too damned long for it as it is and (ii) inclusive adoption reform is the last same-sex parenting reform to be undertaken, as well as the last piece of substantive LGBT?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:30:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221105#post221105</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221105#post221105</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>In terms of adoption law reform and transgender equality taking precedence (i) the trans community has had to wait too damned long for it as it is and (ii) inclusive adoption reform is the last same-sex parenting reform to be undertaken, as well as the last piece of substantive LGBT?</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:02:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221113#post221113</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221113#post221113</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>basic safety</q></p><p>Haven't been following closely, but perhaps you could point me to an explanation about this angle.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:41:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221117#post221117</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221117#post221117</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>the median age of marriage at divorce is 13.7 years</q></p><p>Interesting. Any figures on how that has changed over the last few decades?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:47:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Idiot Savant</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221119#post221119</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221119#post221119</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Interesting. Any figures on how that has changed over the last few decades?</q></p><p>Its gone up, from 12.4 years in 1988.  Check out the tables <a href="http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/people_and_communities/marriages-civil-unions-and-divorces/MarriagesCivilUnionsandDivorces_HOTPYeDec10/Commentary.aspx" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:52:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221127#post221127</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221127#post221127</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The rewards system has been updated. You have to get six times as many stamps, but you get an iPad in the end.</q></p><p>Black or are they doing a special colour?</p><p><q>The adoption thing I think is more complex because the entire Adoption Act needs revamping, for a whole bunch?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:36:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221147#post221147</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221147#post221147</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Okay. I think this is a case of ?putting the worst inequalities first? versus ?doing the easy stuff first?. Neither of which approach is ?wrong?. And these are all things we want done.</q></p><p>It's also a case of Craig not really caring that much about marriage equality, as opposed to?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:48:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>StuartBradbury</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221196#post221196</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221196#post221196</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The significant differences are ... by age. Over 55 is the only category where support drops below half*, to 44% in favour and 49% opposed.</p><p>&mdash; Doesn't that demographic pretty accurately describe our parliamentarians? ... and any vote on this issue is a 'conscience vote' ... so isn't the result?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 05:59:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221197#post221197</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221197#post221197</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The significant differences are ? by age. Over 55 is the only category where support drops below half*, to 44% in favour and 49% opposed.</p><p>? Doesn?t that demographic pretty accurately describe our parliamentarians? ? and any vote on this issue is a ?conscience vote? ? so isn?t the result?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:41:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Phil Lyth</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221204#post221204</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221204#post221204</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The ZM Morning Crew's SAME SEX &amp; THE CITY</p><p>On July 24th gay marriage will become legal in New York State, so now we want to send the first New Zealanders to New York City to get married!!  </q></p><p>So a radio station is running a <a href="http://www.zmonline.com/WhatsOn/Competitions/Detail.aspx?id=18258" target="_blank">contest</a> to send a gay couple?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:14:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221207#post221207</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221207#post221207</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hell, I'm still trying to understand why four right-wing Republican NY state senators (and Dubya's solicitor-general!) get it and our Parliament doesn't.  I just know this for sure: If Australia passes marriage equality legislation before we do, the shame will be unendurable. :)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:36:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221211#post221211</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221211#post221211</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I honestly don?t think the result would be as predictable as you assume.</q></p><p>Quite &ndash; and I think it's a pertinent factoid that the first serious (if flawed) attempt at homosexual law reform was in the name of Venn Young &ndash; who was fifty five at the time.  In the?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:50:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221222#post221222</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221222#post221222</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I?ve certainly seen little evidence that there?s some straight line causual relationship between age and homophobia; it?s a wee bit more complicated than that.</q></p><p>Yeah, there's a lot of space between "is against gay marriage on a survey" and "homophobic", which can be filled with some quite complex (and potentially?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:50:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221227#post221227</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221227#post221227</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'd just like to remind those of our younger viewers that 55 isn't that old. Ahem.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:19:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221235#post221235</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221235#post221235</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Unless you're Maori or Pacific men, where it's sometimes treated as a threshold age in social policy &ndash; worth remembering when people talk about raising pension eligibility to 67.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:44:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221237#post221237</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221237#post221237</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Well yes, I had a conversation with one of our Kuia ? who is, it should be said <em>5 years my junior</em> where she remarked that she thought it would be okay to die at 60, because it was goodly age. I was gobsmacked.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:47:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221242#post221242</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221242#post221242</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Considering how damned easy it is to get married, practically all you have to do is say ?I do? and spend a few minutes signing some papers, I don?t think the divorce ceremony should be any harder.</q></p><p>Correct me if I am wrong but the whole ?till death us do?