Sorry, I told a lie. There is not one BS Len Brown story on the front of the Herald web page. There are two.
Wait- on the front page of the Herald there are calls for recall elections. On the basis of 'secret rooms'.
The Herald. Gutter journalism since I don't know about a year ago. Before Granny was a Tory from on high, now she's down and dirty.
Well something divides the PAS.
This is not like the Clark years though, very obviously. The leader has been selected by the party and the caucus, so previous precendents are a little shakey.
Could be looking ahead to coalition negotiations and potential leadership changes? Sounding out about Peters and English.
…Iannucci shows us everything that is going on- all the pants-sh*tting, the swearing, the horrible moments of truth, the contemplating of living with mind-curdlingly daft compromises, the panic, the inspired moments, the haranguing, the small wins, the palaver and also he gets quite a few laughs for it.
"We can only hope that the proposed changes don’t break things that don’t need fixing."
Here was me thinking that as a provider of Radio about NZ, radio NZ already had an excellent internet service. Concerned about any changes. After Guyon to Morning Report I'd need to feel that the service was going to remain clearly and significantly a public service and not feel the need to ape commercial stations.
I read analysis of the Canute story somewhere.
It has come down to us in two forms. One, in which Canute was a prideful king who was showing off and two, in which he was a wise king who wanted to teach his foolish sycophants a lesson.
The possibility of the first happening on climate change doesn’t really bear too much thinking about. Not a great idea for us.
Also: David Mitchell who is mostly the rant king.
I've thought- completely non-seriously- about starting a GST Taxpayers Union seeing as how we are not represented in the net tax figures. And how there are so many of us.
Or if those who wish to oppose them didn’t willfully mishear and misinterpret.
See Cunliffe on the Nation or Parker on Q and A as good clear explanations of their policy at this point.
Suppose I should point out that I haven't heard the NatRad thing, but there has been a lot of good explanation of it since the release of the monetary policy. It's an idea at this stage, the mechanics of it don't seem to have been decided or worked out. Given their innovative monetary policy I don't see why they can't be- though it would be good for immigrants to get clear signals.
I think that there would be a lot of left critiquing of Len, especially around things like PPP, the waterfront, the ice-cream contracts etc etc
except that the idea of an American style attempt at impeachment after an election aided by less than objective journalism really has got the goat of many here.
Len has got some questions to ask, and you almost feel that a more morally rigorous line of attack might have damaged him more. As it is, the way the opposition to Len is going on, it feels that in the main, those who didn't like him to begin with are just enjoying the opportunity to complain. Their complaints I've noticed, in particular Dick Quax, quickly turn away from anything that the mayor has actually done to the council policy in general which he opposes.