Hard News: The Trophy Hunter
166 Responses
First ←Older Page 1 2 3 4 5 … 7 Newer→ Last
-
However, the issue is governance, not whether Thomson knew how much it costs to upgrade your firewall or whatever.
The thing is, it required the kind of expert audit that you'd expect your CIO to actually conduct. The fact that software upgrades hadn't been conducted as billed was discovered when Dunedin Hospital servers broke and some independent software engineers came in and they discovered that the software hadn't been upgraded as specified.
Even then, it doesn't seem to have been immediately evident what the extent of the crime was -- Swann was dismissed for "gross mismanagement" in the first instance, but Thomson also took it to the police.
-
Kyle, I think you are missing Craig's point. If the DHB Chair had been found guilty of corruption he would have missed out on being elected, but only just. Like the Alaskan senator guy.
HTH.
-
The thing is, it required the kind of expert audit that you'd expect your CIO to actually conduct....
Sort of, I'm not sure whether the overall IT spend at ODHB was completely out of whack or not.
If it was, the sort of review I'm talking about would have picked it up.
It if wasn't and Swann was clever enough to fly "under the radar" so to speak, then you're right it would have required a very detailed audit to pick it up.
But, you might suprised at the level of detail some auditors will go to, I have seen them actually ask to see version numbers and physical evidence of invoiced work having been performed. Most of the big auditing firms have specialist IT teams.
However, a determined fraudster can still get around these things.
Is there any evidence that Thompson had these things in place ?
Or are you suggesting they're not worth bothering with because IT is just too complicated and it's fair enough to just trust your senior managers ? -
There is quite a bit of additional material in the ODT today that's not online. Having followed this through the ODT over the years its been unfolding, it's kind of frustrating watching some more uninformed comment.
*There's a lot of emphasis on 17mill figure, but less on that that being 6 years worth of fraud.
*During Swann's employment 8year ODHB he claimed they handled 2.4 billion dollars worth of funds (current year figure 511).
*Therefore, the size of the fraud on an annual basis, and as a proportion of total funds is relatively low.
*Swann was fingered by an internal audit by the CFO.
*There was an increase in IT expenditure, but there is an extent to which they were paying money they could have been paying, but were not receiving any service for the money. So while the budget was larger than expected, some of the defrauded money would have been spent on IT had they had a competent manager. -
Is there any evidence that Thompson had these things in place ?
Thompson is the Chair, not the CEO. Of course, Ministers can't sack CEOs..
-
And nor can Ministers appoint CEOs, of course.
-
It's a bit like typifying artists as deriving there creativity from depravity.
I take much of my creativity from depravity, but deprivation also has a part to play.
This seems a good time to remind anyone in Wellington (or visitors) that it is Fringe Festival time again. A good chance to see artists strut their stuff and help them along with some of your hard-earned dosh. You may even see some depravity......
-
@Glenn:
There were both external and internal audits conducted through the course of the fraud, and they didn't pick it up. The external auditors said in court that they would only pick up about 5% of this kind of fraud. Swann had the massive advantage of being in charge of the department he was stealing from.
Is there any evidence that Thompson had these things in place ?
Yes, I think it was gone through extensively in court.
Or are you suggesting they're not worth bothering with because IT is just too complicated and it's fair enough to just trust your senior managers ?
They actually seem to have handled it well when it emerged there might be something bad going on -- including staying the right side of employment law in case they were wrong about Swann, and then handing it on to the SFO.
-
Thompson is the Chair, not the CEO. Of course, Ministers can't sack CEOs..
I realise that, who does the CEO report to do you think ?
Ultimate reposnbility is with the board and chairman.James - thanks for the further info, $17mill spread over 6 years doesn't make it any better in my mind.
The implication of the article abot the CFO is that prior to his involvement in 2006 there was much in the way of governance going on ?
-
Of course, if they had used Open Source Software, they would have saved a fortune. I blame Microsoft. ;-)
-
Craig, I think you know about as much as what is happening in Dunedin as I do as what is happening in your neck of the woods: Scottish Fitba Association.
There is an extensive article in today's Otago Daily Times in which every other board member and various doctors, etc, all say that Thompson is an exemplary chairman, etc, and that he should not be held to blame.
This is a lot more to do with National wanting a trophy scalp, as Labour sought with Christine Rankin, than with Thompson's performance.
-
It if wasn't and Swann was clever enough to fly "under the radar" so to speak, then you're right it would have required a very detailed audit to pick it up.
There's some answers to your questions in these. The IT spend was high (but not ridiculous), and the level of spending seemed constant (they were looking for exceptions).
http://www.odt.co.nz/news/dunedin/33754/swann-firm-top-10-odhb-suppliers
Also, Thompson wrote a letter, the latter part of which is interesting reading. I've got a few interesting bits here:
"Michael Swann's significant advantage was that he was in charge of the department he was stealing from, it was an area that few had the technical expertise to fully understand, and he never tried to hide his wealth."
