<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Cracker: RIght On.</title>
		<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Public Address</copyright>
			
			
			

			
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210888#post210888</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210888#post210888</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:04:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210889#post210889</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210889#post210889</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Same the real problem hasn't changed: ACT is neither libertarian fish nor populist right-wing foul, and it's tendency to foul its linen in public isn't clearing things up .for anyone.  Bugger.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:04:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>linger</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210891#post210891</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210891#post210891</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						(The common word to both those descriptions being the most accurate one: <em>foul</em>.)
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:15:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Michie</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210892#post210892</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210892#post210892</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						If I'm remembering right, ACT began with a message that a libertarian approach should be popular across left and right wings but found it could not sell that to the left and reverted to the right, finding there a discussion of policy was insufficient so turned to more typical popularist?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:17:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael Savidge</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210893#post210893</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210893#post210893</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Seems to me that this suits National very well going into an election. They're flying in the polls, are likely to be in a strong position to either govern alone or with Dunne/Act support. Thereafter they have the numbers to swing right and really get their agenda going. </p><p>In fact,?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:22:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210894#post210894</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210894#post210894</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Watching this go down (Brash and then Banks? not even members yet ) it seems to me that this is just a scheme on the part of the Nats to sop up what would be the wasted right wing votes if Act didn't make the MMP threshold &ndash; kind of?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:23:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Damian Christie</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210895#post210895</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210895#post210895</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						@Tim &ndash; With respect (and I'm prepared to be wrong) I'm not sure if you do remember rightly, I think ACT has always had this dilemma. I don't think Douglas is exactly a dyed in the wool libertarian. The focus has always been far more about economic liberalism (Unfinished Business),?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:24:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Damian Christie</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210896#post210896</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210896#post210896</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						@Paul &ndash; I think Act would always win Epsom though wouldn't they? So the votes would never be wasted.  I think Brash is genuinely disaffected with National, rolled by the populist vaguely centrist Key.. they might work together, but I don't think it's a plan by the Nats.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:25:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Nightwyrm</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210898#post210898</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210898#post210898</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It's interesting that the ACT Party have seemingly tainted their reputation further with publicly denying any knowledge about discussions or agreements, while holding backroom chats with Brash. Will they lose (more) public trust from this?</p><p>There's also been some interesting chats at my work on whether there'll be grounds for?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:31:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210901#post210901</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210901#post210901</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>@Tim ? With respect (and I?m prepared to be wrong) I?m not sure if you do remember rightly, I think ACT has always had this dilemma. I don?t think Douglas is exactly a dyed in the wool libertarian. The focus has always been far more about economic liberalism (Unfinished Business),?</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:41:24 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew E</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210902#post210902</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210902#post210902</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q><a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1104/S00515/keybrash-extreme-team-will-hurt-mainstream-new-zealand.htm" target="_blank">?Labour will fight tooth and nail against the agenda of Don Brash and John Key"</a></q></p><p>Well, so far their fighting has been pretty toothless.  Hopefully the nails will prove somewhat more effective.</p><p>Sadly though, a tag line for a certain beverage springs to mind.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:51:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210903#post210903</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210903#post210903</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> and it's tendency to foul its linen in public isn't clearing things up .for anyone. Bugger.</q></p><p>Not likely to change under Brash either, who left under the cloud of scandal too.</p><p><q>I think Act would always win Epsom though wouldn't they? </q></p><p>I don't think it's certain at all. A lot?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:53:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Withers</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210904#post210904</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210904#post210904</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I've always wondered why anyone would vote for ACT. I'm still wondering.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:53:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mikaere Curtis</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210905#post210905</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210905#post210905</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Given the fractious nature of the caucus (and party in general) coupled with the relative austerity of the resources available to a minor party, I will be very interested to see how well Brash does at developing and delivering a coherent policy message.  Beyond, of course, his rancid "Iwi vs?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:55:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Damian Christie</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210906#post210906</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210906#post210906</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						@Ben &ndash; a lot of National voters don't like Act, but they are also demonstrably smarter than the Epsom Labour voters when it comes to voting tactically.  National had already said they weren't going to stand anyone strong in Epsom, so while it's academic now, I still think it was?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:56:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Damian Christie</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210907#post210907</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210907#post210907</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I just realised that I should've called this post "Dr Brash and Mr Hide". DAMMIT
