Posts by ScottY
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
TROLL!
-
pfj, you need help to communicate effectively.
Try these people. They're good.
-
Thank you Mark. I'm hopeless with these interknots. Serves me right for trying to be clever (and yes you got the right site)
-
pfj, I'll assume for a moment that you're well meaning and not some troll.
You might get a better reception, however, if you:
- don't criticise everyone else
- especially don't stray off topic for the sole purpose of attacking RB (he's like our guru, man!)
- write coherent, short sentences. You wouldn't talk that way, would you?If that's too hard, can I suggest you try this site next?
-
Best use foe feijoas - freeze the pulp, then when winter hits make Apple and Feijoa Crumble (basically just Apple Crumble with feijoa in). Divine.
Actually, the other day we were watching Parliament TV (hadn't tried it before), and they were discussing the new Patent Bill. Suspect that if its provisions also go as far as copyright, then DB would have no such claim over a name like Radler in future. Actually, seems the Patents Bill is just for patents.
Yes, nothing to do with trade marks. Have a look here if you're interested (apologies for shameless promotion of employer). Rich Lock can bore you to tears with more detail.
-
Getting slightly more on-topic, the Michael Laws article in the SST had this to say about SIDS:
It's like medical authorities trying to scare parents not to share beds with their children. Yes, some drunk, drugged insensate mums do roll over and asphyxiate their kids, but most of us don't. This natural bonding process between breast-feeding mum and infant is portrayed as akin to child abuse.
I wonder if he will bother to read this in today's paper.
-
the very-much flogged dead horse of Darwin's theory
When did this horse die? Did I miss something?
You know, pfj, it's okay to use full stops on this site. We promise not to judge you (for that, anyway).
-
At any rate, I would rather strongly debate that religion enjoys "exceedingly complex relations to the theory of biological evolution in its now myriad forms" if that is meant to say that religion explains biology. It doesn't.
So is that what s/he was trying to say...
a learned, dedicated ignorance
How do I get me some?
-
to p forrester jarvie (if that is your actual name): