<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>




<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Public Address | Cafe | Cracker: Shut &#039;em Down</title>
		<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" href="http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/rss/" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		
		<description><![CDATA[A talking shop where we put the questions and our community illuminates the issues.]]></description>
			<language>en-us</language>
			<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Public Address</copyright>
			
			
			

			
		
			<item>
				<title>Public Address</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=30980#post30980</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=30980#post30980</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Discussion from blog post.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:19:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>kowhai montgomery</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=30981#post30981</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=30981#post30981</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>Personally I would have been far more inclined to ban the obsequious toad who posted comments like "I'm hoping for something bold, brave and innovative like the [National Party's] roading policy."</p><p>And</p><p>Have you watched John Keys speech on roading policy? The video is 30 minutes long but I think?</p></blockquote>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:19:07 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Michael  Fitzgerald</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31059#post31059</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31059#post31059</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Gerry backs Labour power policy, maybe John Key "leading a Labour Govt" is rubbing off?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:15:47 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Hosking</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31101#post31101</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31101#post31101</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Pretty sure that when he started Tamihere did his own stuff.</p><p>The reason for that is his comments on when Helen Clark was visiting the Pope, and there was some comment about whether or not she would, like when she met the Queen, wear a trouser suit.</p><p>Tamihere reckoned Clark?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:42:23 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Damian Christie</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31123#post31123</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31123#post31123</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The reason for that is his comments on when Helen Clark was visiting the Pope, and there was some comment about whether or not she would, like when she met the Queen, wear a trouser suit.</p></blockquote><p>Yeah, either that or a press sec who was more sympathetic to JT than?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:05:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Rob Hosking</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31124#post31124</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31124#post31124</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						The comment had the whiff of genuine JT to me...and if you mean who I think you mean, she was a bit more cautious than that.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:31:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Damian Christie</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31131#post31131</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31131#post31131</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Who knows, perhaps you're right.  I could always fire off an email to her and ask of course... like a real journalist.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:28:32 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Eric Olthwaite</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31172#post31172</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31172#post31172</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>?Which kids were those?? I asked, turning to him mid-stride? He blushed and went quiet.</p></blockquote><p>Softly Softly Catchee Monkey Christie...</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImCjdrvUJFE" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImCjdrvUJFE</a></p><p>Just hang behind them and listen in.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:44:49 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Andrew Paul Wood</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31286#post31286</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31286#post31286</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						What puzzles me is why politicians' families are not given media awareness training. Surely that's common sense?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:15:06 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Shaz</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31295#post31295</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31295#post31295</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						In my (v. limited) experience, 2 factors negated the need for *media awareness training* (yet anyway) &ndash; 1 was the family being taboo.  Given that's not to be relied on, the other was common sense sans training, i.e., don't make an arse of your family member at work. Because the?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:54:13 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Shaz</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31297#post31297</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31297#post31297</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						....Rule number 1: Don't. Be. A dick.
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:11:41 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Robyn Gallagher</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31312#post31312</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31312#post31312</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>What puzzles me is why politicians' families are not given media awareness training. Surely that's common sense?</p></blockquote><p><strong>Politician Dad:</strong> Son, as I'm now more in the public eye, this lady is here to give us some family media training.<br /><strong>Teenage Son:</strong> You're not the boss of me! I'm going to?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:34:36 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Kyle Matthews</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31323#post31323</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31323#post31323</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Point to Robyn.</p><p>Doesn't rule number 1 "Don't. Be. A dick." apply equally to Politician Dad, and Teenage Son?</p><p>Hopeful of me I know.</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:58:27 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Shaz</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31326#post31326</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=31326#post31326</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						Absolutely &ndash; frankly if they both fail that test then I'm struggling to find any sympathy.  I guess my point is that it's not that difficult to avoid looking like an arsehole. If you can't manage that, then chances are that you are in fact an arsehole, so tough titty?
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:17:54 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Sarah Lilburn</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=32443#post32443</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=32443#post32443</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hi Damian, </p><p>Thanks for the mention in your blog. </p><p>Can you please explain exactly which part of the video you think is ?defamatory?? <br />The Daily English Show places strong value on media ethics and would never intentionally defame someone. </p><p>As it says in Wikipedia, defamation is about making ?a false?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:05:25 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Russell Brown</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=32460#post32460</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=32460#post32460</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<blockquote><p>The intention of that video was to give my honest opinion of the National Party?s videos on YouTube. I certainly wasn?t trying to defame John Key and I regret that ? at least to you ? it came across that way.</p></blockquote><p>Don't worry Sarah. Damian wasn't using "defamatory" in the?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:45:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>David Haywood</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=32466#post32466</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=32466#post32466</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Sarah,</p><p>I think the defamation occurred when you implied that Key would make such a silly speech <em>without</em> being drunk.</p><p>I very much enjoyed your analysis of the videocast &mdash; and hope that the National Party will take some of your points on board...</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:33:21 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Damian Christie</title>
				<link>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=33490#post33490</link>
				<guid>http://publicaddress.net/system/cafe/cracker-shut-em-down/?p=33490#post33490</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
						<p>Hey Sarah,</p><p>Yes sorry, didn't mean to scare you.  Russell is right, I didn't mean defamatory in the sense of being legally actionable.  :)  If anything I used that term only because it started with a D.  Like "delicious".  I'll do anything for a good bit of aliteration.</p><p>So I?</p>
					]]></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:41:15 +1300</pubDate>
			</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