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:58:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Hannah</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210910#post210910</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210910#post210910</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I don?t know why they didn?t do it last time. ACT could have been history if only a few thousand Labour voters in Epsom could look past traditional tribal enmity to the big MMP picture.</q></p><p>If only all 5,112 Epsom voters who voted for Kate Sutton in 2008 had instead?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:04:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DeepRed</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210911#post210911</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210911#post210911</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Same the real problem hasn't changed: ACT is neither libertarian fish nor populist right-wing foul, and it's tendency to foul its linen in public isn't clearing things up .for anyone. Bugger.</q></p><p>Or to put it succinctly, Tea Party, with a dash of Consumers &amp; Taxpayers Association. No, make that Consumers United?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:04:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210912#post210912</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210912#post210912</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Indeed ? the internal contradictions have been there right from the very beginning. </q></p><p>There's also similar contradictions in the Greens &mdash; but they at least have some discipline and civility at the organisational and caucus levels.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:05:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210913#post210913</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210913#post210913</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Well, so far their fighting has been pretty toothless. Hopefully the nails will prove somewhat more effective.</q></p><p>Honestly, I think Labour has to do a lot better than "lookit, SEEKRITAGENDA" &ndash; again.  Really, I think people have gotten sick of waiting for John Key to reveal he's actually Ruth Richardson?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:08:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew E</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210916#post210916</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210916#post210916</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Agreed.  Especially as large numbers of people appear (for reasons which I have yet to divine) to have no objection to doing the Time Warp again.</p><p>Perhaps Labour could focus on the line that says, <em>"It's a jump to the left"</em></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:15:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tim Michie</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210919#post210919</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210919#post210919</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Damian, Russell: I agree.  Liberalism as opposed to libertarism far better ACT's initial annpnced positions with many writing their own message into what then then loggy group was telling them.  On becoming a policital party &ndash; which always seemed the obvious conclusion to me looking from the outside &ndash; selling?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:34:10 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>andin</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210922#post210922</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210922#post210922</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Time for a young vibrant party of the right...</p></blockquote><p>hmm?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:07:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210923#post210923</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210923#post210923</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>make that Consumers United Not Taxpayers</q></p><p>I'm glad *someone* picked up on that one :)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:12:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210924#post210924</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210924#post210924</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Not likely to change under Brash either, who left under the cloud of scandal</q></p><p>Lest we forget the dodgy dealings of Brash, Key, Joyce and their brethren, NZ On Screen has posted the full length <a href="http://www.nzonscreen.com/title/the-hollow-men-2008" target="_blank">Hollow Men</a> for all to view (embedded, 149MB for first clip of 5).</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:14:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andre Alessi</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210925#post210925</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210925#post210925</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>ACT is neither libertarian fish nor populist right-wing foul,</q></p><p>It's tuna, the "chicken of the sea":</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2h72aXVP8o" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2h72aXVP8o</a></p><p>Just imagine Don Brash with Jessica Simpson's body.  Go on, I dare you.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:21:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Matthew Poole</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210926#post210926</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210926#post210926</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>ACT could have been history if only a few thousand Labour voters in Epsom could look past traditional tribal enmity to the big MMP picture.</q></p><p>In 2005, yes, since Hide's majority was very much smaller than the Labour/Green candidates' votes total.<br />In 2008, not a chance. Rodney's majority in 2008?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:22:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bevan Shortridge</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210927#post210927</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210927#post210927</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Hide has resigned as leader. <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10722058" target="_blank"> Brash coup positive for ACT, for NZ</a>. Apparently.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:25:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andre Alessi</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210930#post210930</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210930#post210930</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> Hopefully the nails will prove somewhat more effective.</q></p><p>It's notoriously difficult to hammer that last nail in when you're pinning yourself to a cross, but I have faith that Phil Goff will manage it with his usual grace.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:33:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew C</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210931#post210931</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210931#post210931</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<q>This time around, same thing. Good publicity, you could argue, having your new leader declaring his intentions on every media outlet available ? even ?Perigo? FFS. But from the outside it makes the fringe right look fractured, compromised, messy. We?ve seen the uncertainty, the machinations ? will it be John?</q>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:47:48 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Bart Janssen</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210932#post210932</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210932#post210932</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I've always wondered why anyone would vote for ACT. I'm still wondering.