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:06:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221244#post221244</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221244#post221244</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I always think the death do us part thing is very hopeful. And people mean it when they say it, I would imagine. I  never said it, and here I am, till the bitter end,  anyway. How the hell did that happen?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:13:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221247#post221247</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221247#post221247</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Correct me if I am wrong but the whole ?till death us do part? bit is supposed to mean something when you say ?I do? otherwise it is a bit pointless, innit?.</q></p><p>But you don't have to say that, any more than I had to promise to obey. </p><p><q>Doesn?t that?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:14:43 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221248#post221248</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221248#post221248</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I would imagine. I  never said it, and here I am, till the bitter end,  anyway. How the hell did that happen?</q></p><p>Cos you're Luverly.<br />;-)<br />Anyone up for Drinkies on Thursday evening @ Te Neigbouhood?.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:15:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221249#post221249</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221249#post221249</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'll be in Fiji, my darling. But it does seem like forever since I saw your lovely visages. Next Thursday?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:22:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221253#post221253</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221253#post221253</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Next Thursday will be fine, I look forward to beholding your bronzed self. ;-)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:38:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221265#post221265</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221265#post221265</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Most of the promises are pointless and symbolic only. If you can't naturally choose to do what's in the vows, then a solemn vow won't make a lick of difference, and enforcement of them is patently stupid &ndash; being parted by death is a recipe for murderous thoughts.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 12:52:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221267#post221267</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221267#post221267</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						you're so romantic, Ben
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:00:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221268#post221268</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221268#post221268</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>being parted by death is a recipe for murderous thoughts.</q></p><p>How's the Mrs. ?<br />;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:06:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221276#post221276</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221276#post221276</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Just fine, although she daily violates the Obey vow. There's probably some biblical punishment I could exact, involving goats and a bastinado, but I'm a wee bit concerned about the truly epic punishments they mete out for my own transgressions, the main ones being my heresy, idolatry, covetousness, blasphemy and?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:29:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221294#post221294</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221294#post221294</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Craig R:<br />Wrong. I do support marriage equality, but the civil union debate took the heat out of the issue, as well as securing us relationship equality legislation (Relationships Statutory References Ac5 2005).  I just don't think that it should take precedence over transgender equality and adoption reform, which seem?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:34:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221300#post221300</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221300#post221300</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>you're so romantic, Ben</q></p><p>Hey, I grinned and bore it, even learned the Lord's Prayer (backwards!). In fact, I had to put up with more than most &ndash; the Church required us to take pre-marital counseling, which actually turned out to be a good idea. Nut out some of the?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:51:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221304#post221304</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221304#post221304</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I just don?t think that it should take precedence over transgender equality and adoption reform</q></p><p>You?re not getting any argument from me or anyone else on that, because this ain?t the line for Barbara Streisand tickets.  Does it really have to be a zero-sum game here?  (BTW, if I'm ever?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:14:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221308#post221308</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221308#post221308</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hmmm I'm wondering if I should STFU about Catholic weddings on this thread. I hope my tolerance of their beliefs isn't extrapolated to their considerable intolerance towards the main topic of this thread. On that, they need a big wake up. Apologies to anyone feeling like telling me I'm an?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:45:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221311#post221311</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221311#post221311</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Apologies to anyone feeling like telling me I?m an insensitive arsehole </q></p><p>Your nothing like one. My non catholic sister is about to do the mandatory catholic pre-marital counseling and I was a little concerned about what she'd be subjected to, thanks for the info Ben.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:10:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221312#post221312</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221312#post221312</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Well my advice to her is to keep in mind that if they, for some reason, decide not to "pass" her, then it's their loss, and there's plenty more venues out there, and secular ceremonies. If her partner lets religion come between them, then it's way better to know that?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:26:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221313#post221313</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221313#post221313</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> but you get an iPad in the end.</q></p><p>Just been thinking about this and that's a really bad place to put an iPad...</p><p></coat_hat><br /></html></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:40:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221315#post221315</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221315#post221315</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q></coat_hat><br /></html></q></p><p>you missed a </body></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:10:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>chris</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221317#post221317</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221317#post221317</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Thanks Ben, I hadn't cottoned on to the fact it was a pass/fail situation, she's a car length more diplomatic than me so fingers crossed she'll be fine.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:59:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221319#post221319</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221319#post221319</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						My brother ? who is an atheist ? went through the Catholic pre-marriage course because ? obviously! ? his first wife was a Catholic. He had difficulties with ?You promise to bring any children up as Catholics? but ? since his wife-to-be said ?Of course? there wasnt a problem?I *think*?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:56:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jeremy Andrew</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221323#post221323</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221323#post221323</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						We had pre-marriage counselling from the very lovely multi-denominational pastor at the University Chapel (we both worked at the Uni at the time, we weren't (quite) that young). I remember stuff all about it, but I suppose since it was 15 years ago, they'd be happy to take some credit?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:38:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221324#post221324</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221324#post221324</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It was a hasty exit, not a well-formed one.</p><p>Besides, the coat was covering the body :-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:48:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221326#post221326</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221326#post221326</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						seems valid enough
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 22:21:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Isabel Hitchings</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221327#post221327</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221327#post221327</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Also, another session, more of a lecture, raised the concept of contraception, and promoted the ?rhythm method? </q></p><p>Did they teach the "count to 14" version of the rhythm method (which is truly laughable) or actual, proper Natural Family Planning (which is actually remarkably effective when done properly)?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 22:36:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221337#post221337</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221337#post221337</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I don't recall. Was that something to do with timing the ovulations, or was it a suggestion to count slowly to 14 when dangerous moods came upon one? IOW a variant on the "cold shower method", or the one boys learn at puberty "think of something boring". </p><p>Natural Family Planning?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 09:39:05 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DeepRed</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221339#post221339</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221339#post221339</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Natural Family Planning probably is effective when done properly. Abstinence is, too. But no method is really effective when doing it properly becomes difficult, either because natural urges are too strong, or the system or equipment is too tricky. I've personally had quite a high failure rate with condoms.</q></p><p>Which?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 09:56:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221344#post221344</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221344#post221344</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I?ve personally had quite a high failure rate with condoms.</q></p><p>If you buy a smaller size, they don't slip off so easily.</p><p>I'm told.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:28:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221348#post221348</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221348#post221348</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Regarding vows, I think there's a lot of value in working out what exactly you are both expecting from the relationship and under what circumstances you'd want to leave it.  You don't need to get married to have that conversation.</p><p>I lived with a partner for some years in a?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:47:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221365#post221365</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221365#post221365</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						That sounds like a myth. And the problem isn't it coming off, it's more "can't get it on" or "it breaks" or "it hurts" or "I'd rather not even bother, I like you and everything but no thanks". It's a pity, really, and I envy people who can enjoy using?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:49:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221368#post221368</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221368#post221368</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I envy people who can enjoy using one. Sort of.</q></p><p>I've always wondered if the Love Capsule was less bothersome to circumcised men than to un-.  Without getting unduly personal, I'd love to know if that's the case!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:07:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221370#post221370</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221370#post221370</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I'm sure relationship counselling can help bring these issues out in the open.</q></p><p>If the parties going in are actually trying to make it work, yes. Counselors can't help people who don't actually want to be helped. Well, not much, anyway.</p><p><q>But if I had known that his commitment was?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:17:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221371#post221371</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221371#post221371</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Without getting unduly personal, I'd love to know if that's the case!</q></p><p>Me too, actually, I've often wondered about that.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:18:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221372#post221372</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221372#post221372</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I?ve written hundreds of words that I?ve just now deleted, because it could be too personal for you.</q></p><p>You could always send me an email, Ben.</p><p>And yes of course nobody can predict what might happen in the future...but if one of you is expecting things to change, that expectation?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:20:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221373#post221373</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221373#post221373</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Without getting unduly personal, I'd love to know if that's the case!</q></p><p>Theoretically, it does seem to make a certain amount of sense. I am also curious. </p><p>And... yeah. One thing you realise when doing a lot of reading about and mixing with BDSM and polyamorous people is that the?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:33:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221374#post221374</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221374#post221374</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						True, I usually forget that. But I'm not aiming to lecture or counsel you, just to speak publicly about my perceptions of counseling (which I'm going through now, so it's fresh in the mind).