"I didn't know Swann outside the work environment and apparently was one of the few people in Otago who didn't know he was wealthy.
But those who knew him did know that he was wealthy.
Most to whom I have since spoken believed that he was independently wealthy."" One of Brian Rousseau's early actions after his arrival here was to get an independent review done of our IT strategy.
The reviewers' list does not include the "contracts" because, if they existed at the time, Swann made sure they were not available to review."Also, I can't find the bit in the ODT, but I believe he got the first invoices through during a change in command, and subsequently, it was assumed that the appropriate scrutiny would have been applied when the invoices started arriving (assumption being the MOAFUs of course).
-
Therefore, the size of the fraud on an annual basis, and as a proportion of total funds is relatively low.
It seems people were flabbergasted that Swann had been able to hide it -- but IT expenditure was flat and trending downwards. They didn't have a blowout to investigate and their statutory external auditor didn't find anything either.
-
Someone should given Swann a job as an Auditor when he gets out of the big house
-
Kyle, I think you are missing Craig's point. If the DHB Chair had been found guilty of corruption he would have missed out on being elected, but only just. Like the Alaskan senator guy.
Yes I see now.
And apparently he was appointed by the Minister anyway so... I've lost Craig's point if he had a valid one.
-
Glenn -- I was arguing that it occurring over 6 years makes it less obvious.
Oh, I just saw this.
"The guilty verdict on the fraud charges isn’t the end of Swann’s legal woes — he faces a charge under the Secret Commissions Act of accepting a kickback of $757,685 from Innovative Systems, a firm run by Dunedin businessman and longtime friend Robin Sew Hoy. Innovative provided contract IT helpdesk services to the DHB between 2000 and 2006.The DHB ran an in-house helpdesk until 1998, with Innovative providing a small amount of services. After 1998, according to an NZPA report, the crown alleges there was a “significant increase” in the work carried out for the board by Innovative.
The work done by Innovative between 2000 and 2006 was charged out at $95 per hour, “which the crown contended was excessive and above industry standards”, according to NZPA.
During the six year period, the DHB paid $4,743,167 to Innovative. Of that amount, $757,685 went to Swann-controlled Computer South, despite no invoices being generated by Computer South."
-
Glenn -- I was arguing that it occurring over 6 years makes it less obvious
Fair 'nuff
The cynic in me would suggest the evidence to the court by the external auditors would be an ass covering exercise.
You could argue the same about Thompson's letter to the staff.
He's a good communicator that's for sure and know's how to do PR. -
Anyway ... how good is it that Lucinda Williams is coming in April? Got our tickets this morning.
-
Anyway ... how good is it that Lucinda Williams is coming in April?
Oh, it's great.
Who is she?
-
Oh, it's great.
Who is she?
Lucinda Williams (born January 26, 1953[1]) is an American rock, folk, and country music singer and songwriter. She recorded her first albums in 1978 and 1980 in a traditional country and blues style and received very little attention from radio, the media or the public. In 1988, she released her self-titled album, Lucinda Williams. This release featured "Passionate Kisses" a song later recorded by Mary Chapin Carpenter which garnered Lucinda her first Grammy (Best Country Song, 1994). Known for working slowly, Lucinda recorded and released only one other album in the next several years (Sweet Old World in 1992) before her greatest success came in 1998 with Car Wheels On A Gravel Road. This album presented a broader scope of songs that fused rock, blues, country and Americana into a more unique style that still managed to remain consistent and commercial in sound. It went gold and earned Lucinda another Grammy while being universally acclaimed by critics. Since Car Wheels, she has released a string of albums that have also been critically acclaimed, though none have sold in the numbers of her 1998 breakthrough. She was also named "America's best songwriter" by TIME magazine in 2002.[2]
Stolen From Wikipedia
;-) -
Anyway ... how good is it that Lucinda Williams is coming in April? Got our tickets this morning.
Bloody good -- not the biggest fan of the whole "alt-country" deal, but she does do it well. Makes me regret that she's hardly prolific -- eight or nine albums in thirty years, isn't it?
-
Yay, king of cut and paste. :-)
Now I rekon it's time for a pint. Don't nobody shoot no-one on the motorway. It took me 3/4 hour to get there last week. -
Glenn, I mention that distinction in roles because you're using the word "governance" to refer to operational management by the CFO.
-
Or is that CIO. Must be time to head for the same pub as Steve..
-
Sacha, I meant governance by the board.
But like everyone else I've had a gutsful of this.
How about that Waterview tunnel then ?
Post your response…
This topic is closed.