</q></p><p>I actually know the answer to that because I have a friend (whom I really still do like) who can't abide National for it's soft and spineless approach to economics in NZ. Act is almost right wing enough?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:49:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andre Alessi</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210933#post210933</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210933#post210933</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I actually know the answer to that because I have a friend (whom I really still do like) who can?t abide National for it?s soft and spineless approach to economics in NZ. Act is almost right wing enough in their economic position to satisfy him.</q></p><p>A guy I went to?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:55:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210934#post210934</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210934#post210934</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Fascinating politics. Brash's <a href="http://www.radionz.co.nz/audio/national/ntn/2011/04/28/leadership_bid_for_the_act_party" target="_blank">nine-to-noon interview</a> helps to make sense of this, but not a lot. </p><p>Will be interesting to see how Key handles this to avoid bleeding votes to ACT without increasing total support for the centre-right. I still think Brash has low-value electability. His legendary "not mainstream NZers" pissed?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:02:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>HORansome</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210935#post210935</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210935#post210935</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Anyone reading Kiwiblog on this? You should; <a href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2011/04/hide_resigns.html#comment-824501" target="_blank">John Ansell's breathtaking optimism that Brash will be PM after the next election</a> is, well, gloriously mad, and it just gets better with every comment he makes.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:07:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BlairMacca</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210936#post210936</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210936#post210936</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Will be interesting to see how Key handles this to avoid bleeding votes to ACT without increasing total support for the centre-right. I still think Brash has low-value electability. His legendary ?not mainstream NZers? pissed a lot of people off across the spectrum.</q></p><p>I wouldn't be too sure,  Brash did?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:07:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich of Observationz</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210937#post210937</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210937#post210937</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Damien, you probably know more about Auckland than I do, but I don't fully buy that Epsom is safe for whoever NACT decide to endorse.</p><p>There are going to be some Epsom voters who were happy with the Hide populist agenda and are going to be less happy with Brash.?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:13:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210939#post210939</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210939#post210939</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I read it to; couldn't resist asking if that'd be pre-election or not. Ansell's a little mad in that I've-seen-the-future-but-you'll-not-understand-it kind of way.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:17:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210940#post210940</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210940#post210940</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Blair, there is a risk that National will move closer to the centre to try to capture more votes. I?m of the view that National had to do this to win last time. But look at the commentary from the likes of Ansell over at kiwiblog, he sees Brash?s coup?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:20:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>recordari</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210944#post210944</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210944#post210944</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>There are going to be some Epsom voters who were happy with the Hide populist agenda and are going to be less happy with Brash. </q><br />Isn't it <a href="http://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/newsdetail1.asp?storyID=195518" target="_blank">Banks for Epsom</a>?</p><p>A Harley Davidson Street Aye Specialist.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 16:37:35 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Raymond A Francis</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210946#post210946</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210946#post210946</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>I am interested in the claim that Brash is a racist<br />His position is that he is not; he just believes everyone is equal which is hardly a racist position. <br />What ever, it sure scared the bejesus out of the Labour government (or maybe the polls did!) who then took?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:13:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>James Butler</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210947#post210947</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210947#post210947</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I am interested in the claim that Brash is a racist</q></p><p>Danyl has a very succinct summary of the argument <a href="http://dimpost.wordpress.com/2011/04/28/why-brash-is-a-racist/" target="_blank">here</a>. PLUS we get to play Race-Based Policy Bingo in the comments!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:23:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Campbell</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210948#post210948</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210948#post210948</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>@Paul &ndash; I think Act would always win Epsom though wouldn't they? </q></p><p><br />Actually my assumption is that Rodney's brand is so tarnished this time around that there's a good chance that they wont &ndash; and as a result the right would lose all of ACT's party votes &ndash; hence the?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:32:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210950#post210950</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210950#post210950</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>. Which scares me. He could tap the racist vote very easily.</q></p><p>Oh, and remind me who?s not ruling out getting back in bed with WInston Peters if that zombie apocalypse happens?  Hint: It?s not Key.  Throw in the visceral hatred a good chunk of Labour has for the Maori?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:39:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>recordari</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210951#post210951</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210951#post210951</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>It is certainly proving to be a valuable means of driving traffic to your site, using whatever populist bingo cards you choose.</p><p>Meh!</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:53:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Clint Fern</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210952#post210952</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210952#post210952</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>His position is that he is not;</q></p><p>The same position taken by Pauline Hanson and Nick Griffin.</p><p>While Brash is plainly not as extreme as those two, is as just as convincing in the "I'm not a racist but..." stakes.