Posts by SHG
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
If Labour addresses the need for nationwide public-interest broadcasting by setting up a personality-driven TV station in Auckland, you know they’re part of the problem too.
-
Hard News: 1984, Cambridge Analytica and…, in reply to Hilary Stace,
“Seems”?
-
I delete all my social media channels over xmas and haven't regretted it once. every day is better without socmed in my life.
-
remember postal votes are about 25% of the total, not included in exit polling.
-
I don't get why this is an issue again in January 2017, especially featuring words like "it has been revealed" as if this was some dark secret that we've only just learned. The CHAI donation and discussion of it was covered by the NBR at least THREE TIMES last year:
https://www.nbr.co.nz/article/mfat-under-fire-donations-clinton-linked-charity-jw-p-196621
Hell, even the nutty conspiracy sites had blown their loads by the first week of November:
http://uncensored.co.nz/2016/11/05/nz-taxpayer-funds-pledged-to-shady-clinton-charity/
Why is this a thing in the Herald now in the second week of January? -
Hard News: From Zero: The Meth Episode, in reply to Mark Graham,
how do you think this changes the perception of meth? I always saw it as one of the truly evil drugs (never used, never exposed to it) with a genuine probability of addiction.
used it, enjoyed it, didn't get addicted, cut it along with other luxuries during the great saving-for-a-house budget crunch of the early 2000s, the end.
truly TEH EVIL!!1
-
I'm so old I remember when public address wasn't Rob Salmond's personal NATIONAL IS BAD MMMKAY blog
-
Up Front: What Sorry Looks Like, in reply to Dinah Dunavan,
I had to run away from The Standard when I read the comments section
Don't worry, that's how most people react.
-
Au contraire, Labour needs to keep Mallard, King, Goff, Cosgrove, and all the other troughers around so the voting public can be reminded what the party stands for.
-
RoK isn't a "them". It's one guy who sells advertising on a website. When he gets mentioned in the media then more people visit the website which means he can charge more for advertising. Every time the mainstream media so much as acknowledges his existence, he wins.
In other words this whole week has been pure unadulterated winning for him. Announce meetups! Coverage! Insult female journalists about the meetups! Coverage! Defiantly promise to hold the meetups regardless of criticism! Coverage! Abruptly cancel meetups! Coverage!
Next: journalists chasing Roosh for comment on the abrupt cancellations will get insulted! Coverage!
Every time. They fall for it every time.