Posts by mark taslov
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
grant i'm not against abortion, I'm a long time supporter of abortion,
-
i'm not threatening anything. i'm simply making an attempt to offer a method to cut the tax payer money spent on abortion by encouraging a little forethought.
you'll find there's a certain logic there.
-
Not at all stephen, it's about compelling people to use protection, if you read what i read above,
"except in cases of rape, proven prophylactic failure or molestation,"
If a woman doesn't want the child, she need only stop the penis before it enters the vagina
-
I'm arguing if a man vetos an abortion he should be forced to take complete financial and fiscal responsibility for that decision
-
I don't think you'd get more than a handful of cases a year where there was a dispute between the family over whether to abort the child at all, I MERELY THINK THAT BOTH PARTIES SHOULD TECHNICALLY HAVE SOME RECOURSE INTO WHAT HAPPENS WITH THEIR DNA
but furthermore i think it would promote a more forward thinknig attitude to who new zealanders f*ck when they're wasted.
-
not at all stephen, because I don't want a child. it's not really the issue, it's not about me, it's about the objectifcation of males, and the trivialization of sexual intercourse, brought about from living a long time in a country where abortion is a non issue and where unprotected sex is rampant.
-
lucy, if you want to do it with an actual man, without taking the necessary precautions to get the desired result, and involve that man's DNA in your own uterus, then turn around and moan about risk and strain, of achieving the standard result of a well known bilogical reaction, and expect taxes to pay for what you do with the man's DNA, then you probably should have had a little foresight.
-
B. Jones, as far as i understand it, females have come complete control of their bodies and do have the right to consent or not to unprotected sexual intercourse.
-
pretty much with andrew hubbard on this.
There is no universal Right to Choose in the sense of universal right over one's own body or there'd be no strip search, imprisonment or compulsory vaccination.
...age of consent, illegality of the best recreational drugs etc etc etc
- should also add,
What of the rights of the father?
absolutely none?
a father can't prevent an abortion of his child?to trivilize this,
torture is ok in guantanamo because we wouldn't want to decide what the US gov can do inside their own building.
The father should have the right to veto abortion. except in cases of rape, proven prophylactic failure or molestation, if an agreement can't be reached then the state should provide mediation and counselling to any of the casualties.
why?
1 because abortion is paid for by the tax payer
2 because sexual intercourse can bring about pregnancy in the adult female -