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:59:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210953#post210953</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210953#post210953</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>His position is that he is not; he just believes everyone is equal which is hardly a racist position</q></p><p>And ignores all the data which shows they're not. Not in terms of health, education, employment etc. So now what? Any number of indicators shows a significant proportion of the nation's?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:02:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>jb</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210954#post210954</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210954#post210954</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Or simply change the name from ACT to APO, the German acronym for Extraparliamentary Opposition. <br />Which is exactly is what's going to happen</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:24:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210955#post210955</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210955#post210955</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Will flat tax, welfare cuts and asset sales fix that?</q></p><p>No, and neither will screaming ?racist? at anyone who suggests that the Maori seat may just have outlived their usefulness.  You know, like we somehow managed to get past the idea that only property owners over the age of twenty-one?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:28:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210956#post210956</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210956#post210956</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Not scream Craig but pointing out that there's more than a hint of racism in Brash's public statements over a number of years.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:47:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210959#post210959</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210959#post210959</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Anyone else here thinks the Maori seats may have outlived their usefulness?</p><p>I personally do not so think: the system has changed (and bad cess to Labour for indirectly making this happen) <em>but</em> the southern Maori voice needs to be heard in our Parliament...</p><p>(it is inclusive of Moriori/Rekohu people?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:00:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mikaere Curtis</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210960#post210960</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210960#post210960</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Anyone else here thinks the Maori seats may have outlived their usefulness?</p></blockquote><p>Craig has a mortgage on that.  Given that all Maori have the choice of dis-establishing the Maori seats by voluntarily transferring to the general roll, can't we let the market sort this out ?  Instead, Craig, Brash and?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:15:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Islander</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210961#post210961</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210961#post210961</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>In my whanau, we have steadily moved over onto the Tai Toka roll over the last 30 years: we now find that the younger generations, after learning histories (especially family histories) and thinking about things, prefer to enrol as Maori.<br />So: "the market" is &ndash; sort of- sorting things out...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:34:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rich Lock</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210963#post210963</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210963#post210963</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Just imagine Don Brash with Jessica Simpson's body. Go on, I dare you</q></p><p><br /><a href="http://www.imperatorfish.com/2011/04/imagining-if-two-big-news-stories-of.html" target="_blank">And just in case you need some help with that...</a></p><p>I haven't had the shakes so bad since <a href="http://www.daemonsmovies.com/2011/03/04/meryl-streep-as-margaret-thatcher-in-the-iron-lady-first-photo/<br />">Meryl Streep agreed to play Margaret Thatcher.</a></p><p>The horror.....the horror...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:44:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210966#post210966</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210966#post210966</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Given that all Maori have the choice of dis-establishing the Maori seats by voluntarily transferring to the general roll, can't we let the market sort this out ? </q></p><p>Great argument</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:55:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DeepRed</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210967#post210967</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210967#post210967</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think Brash isn't so much racist as he is rankist-classist. He's always been a libertarian at heart, so the Orewa Speech seemed to owe more to cynical vote-grabbing than actual racial views. Whereas Pauline Hanson, Nick Griffin and Jean-Marie Le Pen have always played open hands in their racial?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:55:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210968#post210968</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210968#post210968</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Goodness, what's that noise? Presumably the centre-right falling into the gender gap that might've just reopened, considering what happened in 2005...</p><p>Craig Y</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:02:15 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Steve Parks</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210969#post210969</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210969#post210969</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Just imagine Don Brash with Jessica Simpson's body. </q></p><p>Yeah, like, where would he hide it?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:03:56 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210971#post210971</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210971#post210971</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Bravo, sir. Shot.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:06:26 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Graeme Edgeler</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210973#post210973</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210973#post210973</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If you believe this, then can you please explain why Brash was happy for only Maori owners of title of the F&amp;S should be treated differently from existing owners ? </q></p><p>The Don Brash National Party opposed the Foreshore and Seabed Act =)</p><p>Also, Maori and non-Maori owners of fee simple title?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:10:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>B Jones</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210975#post210975</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210975#post210975</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						There's overt racism, which is quite rare these days in polite company, and then there's the sort of racism that you have to infer because the only way someone would make a particular statement or argument or advocate a particular policy is if they held basic unspoken negative beliefs about?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:34:44 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>B Jones</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210976#post210976</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210976#post210976</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Graeme, that reminds me of the argument of one of the judges in the Quilter case &ndash; gays aren't discriminated against, they can still get married, just not to someone of the same sex.  