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:33:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221376#post221376</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221376#post221376</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yes, there's always a tension between what one wants and what is practical. Undying love is a lovely idea, an excellent subject for fiction, usually the tragic kind. The more common kind, involving flawed humans with changing lives and minds, involves a lot of muddling along.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:38:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221377#post221377</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221377#post221377</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>?Love is not love that changes with the flight of time? (I might have that slightly wrong, it?s from memory.) What utter bollocks. People change with time. So does love, that?s one of the great things about it. It has to be able to flex, or it?d break.</q></p><p>Yeah, everything?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:41:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221380#post221380</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221380#post221380</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Counselors can?t help people who don?t actually want to be helped.</q></p><p>How many therapists does it take to change a lightbulb?<br />.<br />.<br />.<br />.<br />One, but it has to want to change. ;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:49:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221382#post221382</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221382#post221382</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The counseling I'm doing currently is career stuff, but it's quite interesting how many parallels there are between work and love. They both involve investing a lot of your time and mental/emotional energy into them. They can both change. You can be wrong about both of them. They both go?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:51:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221384#post221384</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221384#post221384</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>And Ben, yeah, I think counsellors are a mixed bunch of people, the bad or unsuitable ones can do more harm than good.</q></p><p>Totally. I guess that's my main reservation &ndash; mostly counseling is about helping yourself, something to bear in mind at all times. The Catholic marriage counseling was?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:00:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Stewart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221385#post221385</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221385#post221385</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						With regard to <em>everything</em>  changing over time, that is one of the 'secrets' of the longer relationships; allowing for your loved one to change, and for you to change, too, but at the same time <em>working</em>  on the relationship to take the changes in your stride.  I think a lot?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:08:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221387#post221387</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221387#post221387</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>One thing you realise when doing a lot of reading about and mixing with BDSM and polyamorous people is that the practice of talking about things in a much more explicit manner than most vanilla couples do is really useful.</q></p><p>It's one of the most useful things about reading your?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:19:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221388#post221388</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221388#post221388</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I've always admired a friend of mine who married when she was 16 (I think the husband might have been 17) and continued to make her relationship work for about 25 years, through growing up themselves and child-rearing and losing a child and serious illness and recovery and finally divorce;?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:23:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221390#post221390</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221390#post221390</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It?s one of the most useful things about reading your work, too. Your frankness on sexual matters makes for a much deeper look at a lot of things.</q></p><p>Wow, thank you Ben. I dunno if people believe me when I say it, but what I want mostly is for people,?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:39:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Megan Wegan</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221392#post221392</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221392#post221392</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Her: Oh, you should see your face.<br />Me: Hey, I just? I wasn?t expecting the word ?blowjob? to appear in that sentence.</q></p><p>Which frankly, still surprises me.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:50:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221393#post221393</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221393#post221393</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Which frankly, still surprises me.</q></p><p>Yeah, sorry, I dunno where my head was at.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:54:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221394#post221394</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221394#post221394</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I dunno where my head was at.</q></p><p><cough></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:56:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221396#post221396</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221396#post221396</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>See, interesting, because I tend to consider talking about sex pretty much a waste of time unless it?s in a mixed group, and the more mixed (by gender, sexual preference, etc) the better.</q></p><p>That's cool too, I don't disagree. I just think that you get some pretty interesting insights when?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:57:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221397#post221397</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221397#post221397</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> For instance, how many people on your last thread on prostitution spoke of their own personal experiences?</q></p><p>Yeah, that's different because it's public. But I've certainly had conversations with male friends of mine about their encounters with prostitutes. And we've had conversations over at <a href="http://theladygarden.org/2011/07/13/hark-a-glaring-double-standard/#comments" target="_blank">The Lady Garden</a> (that's the one?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:07:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221402#post221402</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221402#post221402</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Also, it is possible that my experience is atypical, and people just tell me stuff.</q></p><p>Probable, even. I think the fact that you go first helps a lot.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:43:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Isabel Hitchings</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221409#post221409</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221409#post221409</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>?ve always wondered if the Love Capsule was less bothersome to circumcised men than to un-. Without getting unduly personal, I?d love to know if that?s the case!</q></p><p>From what I've seen it's more that it presents a different set of difficulties.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:36:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Isabel Hitchings</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221410#post221410</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221410#post221410</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Natural Family Planning probably is effective when done properly. Abstinence is, too. But no method is really effective when doing it properly becomes difficult, either because natural urges are too strong, or the system or equipment is too tricky. I?ve personally had quite a high failure rate with condoms.</q></p><p>Done?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:53:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Isabel Hitchings</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221411#post221411</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221411#post221411</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You can love each other like crazy and still not be able to make it work.</q></p><p>Ain't that the truth.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 15:55:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221414#post221414</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221414#post221414</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Yeah, the contraceptive pill and I do not get on.  Yay for long-term relationships and vasectomies. And yeah, also, self-control and I have some Issues.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:41:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221415#post221415</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221415#post221415</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Done properly the effectiveness is in the high ninety percents but it does take both self-control and good communication (not that those are bad things in a relationship). </q></p><p>I wonder what the stats are on people not doing it properly.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:56:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221418#post221418</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221418#post221418</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>   <em>I?ve always wondered if the Love Capsule was less bothersome to circumcised men than to un-. Without getting unduly personal, I?d love to know if that?s the case!</em></p><p>From what I?ve seen it?s more that it presents a different set of difficulties.</q></p><p>Blokes I've known who'd rather not bother than?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:15:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Isabel Hitchings</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221419#post221419</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221419#post221419</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Blokes I?ve known who?d rather not bother than wear one?have been the ones with foreskins. Is it only coincidence? </q></p><p>I don't think I've personally encountered anyone who would rather not bother but I seem to recall those without having more technical difficulties than those with. Obviously we need a larger?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:39:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221420#post221420</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221420#post221420</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><cough></q></p><p>roflnui</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 17:44:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221426#post221426</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221426#post221426</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Because of Reasons</q></p><p>This is my favourite phrase on earth right now.</p><p>Yeah, the Pill can bite me. I maintain that it works by making you never want to have sex again. (Says the person who wrote her MA thesis on its significance. Heh.)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:18:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221429#post221429</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221429#post221429</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Obviously we need a larger sample group</q></p><p>Sounds like a plan! ;-)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:59:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221447#post221447</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221447#post221447</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I maintain that it works by making you never want to have sex again.</q></p><p>That's exactly how I feel about condoms. I'd actually rather have a wank, or more likely, just not bother at all. I feel I can say this now that there's very little chance of me ever?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 08:27:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221462#post221462</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221462#post221462</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Blokes I?ve known who?d rather not bother than wear one?have been the ones with foreskins.  </q><br />That's, er, Lamentable...</p><p><Grabs rubber overcoat...></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:24:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221473#post221473</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221473#post221473</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Lamentable?</q></p><p>So much for unstoppable urges, eh?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:25:46 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Josh Addison</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221495#post221495</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221495#post221495</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Because of Reasons<br />This is my favourite phrase on earth right now.</q></p><p>It is a good phrase, although when I hear it I can only think of <a href="http://threewordphrase.com/pardonme.htm" target="_blank">this</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:27:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221496#post221496</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221496#post221496</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Also, it is possible that my experience is atypical, and people just tell me stuff.</q></p><p>Last night, out drinking with a male friend, I may have unlocked one of the keys to this. It goes something like this:</p><p>Him: And I mean, okay, she's hot...<br />Me: Oh hell yeah. I'd?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:44:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221497#post221497</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221497#post221497</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						You stopped him before the "but"? You missed the whole blokey angle.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:49:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221498#post221498</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221498#post221498</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You stopped him before the "but"?</q></p><p>Heh. Let's all just assume I made the obvious filthy joke, and not embarrass anyone.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:07:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221501#post221501</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221501#post221501</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm tired of being the "but" of your jokes.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:19:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221537#post221537</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221537#post221537</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>The main one that came up was around ?raising children in the Catholic faith?. I was prepared to go so far as to let them be baptized, but not so far as to make them go to church or a Catholic school. My wife had probably not realized just how?</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 09:28:27 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221542#post221542</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221542#post221542</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fitxofd7kOA&amp;feature=related" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fitxofd7kOA&amp;feature=related</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:11:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221543#post221543</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221543#post221543</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>My ex recently found, or re-found or something the Catholic Church, and we're negotating about her attending a Catholic school, which I'm fanatically against.</q></p><p>I was prepared to make it the one and only firm veto power I'd ever use, if it came to that. It didn't, which is great?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:24:18 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221545#post221545</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221545#post221545</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Compromise is always a good solution I find. I was bought up as an Agnostic which required me to go to church every other week.