Why does that sound so rude?
I mean, I don't think it would have been such a huge deal for Catholics - and it did seem to be, at the time - if they'd all thought it was just a... suggestion.
There's a lovely book by David Lodge called The British Museum is Falling Down, which deals with a Catholic couple waiting for the Humanae Vitae to be issued, desperately hoping it will allow them to use some kind of contraception and still be good Catholics. It doesn't appear to be a 'suggestion'.
Lodge's Wikipedia article mentions his Catholicism, btw.
He sort of has, back when he was leader, at the time Labour had a recognising Maori spirituality clause in the Local Govt Bill [they later took it out]. Talked about how he had spiritual values but how it was wrong, as well as impractical, to give them the force of law.
You could pray every night and do what God told you, and still not want to legislate that other people do the same. And I may be shallow, but if my MP was doing that, I'd really want to know.
(Actually, I live in Wigram. That could explain a lot.)
I am a bit worried about letting my boy see dozens of pictures of a starved naked man getting crucified
This may work as some kind of mitigation.
To get mildly back on topic, I think (probably rather bitchily today) that if Bill was prepared to stand up in public and say 'my religion, and my wife's religious views, are no influence on my political life or decision-making', then okay. But if he's not, then surely those things belong in his bio, in that they shape his life in some way. Would we remove any mention of religion from Peter Dunne's?
Well it does suck that Catholics have got all the good art.
It's the angst that does it.
From what I can tell, it's Anglicans they're bitter on, not atheists.
This is more than returned, at least if my family is anything to go by.
Lots of people here, who say or imply "the drug had a great effect on me, so the research must be wrong", are missing an important point: how do you know you were not being given a sugar pill?
Two weeks of crippling side-effects going on? Six freaking months of being weaned off the super-dose my dr put me on when I pointed out they weren't working? And the intervening time spent feeling like I'd been entirely encased in perspex.
yes there are misdiagnosed people, yes some GPS over prescribe. but , better a few extra prescriptions than a few extra deaths eh.
Except it's not that simple. Some of those misdiagnosed people are actually ILL. Doling out SSRIs to every patient who mentions the word 'tired' stops people getting proper treatment. The problem's not the pills themselves, but how they're being used.
And I can't for the life of me understand why Bill Clinton still get treated like a rock star, though I've got to admit the Clinton Charisma always struck me as somewhat opaque.
Well he was the first PILF in my lifetime.
Those of us with families have already had our tax cuts...
Those of us with families who work. It's a quiet little niggle, but the very poorest families got absolutely nothing out of WFF.
I think it was a lot easier in 1990 to put your finger on what was wrong at the time, though that might be an effect of retrospection. Things were improving but not fast enough. We'd been promised there'd be a rocky patch, and then things would improve. We got six years of 'jam tomorrow' and no jam.
Add to that, Labour was tearing itself apart from the inside, with the waka-jumping of Anderton and the formation of New Labour.
This year... for all the soul-searching and talk about 'social engineering', I think Labour's greatest enemy is our sense of fair play. They've been on the swing for too long and it's time to give someone else a turn.