Theoretically fair, but when applied to the real world, less so.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:36:33 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210977#post210977</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210977#post210977</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I am assuming that National will want to keep ACT in play as a colation partner and will not attempt to take over its supporters as it tried to when Brash was leader.</q></p><p>The impact upon the overall right vote and where national positions itself is the interesting thing out?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:39:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alex Coleman</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210978#post210978</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210978#post210978</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>If Act positions itself as a more philosophically right-wing liberal party ? economic and <strong>socially</strong>,</q></p><p>Given the John Banks angle, I'm not convinced that's the plan.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:56:50 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210980#post210980</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210980#post210980</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Instead, Craig, Brash and others would rather get out the Stick of Paternal Coercion and remove them without some much as a ?by your leave?. Why convince when you can override ?</q></p><p>Oh, go away and stop drama queening.  You know that the Maori seats can only be abolished by?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:25:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alex Coleman</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210981#post210981</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210981#post210981</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> You know that the Maori seats can only be abolished by Act of Parliament, which a pretty substantive ?by your leave?. </q></p><p><br />So if Brash had won in 05 and abolished the seats, how would have that been with Maori leave? I not only don't recall him saying he was planning?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:44:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andre Alessi</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210982#post210982</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210982#post210982</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Brash is a racist of the willfully ignorant variety.  He may be affable and soft-spoken, but any sixty-five-year old man who uses phrases like "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_brash#Maori_identity" target="_blank">full Maori</a>" when discussing Maori identity, or who uses the "Treaty grievance industry" dog whistle, is not going to have attempted to educate himself over the?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:13:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210983#post210983</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210983#post210983</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Given the John Banks angle, I?m not convinced that?s the plan.</q></p><p>Yes possibly. But probably not going the other way. For such a small party, it's really had to build a pretty big tent to fit all it's arms in.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:32:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210984#post210984</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210984#post210984</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>So if Brash had won in 05 and abolished the seats, how would have that been with Maori leave? </q></p><p>First, Brash couldn?t have abolished a damn thing without the assent of a majority of Parliament. I might not have liked everything the Fifth Labour Government did ? certainly never voted?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:33:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alex Coleman</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210985#post210985</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210985#post210985</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>For such a small party, it?s really had to build a pretty big tent to fit all it?s arms in.</q></p><p>Ha!</p><p>So now that Key has ruled out Brash of finance, and said it's 'highly unlikely' he'll get a top job, <em>and</em> said that ACT has extremist views...</p><p>...I do?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:45:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jeremy Eade</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210986#post210986</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210986#post210986</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						My first post on this site was about Epsom.And I stand by it, Epsom is (on majority) an electorate that needs a heart.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:50:47 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210987#post210987</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210987#post210987</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>now that Key has ruled out Brash of finance, and said it's 'highly unlikely' he'll get a top job</q></p><p>I'd take that with a sack of salt. All depends on how much of the vote they get &ndash; and what the shady backers of both parties tell their boy Key?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:51:11 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alex Coleman</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210988#post210988</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210988#post210988</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sorry if I was unclear Craig. I certainly never meant to imply that Maori were of a hive mind. </p><p>So are you saying that if he had of won a parliamentary majority then that would mean he had the assent of Maori to abolish the seats? Or that such an?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:54:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210990#post210990</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210990#post210990</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>?I do think it?s only fair that the country knows what sort of position an extremist would be likely to hold in any future government. </q></p><p>That?s actually a perfectly reasonable question, but I really don?t think it?s one that can be made with much confidence.  Those tiresome elections lay waste?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 23:53:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210991#post210991</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210991#post210991</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I?d take that with a sack of salt. All depends on how much of the vote they get ? and what the shady backers of both parties tell their boy Key to do</q></p><p>Could someone just <em>ask</em> Brash about this?</p><p>It seems such a bloody obvious question. There's even been?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:16:42 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>81stcolumn</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210992#post210992</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210992#post210992</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Dýou think the EB would let him 'fess up ?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:39:01 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DeepRed</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210993#post210993</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210993#post210993</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Again, I still think Brash is more rankist than racist &ndash; even though the two have overlap, they're not one and the same. It does sound very much like a 'half the working class to kill the other half' strategy to me. Worried about opposition to your Friedmanite agenda? Simple.?