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:39:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Hosking</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221546#post221546</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221546#post221546</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>For those who were brought up Catholic.....the immortal* Dave Allen </p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxo81Ok9Urk" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxo81Ok9Urk</a></p><p>*um, except for the fact he died a couple of years back.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:51:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221551#post221551</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221551#post221551</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						My cousin's children alternated Catholic and Presbyterian churches week by week. They've all ended up the kind of Christians who never go to church &ndash; despite the eldest girl being given an illustrated Hail Mary by her grandmother, as a 5th birthday present.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 13:41:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221552#post221552</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221552#post221552</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>For years my experience of christian doctrine classes would finish with "Outside, Harris!" or "To the Rector's office and wait for me there!"  </p><p>Brilliant clip, thanks.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 13:43:58 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221559#post221559</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221559#post221559</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>an illustrated Hail Mary</q></p><p>A sketch of a rugby pass. Awesome!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 14:14:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221560#post221560</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221560#post221560</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>"Outside, Harris!"</q></p><p>teeshirt</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 14:14:40 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Geoff Lealand</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221562#post221562</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221562#post221562</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I was drummed out of bible class* at an early age (9 or 10) for asking, "But aren't these just metaphors?" about the loaves-and-fishes stories and such I was being told.</p><p>* the only place of social intercourse (with a very faint hope that it might lead to the other?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 14:58:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221566#post221566</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221566#post221566</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Mine were more along the ?questioning the internal logic? lines:</p><p><em> ?If Adam and Eve were the first man and woman, made directly by God, and they had Cain and Abel, and Cain slew Abel, who did Cain marry?? </em></p><p><em>edit</em> gods but my speeling is atrocious today</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 15:33:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221569#post221569</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221569#post221569</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I was drummed out of bible class* at an early age (9 or 10) for asking, ?But aren?t these just metaphors?? about the loaves-and-fishes stories and such I was being told.</q></p><p>I dunno if anyone's run into Kiwi Camp, which is a school-holidays-and-school-camps place north of Wellington, but I really?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 16:06:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221571#post221571</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221571#post221571</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>?If Adam and Eve were the first man and woman, made directly by God, and they had Cain and Abel, and Cain slew Abel, who did Cain marry?? </q></p><p>Actually, I think you'll find that even in Sunday school at least a third son is mentioned, Seth, but Adam had other?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 16:16:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221572#post221572</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221572#post221572</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So Cain either married a sister or a niece (ie one of Seth's daughters).</q></p><p>That was pretty much my point in asking the priests the question, but they would always sling me out before I got to "So, the human race is based on incest, then?"</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 16:30:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221573#post221573</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221573#post221573</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That was pretty much my point in asking the priests the question, but they would always sling me out before I got to ?So, the human race is based on incest, then??</q></p><p>Oooh, oooh, I know this one: incest was totes OK back then, because Adam and Eve were created?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 16:40:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221577#post221577</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221577#post221577</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Lilith? The OT Lilith? Where's she in all this?</p><p>(The Presbytarian bible school that my mother sent two of us to (after my father died) politely asked her to remove us because 'they're questioning the teacher. All the time.' I suppose a couple of kids, 10 &amp; 11, who'd had their?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:00:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221578#post221578</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221578#post221578</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> but they would always sling me out before I got to ?So, the human race is based on incest, then??</q></p><p>Well, of course it is. And probably survived at various times in human history via various degrees of inbreeding. I fail to see the problem there.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:01:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221581#post221581</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221581#post221581</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Such almost certainly concentrated survival traits &ndash; some of 'em quite nasty...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:07:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221582#post221582</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221582#post221582</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>*Yes, I did become aware of apologetic exogesis later. Still unconvincing.</q></p><p>I think it's a wonderfully poetic image, me. And the first time I was told that it was supposedly a mistranslation for getting a tow-rope through the eye of a needle, or that (worse) the eye of a needle?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:10:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221584#post221584</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221584#post221584</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Excellent to learn!<br />Us poetic literalists can still appreciate etc. etc. &ndash; but not when the thing was illustrated ( and badly.)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:20:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lucy Stewart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221585#post221585</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221585#post221585</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Lilith? The OT Lilith? Where?s she in all this?</q></p><p>I?ve mostly absorbed Bible apologetics of the Independent Baptist variety. They don?t hold with all that apocryphal stuff. It?s practically pagan.</p><p><q>But then apparently that?s not the case ? Jesus really said camel through the eye of a needle, updating an?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:21:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>giovanni tiso</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221586#post221586</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221586#post221586</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I seem to recall hearing ? and am fully prepared to be corrected on this ? that pretty much all the neat aphorisms attributed to Jesus in the Bible are just updated versions of previously-existing pieces of wisdom.