Posts by Lyndon Hood
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
Aaand Simon Power has confidence the present negotiations will result in a code of practise and will support its implementation.
</sigh>
-
These black gravatars make my brain think everyone is the same person.
-
Graeme - AFAIK you're right that it doesn't actually say that.
For example, I think the code of practise actually has basically four uncontested accusations. I happen to think that remains draconian anyway, and since the code does not appear to be viable that may be moot.
I assume an accusation would not be the default interpretation in a court. But the law provides no mechanism for establishing the facts it refers to. It's mostly the non-judicial practises that worry me and at the moment things seem to be at the accusation side of things.
And of course, I still struggle to think of anything good about the clause.
-
Fry sez:
# Last thing I wanted to do was bring down the geekzone site. I did warn them, but they asked me to tweet the issue anyway. 10 minutes ago from web
-
From Scoop
I know people get Scoop and Stuff confused, but in the same link?
-
Yeah, the gravatar link. I have it as better now.
-
Heh. Russell entered link data the wrong way round.
-
what does "done professionally" mean?
Crispy brown on the outside, but still succulent and tender in the middle.
-
The Code of Practise lives:
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/BU0902/S00085.htm
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/BU0902/S00083.htm -
Pleased to loose my mental side-bet that all the comments would be about the wine by the time I got here.
And on an entirely different point, your use of "sav" is another example in addition to "tute" of abbreviations spelt to fit English language conventions, not the word they were abbreviated from.
Eerily, it's also better adapted to the phrase 'a fair suck of the sav' than the origina sav. Especially in this case.