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 02:29:54 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210994#post210994</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210994#post210994</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>It would also be perfectly appropriate to simply ask Brash what contact he?s had with the party?s key funders, and which ones backed him. Even if he didn?t answer, there?s nothing wrong with asking about something that?s being alluded to by both friend and foe.</q></p><p>Actually, I think there's bundle?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 02:30:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DeepRed</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210995#post210995</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210995#post210995</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>but the only comparable situation that I'm aware of occurred in Qld recently and has been referred to the State's corruption commission on the basis that it may have included offers of post parliamentary offices.</q></p><p>How recent? The Sir Joh era?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 02:53:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Paul Williams</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210996#post210996</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210996#post210996</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>No, a little more recent, 7 April this year in fact. </p><p>Short version: Brisbane's Lord Mayor, Campbell Newman, (equivalent to Len Brown) announced he'd simultaneous contest a parliamentary seat and also the leadership of the Liberal/National parliamentary coalition. There's a suggestion (leak) that the current leader of the Liberal/National Coalition?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 03:15:00 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>recordari</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210997#post210997</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210997#post210997</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>To me, Brash remains the bloke who dissembled on the EBs and lectured Clark about marriage while conducting extra-marital affairs. I am deeply mistrusting.</q></p><p><a href="http://ndhadeliver.natlib.govt.nz/view/action/ieViewer.do?from_proxy=true&amp;dps_pid=IE955574&amp;dps_custom_att_1=tapuhi&amp;dps_dvs=1304016911396~914&amp;dps_pid=IE955574&amp;change_lng=en" target="_blank">This</a> seems apposite.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 06:55:38 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210998#post210998</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210998#post210998</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>To me, Brash remains the bloke who dissembled on the EBs and lectured Clark about marriage while conducting extra-marital affairs. I am deeply mistrusting.</q></p><p>Um, Paul &mdash; do we really need to go there?  It's weird (and blackly comic) enough that we have a party whose presumptive leader isn't even?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:20:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210999#post210999</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=210999#post210999</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>There's even been a reference from the Brash camp to the Epsom polls being bankrolled by a "longstanding admirer of Brash". Well, who?</q></p><p>Quite.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:16:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211000#post211000</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211000#post211000</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>we have a party whose presumptive leader isn't even a member yet</q></p><p>Brash joined up yesterday morning before the media conference. That it was merely a matter of 'procedure' before then shows what really counts and where power lies in that shady cesspit that has lain beneath both National and?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:19:23 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>dc_red</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211001#post211001</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211001#post211001</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I mean, I think there is a place for Maori culture but why is it that we always use a semi-naked male, sometimes quite pale-skinned Maori, leaping around in, you know, mock battle?</q></p><p>That was the Don back invoking the blood quotient on 4 Sept, 2005. Or perhaps he was?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:36:22 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211002#post211002</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211002#post211002</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>That it was merely a matter of ?procedure? before then shows what really counts and where power lies in that shady cesspit that has lain beneath both National and Act for years.</q></p><p>Oh, for God's sake...  Seriously.  Perhaps I've been living in some Fringe-like alternate universe, but Hide's performance --?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:37:55 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211003#post211003</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211003#post211003</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>If we're keeping track of Brash's next set of blatant lies, this one from that <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10722213" target="_blank">Herald story</a> has to be a doozy:</p><p><q>He was expecting to attract financial backers, but "I have none of that lined up".</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:38:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BlairMacca</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211004#post211004</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211004#post211004</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I think Danyl has nailed it here <a href="http://dimpost.wordpress.com/2011/04/28/why-brash-is-a-racist/" target="_blank">http://dimpost.wordpress.com/2011/04/28/why-brash-is-a-racist/</a>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:39:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211005#post211005</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211005#post211005</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Having been one of National's "shadowy backers", do you want to know something?</q></p><p>Unless you have pulled strings at senior level like Boag or injected millions into both parties over the years like Gibbs, Shirtcliffe, Foreman et al then you simply don't count.</p><p><q>your "shadowy backers" (funny how right-wing parties?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:41:12 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211007#post211007</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211007#post211007</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						lol @ <em>shady cesspit</em>. Yeah, I get an impression of a lot of behind the scenes maneuvering. Frankly, I find it very hard to believe that both Brash and Banks could be making such bold moves without even the slightest consultation with National, given that both have been very senior?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:43:13 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211008#post211008</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211008#post211008</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>As but one example, leading Act functionary Brian Nicolle was one of Banks's key staff as Auckland Mayor. </p><p>There has long been a significant overlap of the right of National with Act. It might be interesting to hear more about what this latest move does for the tussle between the?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:47:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211009#post211009</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211009#post211009</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Key has ruled out Brash of finance, and said it's 'highly unlikely' he'll get a top job</p><p><em>I'd take that with a sack of salt.