Posts by nzlemming
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
Hard News: Finally, the Teapot Tape?, in reply to Sacha,
DON'T GIVE THEM IDEAS!
-
Hard News: Finally, the Teapot Tape?, in reply to Graeme Edgeler,
Did the police just disclose the existence of a potentially illegally-recorded private communication?
Delicious, isn't it?
-
Hard News: Finally, the Teapot Tape?, in reply to linger,
Again, muppet move, and not an endearing muppet either.
I'm torn between Animal on P, or Oscar on a diet. Then again, Ernie can be a spiteful prick when you hide his rubber duckie.
-
Hard News: The Mega Conspiracy, in reply to Rick Shera,
Further to @nzlemming’s and my agreement (an unusual occurence)
All we need now is Farrar to say "ditto" and we'll be counting down the end days.
-
Hard News: Finally, the Teapot Tape?, in reply to 3410,
Is there any topic about which that guy is not completely clueless?
No. Really, really no.
-
Hard News: The Mega Conspiracy, in reply to Rick Shera,
Could you ever let that rest?
Frankly, my dear, I don't give a Dann!
-
Hard News: The Mega Conspiracy, in reply to Rick Shera,
So, there’s an interlocutory argument waiting to go all the way to the Supreme Court for a start.
I get the feeling this one's going to be a long haul, yes.
-
Hard News: The Mega Conspiracy, in reply to Rick Shera,
Ah, it's Rick Tensing, the famous sherpa ;-)
-
Hard News: The Mega Conspiracy, in reply to Craig Ranapia,
I’ll grant that relying on The Herald is a dangerous thing, and that’s where I have a difficulty. On the face of it, this super-secret affidavit from an unnamed Customs official seems to have stated the bleeding obvious without closing the argument that Dotcom’s flight risk is so severe even a curfew, mandatory reporting & electronic monitoring isn’t an option.
From reading the judgement, the affidavit was given in closed court because it detailed exactly how porous the border is and how easy it was to get false documentation edit: and how one would go about it, but that's just my reading.
-
Hard News: The Mega Conspiracy, in reply to Rob Stowell,
Interesting thought. But I think, like some of the TechCrunch commentators, that you don't put together an operation like this in 4-6 weeks. The amount of information detailed in the indictment speaks to a considerable period of surveillance and preparation, which the authorities say was 2 years. Like the SOPA/PIPA protests, I'd guess that this was coincidental and not linked to the raid.