Posts by Stamper Stamp
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
Envirologue: Too Big to Fail – Why…, in reply to Steve Rowe,
Hi Steve
“Still have to pinch myself that we are arguing over whether Climate Change is a “thing” ”.Nah – there is no doubt that climate changes – it is a chaotic system which has always changed and always will. The issue is – is man-made CO2 the dominant factor in current climate change?.
To quote Prof. Richard Lindzen of MIT:
“Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early 21st century’s developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally averaged temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and, on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a roll-back of the industrial age.”So – no need for panic mate – it is just another beat-up for ulterior motives.
-
Envirologue: Too Big to Fail – Why…, in reply to Ross Clark,
Hi Ross
I am not the only person who believes there is no significant increase in surface temperatures:http://www.thegwpf.com/happy-anniversary-1-october-marks-18-years-without-global-warming-trend/
So, the question remains unanswered - given that CO2 has increased from about 350ppm to 400ppm - why are we flat-lining for over 18 years? -
Envirologue: Too Big to Fail – Why…, in reply to Brent Jackson,
Hi Brent,
The attached may be of help to you. -
I still don't see the scientific relationship between Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming and CO2 given that the world's surface temperature has remain static for some 18 years to-date, while CO2 has increased from approximately 350 ppm to 400 ppm.
I would appreciate an explanation.
-
Muppet
-
Folks - if it was a 'no brainer' to move to solar - every one would do it; instead we have the arguments for/against for trying to save planet/energy/money.
It you have to argue - it is obviously NOT compelling.
So - are we going to save planet/energy/money - or are we just going to "feel good" ?
Maybe green energy isn't a reality after you have looked at the whole picture - a bit like the bio-energy fiasco. -
Folks - if it was a 'no brainer' to move to solar - every one would do it; instead we have the arguments for/against for trying to save planet/energy/money.
It you have to argue - it is obviously NOT compelling.
So - are we going to save planet/energy/money - or are we just going to "feel good" ?
Maybe green energy isn't a reality after you have looked at the whole picture - a bit like the bio-energy fiasco.
