I think I've missed your point somewhere, but how many other politicians full stop are making such statements. Very few? Mostly the women? Frankly, I think this nit-picking for the guy's first interview is quite petty.
He's saying the right things, even if they're not all the things that could be in our anti-violence shopping lists. Some more experienced politicians could step up as well, frankly, since it's hardly an issue confined to Maori. There don't seem to be legions of them lined up to read from this "script" or garnering all these pats on backs.
I have to agree that the ins and outs of which lawyer and/or firm drafted the letter is a distraction from the issue.
It's the trust boards and their principals who are acting at best defensively and at worst quite aggressively against individuals and journalists asking hard but fair questions.
Let's point the finger there, please. And if I were a member of a community whose funds were being used and their blood, sweat and tears, I'd want some answers myself.
Because there appear to be some feather beds being well-lined by some elites in those groups. I often think the "if you have nothing to hide" argument is tosh, but for publicly-accountable trusts, being open is a good thing.
And thanks for the message that society is about adjusting, Sasha. For everyone.
Love Jordan Reyne's voice, since she featured on that album by Baitercell and Schumacher. Glad to hear some new sounds
I think if Winston gets in there as a nice bandaid to certain voting sectors, such a combination would prove more intractable to get rid of. And when he is being pandered to with a sufficiently-senior ministry, he does know how to keep his mouth shut. At least about the govt.
And what Craig sez too about Winton's social justice history. I'd rather not have someone with a senior govt role with such obvious biases against queers and immigrants.
As for Jones, I think the only thing "strategic" about his rantings is that the powers-that-be are very obviously not telling him to STFU. A lazy way to appeal to the Green-haters.
Really nice tribute to Mr Knuckles. I am not really a fan of metronomic 4/4 house (I like breakbeat better), but his style was never metronomic. And kept those feet on the dancefloor, indeed.
Oooh, no, let's not go anywhere near the idea of "voting tests". A little too reminiscent of the American Jim Crow laws that disqualified many black people from voting for bullshit reasons (people who couldn't read lengthy passages from the bible, when many were substantially illiterate)
Pox, NZ On Screen may be different. Simple url: http://www.nzonscreen.com/title/take-3-2007
Not available outside NZ
Don't you simply enter the page URL for the YouTube clip? I.e. what you're pasting in should have no embed code/angle brackets of its own?
I dislike this whole thing of confusing someone's (admittedly extreme) collecting tastes, and deciding that this is somehow worthy of public or political note.
Would I personally associate with someone with a signed Mein Kampf? No, unless it was alongside a similar collection of signed works by Stalin, Roosevelt, Churchill, Mussolini etc, or intended to be. Frankly, I find the whole idea of collecting war memorabilia squicky in itself, and I doubt I'd ever have any close friends who would (except maybe family heirlooms). But it is an acceptable hobby to most.
If it was part of a collection of Nazi memorabilia and nothing else, yes, worthy of note, definitely. Ugh. If it were part of a collection on the massacres carried out by Pol Pot, Mao, Stalin, etc, and nothing else, I would probably have concerns about their fitness for public office. Then again, my very sweet and with-it in-laws have a book case full of stories on serial murderers.
There are plenty of public figures who do distasteful things, but barring any more sinister associations, owning an out-there but historical work is far less morally problematic to me than those who engage in domestic abuse, or who actually hold racist/sexist/-ist beliefs, and who try to retain them in our laws.