Posts by Boganette
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
You should really take ownership of your words Christiaan. You quoted Katrin Axelsson for a reason. Don't be disingenuous.
-
<q>I'm clearly just a lying weasel misogynous scumbag<q>
You're the one labelling yourself not me.
-
<q> As Katrin Axelsson points out 'there is a long tradition of the use of rape and sexual assault for political agendas that have nothing to do with women's safety. <q>
You don't think it's worth maybe waiting until after the court case before you imply these women are lying and it's all a conspiracy?
Oh but of course you're not implying anything about these women right? You're just "concerned" that nobody is aware of the big bad Assange conspiracy where the Bones Society or the Freemasons or the New World Order or *insert acronym here* are going to kidnap him and torture him and make him shut down WikiLeaks or some garbage. It's like a broken record. The Cult of Assange is alive and well. "Allegedly" of course.
<q> I think that's something you should consider more seriously if you're going to comment on this. <q>
And with that - you've missed the point of the entire discussion.
-
Weird how people trot out the 'you don't know him/you weren't there/he's innocent' lines about Assange but feel they can presume the ALLEGED rape victims are lying whores (despite not knowing them or being there).
Why is it not enough to clearly state that someone is entitled to the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, a fair trial and a vigourous defence? It seems that only in rape cases people feel the need to put out the idea that rape complainents are lying until it's proven they're not. And that 'alleged' must pre-face every single mention of women in cases likes these.
I don't see people using the word 'alleged' when they make-up 'facts' about these women and smear and attack them online.
-
Draco: The charges are that the first complainant, Miss A, said she was victim of “unlawful coercion” on the night of August 14 in Stockholm. The court was told Assange used his body weight to hold her down. The second charge is that Assange “sexually molested” Miss A . She told him she would not have sex with him without a condom - she withdrew her consent to sex. The third charge is of “deliberate molestation” of Miss A on August 18. The fourth charge accused Assange of having sex with a second woman, Miss W, on August 17 while she was asleep at her Stockholm home.
If you think having sex with someone when they're asleep isn't rape, or if you think it's OK to continue a sex act once someone has withdrawn consent, or if you think it's OK to hold someone down in order to have sex with them against their will then you have serious fucking issues.