I haven't been to Auckland since I was a kid, but all I see on the news and such (google knows all, but won't tell me) is traditional section divisions and huge apartment blocks. Are there still no skinny 3-story townhouse rows for packing in people? That's the problem here, right.
Because I've played Sim City, and that medium density housing is the shiznit. Lets your public transport become efficient and well used, makes optimal use of distributed fire and police stations, health clinics, saves schooling costs, all sorts. Lets you pack your amenities around them and provide cheap happiness boosts to good numbers of people.
Low density certainly lets you crank up the rates, but they all end up going on massive motorway projects to shift everyone around, huge school catchments, extra water costs, and so on. All those cars, nightmares.
High density's alright once your office blocks can support a decent subway system, but that in turn needs fed by your medium density base.
Yes, I'm sort of kidding. You shouldn't have to have played the various Sim City games as much as I have over the years to know all that.
I don't think I ever really got how decent a place PAS is before this. I wish I had something to add, but y'all are doing superbly. So is the internet in general, it should be said.
Perhaps a review. Triggers, sorry.
* The police lie. All the time. It's their default response to being questioned (and presenting evidence, making enquires, etc).
* The police want convictions so bad (it's how they're reviewed and promoted, after all) that they will not even take reports of crimes where a conviction might be difficult to achieve. They will lie about this too.
* The police consider rape is difficult to convict. Which it clearly is, due to the issues around what counts as a valid defence.
There are a good many layers of problems there. Not readily solved either. Obviously one would start by incentivising report takers to take reports. Then incentivise those who bring cases to bring cases. I get the courts would be busy, but it seems they'd be busy with rapists, so fund them some more hours, appoint some more judges, and get on with it.
But then ...
"These young guys should just grow up," Key said this afternoon.
See, there's problems with incentives in the police force, problems with the trial structure too, but holy shit the problems with rape culture seem to overwhelm them by a very large amount. Grow up? So, stop wearing your pants so low, get a tie and jacket, hold your head up in public, and oh, stop raping people. So childish. Really?
Fixing that could sort some of the ridiculous things juries accept as a defence for rape, in line with lowering the number of rapists so as to not fill up the courts and prisons too fast as the police think it a good idea to do something in response.
So, just from an outside perspective, y'all are talking about subsidising exports, right? I mean, we're exporting the production of local labour here, so that's how I'd categorise it. Selling the production of films to foreigners.
Because subsidising exports is a universal disaster. Horrible stuff. All your local capital and skill gain goes into gobbling up the subsidies, rather than seeking out natural market profits. Market distortions and so on, the underlying cause of boom and bust cycles.
Wool mountain, Butter mountain, (psst, milk powder mountain, giant truck mountain), film production capacity mountain. Whoops, did it again.
Now, yes, these subsidised exports produce a lot of high-paid local specialists, some of y'all are here. But there's no natural market for your investment in time and money, never was, certainly not locally, and that's the whole problem. More subsidies just distort the market further and drive more capital into this false investment opportunity.
I was at Otago ~18 years back, but I don't recall any physiology papers, nor straying into their lectures. More Math, Physics, Cosc, a touch of History and Philosophy. Plus, lectures ultimately failed to be anything like as interesting as I had been promised, so I wasn't at all that many of them. 8]
@Devaluing. Right. When one points out that Olympic sprinters have some advantageous genetic predispositions in regards their physiological responses to sprint training, it doesn't devalue their actual sprinting, which is amazing.
Similarly, Aspies do tend to get really good at their special interests and it doesn't devalue how good they are at them. It's more, you know, pointing out the things they'll benefit from some extra help with, typically.
And like you said, Russel, for me too, having a list of the ways in which everyone else (give or take) is actually different, and that it's a thing with a name, that's very nice to have. Even though there's a thing around the net where that's not accepted at all, which is another story.
Re: Salon article.
Must say, that is the most ridiculous piece of shit essay on anything I have read in a long time. It’s, well sums itself up quite nicely.
When we mistake a brainy, introverted boy for an autism spectrum disordered one, we devalue his mental gifts.
Or … when we notice that autistic people include fucking Einstein and Newton, maybe we notice that exceptional mental gifts are exactly what you bloody well hope for on the spectrum and maybe don’t get otherwise. Even though almost all of us aren’t quite so lucky.
Hell, the other force of his argument is that people with social difficulties who get extra help with that can improve a little, in an argument where he in effect suggests we not give so many people help like that.
It’s like finding that people were sick and you gave them medicine and then later they weren’t sick any more so obviously that medicine was all wasted. I am struck by the massive stupidity of it.
Which I guess makes me too fucking smart to be on the spectrum too. ?!
Ramadan is where you eat a huge breakfast and huge dinner so you can skip lunch, because everyone's skipping lunch (or a few people anyway, there's a lot of exemptions). The community spirit there is where you gather to celebrate eating big, together. It's like thanksgiving every night for a month.
Lent is where you go vegan for a month (again, with a lot of exemptions), and again, everyone is doing it. It was during the part of the year where meat and so on was hard to get anyway (or at least economically hard to justify).
The new 40-hour famine is where a bunch of impressionable tweens are told they're very good for being hungry while everyone around them is eating and being hassled about their weight.
Noting that technology costs are themselves driven by the cost of employees in the technology sector, so it's really a race between the ultimate productivity of different skill sets. At least in theory.
Good capitalists are always putting some poor bugger out of a job, after all, unless the entrenched interests can stack the deck in their own favor.
It seems kinda silly to have a law that only protects sources and journalists who don't own cellphones or computers, eh. Almost like someone should be thinking of some amendments there, sometime.
Not that it'll matter once the GCSB's running the infrastructure. It's not like they bothered about warrants before they had all that power.
Still, enjoy your attempts at cloak & dagger folks, and good luck picking software, operating systems, and hardware that the NSA hasn't built any backdoors into for the whole world to browse.
Interesting problem for the left this sort of thing. When you're all on the side of truth and justice it's common to nitpick and argue trying to find the best expression, where the fascists on the right all just march along to the same mind-numbing propaganda.
Like how the green party policies are "all mad", except the ones you read, turns out those ones are awesome and obviously good for everyone. Shame about all those ones you haven't read, because they're all mad, still.
Of course, most National voters don't actually like National party policy. When you tell them they just think you're lying, because that's not the sort of thing they'd vote for. People are weird.
Witches, eh. You'll know 'em when you see 'em. All out to eat your children they are. Horrible. Don't wait 'till the kids are in the pot, just watch for the signs; black cats, night walks, unmarried women, don't attend church, said anything bad about the witchfinder, denied the danger of witches.
As to racism in mass media, yes it is very bad and hurts us all. Same as racism in justice, education, and employment, which all feed each other. There's pretty good statistical proofs of that about the place now, but like climate change, a lot of people don't want to hear it.
Censorship is also very bad and hurts us all, in that people think the stuff which gets through is OK, when a lot of it is very bad indeed (that usually being the point of it), and a lot of the things which get blocked are just minority political statements. One rather fine thing it does is limit popular censorship, which is often much worse.
Same as any old rubbish justice system is better than a lynch mob.