George is a good name. But it does do a disservice to Georges, two of whom I know and neither of whom seem to be remotely approaching a disaster or crisis.
What about 'W'. We could even pronounce it Dubya. It could stand for Woe. Or Worrisome. Or Wringer. Or, to quote 11 year old daughter, Whatever.
James: originally I was more referring to a metaphorical winter of the political soul
It's okay, I knew that, Paul. I was just trying one of those segue things. (Waits for applause. Not a sausage.)
I spotted the word 'denier' and immediately (sadly) thought of stockings. I've just looked it up. A denier is a unit of weight for silk equal to 1.18 grammes. So that makes a climate change denier's argument lightweight?
Sorry, I'm bored.
remember I predicted 3 years of winter ..... (mind you it's a lovely sunny day to day, I can see right out to the horizon .... but it feels like winter)
Paul, you will be reassured to know that in the dark days of winter there is no point in insulating your house to keep warm. There's an opinion piece in today's Dom Post (I can't find it online, alas) that asserts that health records fail to show any substantive health benefits from insulating houses. He also calls global warming a "contentious theory" which gives you a bit of a clue.
Who the heck planted this story given that the guy is from an American-based think-tank I can only guess. But we're obviously being warmed up (no pun intended) for Nick Smith or whoever to can the free insulation scheme.
God, but I love the objectivity of our newspapers.
It particularly concerns me when there is so little attention being paid to the policies of National's first-cab-off-the-rank for coalition talks, Act.
Sample of one. I tend to do the "head in the sand" thing with Act's policies because I just cannot conceive of them ever being implemented. The memories of Roger Douglas et al are too fresh; there'd be rioting in the streets (metaphorically if not actually) if we went down this path again.
It's a good point, Julie.
Rodney's going to be bargaining no less than the Maori Party. He'll have a bottom line and we only have John Key's word that he wouldn't have Roger in his Cabinet. In not interrogating Act's policies we seem to be happy to accept Mr Key's word.
Which raises a certain dissonance.
Or some one who has gone toe for toe with the real bad guys
Okay, I'll fall for it. Who are the real bad guys?
Chuck, what I enjoy about PA is that it's refreshingly free of snideness and innuendo.
And then you popped up.
I'm personally quite relieved that these are, actually, hopeless compared with what Ansell did last time
John Ansell's not doing these. Does anybody know who is? I'm curious.
Look at my background.
Said John, the man from Merrill’s
We shall sell. Trust me.
James - Marcy from Married With Children...?
Ah! Gap in education due to not having television in those days.
heh. took me two days to work this out.
G'arn, gi'us a clue.
It's eluding me.