</q></p><p>An anti-Christian polemic by Piergiorgio Odifreddi I read is full of examples?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:24:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221588#post221588</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221588#post221588</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Quoting from the past = excellent acknowledgement of ancestral storytelling/evidence. Even if done by later scribes...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:27:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Barnes</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221591#post221591</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221591#post221591</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ah, the days of arguing with Bible teachers, or whatever they were called back then. I was banned from Sunday school after being told off for arguing with the teacher and coming back with the excuse that "Jesus argued with the priests in the temple so I'm like Jesus"<br />Not?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:34:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221593#post221593</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221593#post221593</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Ah, the days of arguing with Bible teachers, or whatever they were called back then. </q></p><p>Presbys didnt actually like the term 'Sunday school teachers' way back then...</p><p>There seems to be a few  of us who can say 'Kicked Out Of Indoctrination Course" eh? Pity it's not a good acronym...?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:41:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221599#post221599</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221599#post221599</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>turn tablist...</strong><br /><q>?Jesus argued with the priests in the temple so I?m like Jesus? Not a popular boy was I.</q><br />How'd ya go with those moneylenders, then?</p><p><br /><strong>get it off yer chest...</strong><br /><q>If Adam and Eve were the first man and woman, made directly by God</q><br />I thought that was?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 19:22:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221600#post221600</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221600#post221600</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I was prepared to make it the one and only firm veto power I'd ever use, if it came to that. It didn't, which is great because ultimatums suck arse.</q></p><p>Yeah, well I vetoed, and we're currently about two or three weeks away from a judge deciding for us. Which?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 19:41:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>bmk</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221601#post221601</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221601#post221601</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>My daughter keeps piping up from her car seat with things she?s been taught about god. Today she told me she loved god more than everyone because god was everywhere and everything. I wish it was illegal to indoctrinate kids like that :(</q></p><p>Man that sucks so much.. I had?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 19:47:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DeepRed</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221603#post221603</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221603#post221603</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Doesn't that bring to mind the Parsons kids from <em>1984</em>?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 20:03:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221606#post221606</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221606#post221606</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Lilith? The OT Lilith? Where?s she in all this?</q></p><p>I think Lilith is only mentioned in one of the Apocrypha, as Adam's first wife, made from the earth along with him.  As I recall, he divorced her for being too uppity, and replaced her with Eve, who was subservient by?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 20:43:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221607#post221607</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221607#post221607</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>I know what you did last Sumer...</strong>*<br /><q>Her obvious connection with sexuality and fertility is no doubt what makes her demonic in Hebrew mythology.</q><br />Well, that <em>and</em> the killing of neonates (newborn children) used to annoy them as well...</p><p><strong>A mantle piece...</strong><br />I guess the being made from earth thang?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 21:21:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221609#post221609</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221609#post221609</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Ian can I just say?I don?t know what you have for breakfast, but I?m pretty sure you could patent it! ;-)  [Lithosphere, indeed!]</p><p>Regarding the transition from Mesopotamian goddess to Hebrew demon: it?s amazing how old stories and images never seem to get thrown away, just reused for new purposes.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 21:39:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jeremy Andrew</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221612#post221612</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221612#post221612</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I wish it was illegal to indoctrinate kids like that :(</q></p><p>As I saw quoted on the intenets somewhere recently: </p><p>Religion is like a penis:<br />Its ok to have one,<br />Its ok to be proud of it,<br />But don't bring it out in public, <br />And don't try and shove it?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 22:08:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221614#post221614</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221614#post221614</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						We're not actually sure whether Ian's posts are due to the drugs he takes, or the drugs he should have taken...
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 22:35:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221615#post221615</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221615#post221615</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Awesome!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 22:36:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jeremy Andrew</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221617#post221617</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221617#post221617</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Of course now I feel deprived that my parents didn't cave into my grandparents and send me off to Sunday school, so I could get kicked out like all the cool kids :-)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 23:15:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>nzlemming</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221618#post221618</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221618#post221618</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Oh wow! I finally made it to 'cool kid' status. All my life I've waited for this *sniff*</p><p>I'd like to thank the Academy, and my teachers, and my parents and the guy that does the lighting...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 23:29:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ian Dalziel</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221622#post221622</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221622#post221622</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><strong>Lithium?</strong><br /><q>due to the drugs he takes, or the drugs he should have taken?</q><br />Chance would be a fine thing, and what with the Selenium deficiency in Canterbury my natural lunacy is kept in check &ndash; well I might neck the odd Rheineck (or what's on special) &ndash; but in?