Wow at the spread of the live feed. It feels like we are hurt in the middle of others extremist nuttery- but so much? Omg
The reaction has been strong and tearful.
This is an attack on Christchurch and New Zealand. It causes resentment or worse between NZ and Australia, which has also experienced terror. It may do similarly with our 5 eyes partners. It certainly makes some of them look bad. It may also damage our tourism or reputation.
It is an attack on peace and sanctuary. It brings war and mindless hate here and makes refugees fearful.
The military style planning is chilling. This is different.
Given the shooters background and travelogue it is suspicious. It leaves open the possibility there may be truths we will never know. Who aided and abetted?
I hope we are sensible in maintaining a free and open society, while protecting ourselves as best as we can.
Yet as well…
Like when Taika said we were a racist country, we must examine ourselves.
I don’t open think the ‘this is not who we are’ should hide that. Guyon and others sharing their life stories isn’t wrong, though it may hurt and be difficult to reconcile.
Christ, church and the lion heart are heroes of the Anglo inheritence. Who saves Robin Hood at the 11th hour? These were shining badges of our righteous compassion. Not to all.
I saw a friend share a tweet asking if there had never been white supremacist violence how come the country is called New Zealand? Inflammatory, but thought provoking.
We are being challenged from without and within and I hope we emerge closer to our friends and with fewer or no enemies.
I apologise , having read through, if that is a bit detached for those posting who find this in their neighborhoods, or commute. Aroha and love, hugs.
And exactly, if this bs were about free speech use the parks, the squares and the street corners.
Free speech doesn't mean the right to soil a venue's brand- surely the right to treat comes in here? There is no requirement to offer a venue to anyone? Though, yes, well aware of this being a slippery slope and this being turned back on legitimate politics, rather than rah-rah self publicists.
Any chance of this being worked up into a shareable post? This is one of the best commentaries on the whole mess- not giving focus to loud mouths, but to the society that really finds them unnecessary.
Is the one year time frame a kick of a can down the road?
Some projects are ready and just needing a funding tick. Is it possibily that this, for whatever reason and we can hazard a few, is an ambitious pubic broadcasting initiative that is not ready to apply for funding at this time.
Does the one year thing mean- get your house in order and apply for further funding when you have things organised?
Sorry under a rock and seem to have missed that Dick Griffin had left RNZ.
Is this true? Have you got a link? I couldn’t find anything recent in a 2 second google.
EDIT: sorry found it now. Didn't come up when I googled Richard Griffin or Dick Griffin.
How much has he been responsible for recent changes at RNZ, including things such the new late night programme, Wallace Chapman and Jesse Mulligan, the website and so on? These seemed to be very much in line with someone who could deliver RNZ+.
How much is he responsible for, for example, David Farrar commentating as 'Pollster David Farrar' and the continuity if you like, in political commentary? This is a much less welcome thing.
went to a T20 cricket game in the UK. Felt like such a grown up.
NZ rules would have been 2 4% beers after a 30 minute queue or something like that (1/6 of a T20 game).
In the natwest they had a problem with pint snakes- disposable cups being put together to make a long line. The solution?
Two pronged. Firstly, for pints charge for commemorative cups with a refund of one pound, so no one will throw them away and secondly, to give the punters beer in 2 pints disposable cups, instead of one. That's right- a litre of beer in each hand without calling you an idiot or a potential criminal. Didn't see one fight or altercation. Great atmosphere
There was a great quote at the end of that interview which basically said- it's a basically a non-event.
The tragedy around this is that while a lot of Labour voters obviously got the point (and not all obviously) not all did. There has been a long overdue move away from stigmatising the poor and there needs to be more.
See the reaction that she dared to be political while on a benefit! A poor person!
Double Dipton, Oravida, signing a painting for charity...my gosh when did they annoint St. Matthew?
Yep- the Greens seem to have done a fantastic job of tactical voting- if Labour voters had done better in key seats it could have been enough.