Posts by Alex Coleman

Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First

  • Hard News: Haphazardly to war,

    The decision is about symbollism, and symbollism matters. This decision affects how we are seen in the world more than it affects the outcome in Iraq/Syria. But the NZ PM can’t just come out and say “Our troops won’t make any difference but we’re going to send them anyway”, so he plays the diplomatic game.

    I agree that symbolism matters, but symbols are tricky things. What is it that we are symbolising? If we are symbolising our commitment to various things that the actual effort doesn’t live up to, then it is a hollow symbol. If we say, ‘this probably won’t work, but at least we tried’, that only really says something good about us if we try our hardest. If we only, (as a global community), try a little bit; enough to say 'we did something' then that’s an awful symbol.

    Deploying troops to make a point about ourselves as a nation, irrespective of the realities of war on the ground, is a pretty grim symbol when we consider how things may well play out for the residents of Mosul.

    It would also mean that any casualties we take, or inflict, would be in aid of our image abroad, rather than anything else. The actual war has to be the important thing, in my view, not the unrelated geopolitics of ‘our place in the word’.

    Wellington • Since Nov 2006 • 247 posts Report Reply

  • Hard News: Public Address Word of the…,

    Ackshully: While sounding similar to 'actually', it means 'alternatively'.

    Wellington • Since Nov 2006 • 247 posts Report Reply

  • Hard News: Some reprehensible bullshit, in reply to simon g,

    Also, from the HoS's own reporting:

    "All decisions relating to what facilities were included as part of the move were made by Auckland Council, not the mayoral office, and all costs were part of that Auckland Council budget.

    Wellington • Since Nov 2006 • 247 posts Report Reply

  • Hard News: The humanity,

    "Anonymous briefings to the press and other attempts at destabilisation are not at all helpful"

    Well no, they are actively and purposefully damaging to the party. They are 'not at all helpful' as a deliberate strategy. But Cunliffe made them do it, by being popular with the membership and the unions, the bastard.

    Wellington • Since Nov 2006 • 247 posts Report Reply

  • Hard News: The humanity,

    There's a side of this story that isn't really getting any attention. Yes, Cunliffe bears the repsonsibility he bears. But the LP is a party and it's not acting like one.

    Cunliffe doesn;t make his caucus opponents do what they do. he isn't responsible for them talking to Watkins off the record etc.

    Everyone knows that he isn't popular with many of his play mates. but it's not a glee club, it's a political party. Not all the 'refreshed' Nat mps were happy with how they were treated. Did we hear a peep? No, we did not.

    Look at this from last early in the year:

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11209053

    'And they're a bit unhappy so they've reformed again and are just having a bit of a chat about how poorly performing Mr Cunliffe has been this year. They're not going to roll him. They're just concerned he's not delivering on his promises. I'm told that there's a bit of a go slow. Some of the MPs and the staff have decided well he can lose the election and we'll roll him straight after the election.
    A go slow, that's what I'm told, they won't roll him but they're not working hard for him'.

    Pretty short odds on that anon commenter being the same anon commenter who told Watkins that Cunliffe gave up a few weeks ago and was just positioning for the leadership squabble.

    Not having the friendship of your caucus is a problem. having a caucus that won;t accept the expressed will of the party though, is a much bigger problem. I don't know how Cunliffe is supposed to fix that.

    Wellington • Since Nov 2006 • 247 posts Report Reply

  • Hard News: Why we thought what we thought, in reply to Joe Wylie,

    That's amazing Joe. Love the discussion that follows on from it regarding pedantry and tense too.

    Wellington • Since Nov 2006 • 247 posts Report Reply

  • Hard News: Dirty Politics, in reply to Dismal Soyanz,

    Also worth bearing in mind that Odgers and her employers parted ways 'by mutual agreement' earlier this week.

    Possibly unrelated. Everything is possible.

    Wellington • Since Nov 2006 • 247 posts Report Reply

  • Hard News: Didn't see that coming, in reply to Matthew Hooton,

    hacking into Helmut Kohl’s IT

    What does that mean?

    Wellington • Since Nov 2006 • 247 posts Report Reply

  • Hard News: Didn't see that coming, in reply to Russell Brown,

    Well, she said some coasters can be a bit feral, which still wasn't her finest moment, but the 'inbred' part seems to be a right wing blog based fabrication.

    Wellington • Since Nov 2006 • 247 posts Report Reply

  • Hard News: In The Green Room,

    Brilliant.

    I like to hear their position on torture, and what NZ can or should do regarding the US's complete failure to abide by the treaties we are both signatories to.

    Wellington • Since Nov 2006 • 247 posts Report Reply

Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 25 Older→ First