</em> </q></p><p>Totally. All he's saying is that it's highly unlikely he'd <em>need</em> to give him a top job.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:50:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Tom Semmens</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211010#post211010</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211010#post211010</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The country has moved on from the rather grotesque assembly of old men that now form the ACT party, and I think the electoral appeal of the day before yesterday's man Don Brash is being wildly over-estimated. </p><p>Don Brash is seventy. John Banks is sixty five. Roger Douglas is seventy?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:53:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211011#post211011</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211011#post211011</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Frankly, I find it very hard to believe that both Brash and Banks could be making such bold moves without even the slightest consultation with National, given that both have been very senior Nats in their time. </q></p><p>You've got to be extracting the urine. Do you know <em>anyone</em> involved with?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:54:45 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>recordari</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211012#post211012</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211012#post211012</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Until Act suddenly jumps up above the 1% polling it <a href="http://www.roymorgan.com/news/polls/2011/4661/" target="_blank">most recently achieved</a>, could someone remind me why I should care?</p><p>Whatever, it will certainly be a <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/national/politics/4936726/Monty-Python-like-moments-as-parties-dance-around-each-other" target="_blank">merry dance</a>.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:57:25 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211013#post211013</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211013#post211013</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Analysis from Nicky Hager and National party historian and political scientist Barry Gustafson on Radio NZ's Morning Report (<a href="http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/2488135/don-brash-may-be-sitting-around-cabinet-table-by-year%27s-end.asx" target="_blank">streaming</a> 7min, <a href="http://podcast.radionz.co.nz/mnr/mnr-20110429-0810-Don_Brash_may_be_sitting_around_cabinet_table_by_years_end-048.mp3" target="_blank">MP3</a> 2.5MB). </p><p>Gustafson, hardly a screaming leftie, mentions the attempts by moneyed Aucklanders to hijack the party over the years. Hager says we're seeing a re-run, with many of the?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:00:28 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211014#post211014</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211014#post211014</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Don Brash is seventy. John Banks is sixty five. Roger Douglas is seventy five. Paul Holmes is sixty one. I pretty sure John Armstrong and Audrey Young long ago bid farewell to fifty.  </q></p><p>Too right ? carousel for all the stupid smelly old people! Renew! Renew!</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7TY9CXBKHA" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7TY9CXBKHA</a></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:03:57 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211015#post211015</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211015#post211015</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>All he's saying is that it's highly unlikely he'd need to give him a top job.</q></p><p>All he's saying is "trust me, I'm not the same as those guys". Expect similar utterances and carefully-crafted theatre between now and November.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:04:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211016#post211016</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211016#post211016</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>There has long been a significant overlap of the right of National with Act. </q></p><p>Yeah, but it's never been so overt that the guy who came within a hair's breadth of running this country turns out to be so aligned with ACT that he not only wants to lead it,?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:09:51 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211017#post211017</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211017#post211017</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Gustafson, hardly a screaming leftie, mentions the attempts by moneyed Aucklanders to hijack the party over the years. </q></p><p>Sorry, but what the fuck does this have to do with ACT?  I know Barry reasonably well, and I don't think he's quite accepted &mdash; let alone wrapped his head around --?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:16:14 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211018#post211018</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211018#post211018</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>what the fuck does this have to do with ACT?</q></p><p>Same people deep behind both is what I've been saying and you have been resisting hearing it seems. Gustafson didn't appear to be having any struggle with the conversation.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:19:19 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211019#post211019</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211019#post211019</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>it's never been so overt </q></p><p>Lack of any effective opposition can enhance the <em>brashness</em> of politicians.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:21:06 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211020#post211020</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211020#post211020</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Quite interesting, although I think both Hager and Gustafson focus just a little too much on the influence of Brash in the party, without really considering <em>how he came to be the leader of that party</em>. How credible is it that no-one amongst all those career politicians understood what the?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:23:29 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211021#post211021</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211021#post211021</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Same people deep behind both is what I've been saying and you have been resisting hearing it seems.</q></p><p>I've heard it, Sacha.  I'm just not buying what you're selling, and you're not making much of a case to change my mind.</p><p>(Sanctuary, this is where you swoop in &mdash; just?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:27:37 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Alex Coleman</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211046#post211046</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211046#post211046</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Brash and Banks hatched their plans for a comeback about four months ago but the decision to make a run for ACT was not finalised till last month, when Hide offered Brash the co-leadership, which he rejected. </p><p>Brash and Banks confirmed yesterday there had been talks with people within the?</q></p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:17:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211047#post211047</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211047#post211047</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q> I'm just not buying what you're selling</q></p><p>Back to that cake stall to raise funds for the party, eh</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:18:02 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211057#post211057</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211057#post211057</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						I'm curious why Brash is saying Epsom is no longer a priority. Either he rates himself beyond all evidence as capable of overcoming ACTs scandalous image (despite his own rather scandalous one), and pushing them beyond the threshold. Or he's got something else up his sleeve. Where's he going to?