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 08:24:07 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221627#post221627</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221627#post221627</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Amy Winehouse?s death</q></p><p>What a waste.  So much talent.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:42:09 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221628#post221628</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221628#post221628</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Of course now I feel deprived that my parents didn't cave into my grandparents and send me off to Sunday school, so I could get kicked out like all the cool kids :-)</q></p><p>Ya, my writing career is severely hampered by not having suffered enough as a child. With an?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:48:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Isabel Hitchings</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221650#post221650</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221650#post221650</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						When, at the tender age of nine, I lost my faith and quit Sunday school (I went with a friend with, I suspect, the main purpose of giving my atheist parents a couple of hours off) they begged me to come back and be in the Christmas play.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 17:14:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Lilith __</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221666#post221666</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221666#post221666</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Not sure if this counts as a <em>deus ex machina</em> , or just magical thinking, but <a href="http://make-everything-ok.com/" target="_blank">this little button</a> might make us all feel better.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 22:49:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Butler</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221688#post221688</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221688#post221688</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Anglican (which seems to be the kind of Christianity where you don?t even have to believe in God)</q></p><p>I was still a good Anglican long after I ceased believing, which is probably one reason it took me so long to notice that it had happened. The choir I'm in sings?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:33:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Martin Lindberg</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221738#post221738</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221738#post221738</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Nice story in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/25/nyregion/after-long-wait-same-sex-couples-marry-in-new-york.html?hp" target="_blank">New York Times</a> about the first round of same-sex weddings over the weekend. </p><p>ETA: Money quote:</p><p><q>Many of the newly married had already sought every legal protection and held any symbolic ceremony available to same-sex couples. But it was never sufficient, they said. They wanted to?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:37:03 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Emma Hart</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221739#post221739</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221739#post221739</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Nice story in the New York Times about the first round of same-sex weddings over the weekend.</q></p><p>Srsly, same-sex wedding photos always make me cry, and I make no apology for that. For me, this is putting meaning and significance back into marriage.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:46:49 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Isabel Hitchings</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221742#post221742</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221742#post221742</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Srsly, same-sex wedding photos always make me cry, and I make no apology for that.</q></p><p>The attached video was a complete sniffle-fest. I am especially touched by the older couples who have waited decades for this.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:57:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Danielle</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221744#post221744</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221744#post221744</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>same-sex wedding photos always make me cry</q></p><p>I started bawling at the photo at the *top of the page*. That's speedy even for me.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:03:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Greville Whittle</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221784#post221784</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221784#post221784</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The attached video was a complete sniffle-fest. I am especially touched by the older couples who have waited decades for this.</q></p><p>I agree totally, the impression I got from the article was of older people and long term couples that had just been waaaaiiting for so fucking long to get?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:11:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221785#post221785</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221785#post221785</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>The attached video was a complete sniffle-fest. I am especially touched by the older couples who have waited decades for this.</q></p><p>Quite &ndash; I keep saying to people who ask "why the hell do you care so much about marriage equality" that they should do the numbers.  I'm turning forty?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 06:19:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Megan Wegan</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221789#post221789</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=221789#post221789</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I started bawling at the photo at the *top of the page*. That?s speedy even for me.</q></p><p>I haven't been able to bring myself to look at the photos yet. I just _know_ I am going to cry. </p><p>One thing that apparently never occurred to me in this whole "becoming?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:43:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Greville Whittle</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=222054#post222054</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=222054#post222054</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>One thing that apparently never occurred to me in this whole ?becoming a celebrant bizzo, is that I?ve cried at ever wedding I have ever been to. Problematic.</q></p><p>Only if we redefine problematic to mean awesomesauce. I doubt you'd start crying until after the vows, and to have a celebrant?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:27:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=222063#post222063</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=222063#post222063</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Liked the wee button &ndash; agnostic as to its effect!
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:06:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jackie Clark</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=222071#post222071</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=222071#post222071</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The photos that really affected me were the ones of the older people who had obviously waited such a long time for that moment. Magic.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:19:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Hebe</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=222341#post222341</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/up-front-how-about-now/?p=222341#post222341</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Being raised a Roman Catholic (definitely capitalised), and having a racy priest who drove a Citroen Pallas in a tiny South Island village, we went to Sunday school on Friday nights.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:10:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
