Posts by Dylan Reeve
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
Oh this is great, wonder why I've never delved into here before...
It's not the boobs, it's what they're doing with them.
Indeed. And if there were breast licking, and overt sexual acts then the law would be pretty clear. But breast, on their own attached to the chest of a woman on the back of a motorcycle are not pornographic, regardless of the occupation of their owner.
You don't see dairies or bookshops flaunting their dirty mags - mostly we don't have to face up to in your face porn. (I think the way we are geared to see the women on those bikes is pornographic - might be wrong.)
I think your local dairy is pretty crappy, or you're not look up the top of the magazine shelf.
Pornography isn't really content, but context. I can show you (well, I could, but I won't) pornographic images where the participants are completely clothed. Similarly there are many famous works of art that feature completely naked figures without much or any disagreement on their artistic merit.