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:48:34 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mikaere Curtis</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211062#post211062</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211062#post211062</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You?ve pulled this on me before, so I won?t bother asking for an apology and retraction. But it would nice if you?d think a little about respect being a two way street and snidely dog-whistling that people you disagree with are like child abusers isn?t even close.</q><br />You may have?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:52:36 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Ranapia</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211065#post211065</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211065#post211065</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Back to that cake stall to raise funds for the party, eh</q></p><p>Oddly enough, Sacha, there are still one or two people who get off their arses and participate instead of bitching on the sidelines.  And, yes, people still fundraise for political parties old school.  You might also want to?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:55:16 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>3410</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211069#post211069</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211069#post211069</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Where's he going to stand if Banks is in Epsom?</q></p><p>Tamaki?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:58:39 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>BenWilson</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211071#post211071</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211071#post211071</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Could be &ndash; an electorate with a proud history of voting in ex-leaders of the National party, no matter how old and doddery they've become, or how much of a cock they were when they held the country in their iron fist for nearly a decade.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:04:32 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211074#post211074</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211074#post211074</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>give a little respect to the people of all political stripes and party affiliations who are going to be out on the streets campaigning</q></p><p>Wouldn't you say opposing big money and backroom power is exactly that? If I were the rank and file volunteers I'd feel mighty pissed off at?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:09:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211077#post211077</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211077#post211077</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Tamaki</q></p><p>Boscawen, innit?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:09:30 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211079#post211079</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211079#post211079</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>I'm just a little tired of being patronising</q></p><p>Glad to hear that.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:10:20 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Mike Graham</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211082#post211082</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211082#post211082</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Boscowan looks as if he might be making a play for Tamaki &ndash; ads have recently appeared in the East & Bays Courier with his office listed as being in Kohi.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:11:21 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Craig Young</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211092#post211092</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211092#post211092</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Er, no-one seems to be asking whether the Donald or John Banks *could* win Epsom for ACT. It's an urban liberal seat- look at the yes vote on the belting referendum back in 2009 and the fact that the only sitting MP that was defeated was that bent old duffer?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:49:41 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Ross Mason</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211097#post211097</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211097#post211097</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Back to that cake stall to raise funds for the party, eh</p></blockquote><p>Eh? Don will give the Brethren a call wouldn't he?</p><blockquote><p>Brash and Banks confirmed yesterday there had been talks with people within the wider National Party</p></blockquote><p>I remember the Wgtn Town Hall election public meeting in 1975 when?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:19:53 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Allan Moyle</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211100#post211100</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211100#post211100</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>Don Brash is seventy. John Banks is sixty five. Roger Douglas is seventy five. ...</q><br />I wonder if this will mean the Parliamentary budget for adult incontinence pants will need to be vastly increased?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:34:31 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Jeremy Eade</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211101#post211101</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211101#post211101</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>but I'm just a little tired of being patronising and treated like an idiot because you don't like the party I support and belong to.</p></blockquote><p>Let's call it election year fever</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:42:52 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211111#post211111</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211111#post211111</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p><q>You've got to be extracting the urine. Do you know anyone involved with ACT, or are they the Higgs boson in your model of the political universe?</q></p><p>The question really is, to what extent have significant people in the National Party been consulted, and to what extent do they support?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:59:59 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>DeepRed</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211184#post211184</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211184#post211184</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>The way things are going, here are the parties we'll be voting for...</p><p>&ndash; Il Partito Nazionale di Nuova Zelanda<br />&ndash; Il Partito Laburista di Nuova Zelanda<br />&ndash; Il Partito Verdi<br />&ndash; Il Associazione dei Consumatori e Contribuenti<br />&ndash; Nuova Zelanda Primo<br />&ndash; Il Partito Maori<br />&ndash; Uniti-Futuro Nuova Zelanda?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 16:55:04 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sacha</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211186#post211186</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-right-on/?p=211186#post211186</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hone Harawira's party has website: <a href="http://mana.net.nz" target="_blank">http://mana.net.nz</a> <br />(h/t <a href="http://twitter.com/DigitalMaori" target="_blank">DigitalMaori</a>)</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 17:24:17 +1200</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
