Posts by John Farrell
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
Now what we need, to tie this all together nicely, is to hear that David Bain was at the party on the night of the chicken.
-
I didn't see much "benefit of the doubt" extended to Howard Broad by Wishart, or by most of the infestors of rightwing blogs, Craig. Perhaps we snould say, as they do "If Idour doesn't sue. it must be true"?
-
And your reaction to Ian using the man who played the film as a source for his story, dad4justice?
-
Naming sources is hardly providing facts, even if they have made sworn statements. Where are the documents providing corroboration? Where are the statements from other witnesses backing up the original source?
-
If Ian wants to be believed, David, he needs to start providing evidence, rather than publishing allegations, and assuming they're true. It's really quite surprising how few of your commenters understand the difference between allegation and fact.
-
He already has, Simon. It's called "Investigate Magazine".
-
You mean, the investigation you have, when you're not having one?
-
Perhaps Ian should be asked to produce corroborating evidence, Angus, before any more time is spent on this?
-
I thought he sounded like someone in an uncomfortable spot, trying to tell the truth.
-
What I find interesting is that claims made by Wishart and his informants are treated as gospel truth, and denials or explanations by their targets are derided as lies or spin. You would hope never to face a jury staffed by Farrar's commenters.