Posts by Keith Ng
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
OnPoint: Peek-a-boo, I can't recall…, in reply to
The cost-benefit calculation taking place on the 9th floor of a building in Wellington is likely to be coming down on the side of cost quite soon, I'd say.
Maybe it's a Sunk Cost Fallacy thing. "FFS, we smeared ourselves with so much shit to get Banks in here, we can't just waste it..."
-
Thanks!
-
Also, just looked up a few: The Financial Review numbers don't match with the Treasury numbers and neither match with the directly OIAed numbers. "Don't match" as in they look like completely different numbers.
-
OnPoint: Some of My Best Friends are Consultants, in reply to
Thanks!
-
OnPoint: Some of My Best Friends are Consultants, in reply to
Select committees ask departments for information about contractors and consultants. How many and total cost is required for every department's yearly financial review. Those numbers exist.
Little help?
I've been going through Select Committee reports on Financial Reviews and evidence submitted to them, but haven't found anything. Could you point me in the right direction?
-
OnPoint: Some of My Best Friends are Consultants, in reply to
Ah! The Financial Reviews. That's what I'm doing next.
-
I/S: Sure, there wasn't enough to convict, and he was therefore rightly not charged - but why does that taint the Police's view that it was "more likely deliberate"?
Are you saying that you don't believe the Police's view was formed in good faith, or are you saying that regardless, they shouldn't say anything because charges weren't laid?
-
So much fail.
-
OnPoint: 195,508 people can't be that lazy, in reply to
Uh.. yes. That was me too. Tried to embed interactive Google Doc charts. Did not go so well.
-
GAAAAHHHH!!! I thought I'd unpublished this. The Registered Jobseekers thing is actually not a good proxy for toughness of the labour market because the policy on registration for welfare has changed.
Many, many apologies. Ignore this post.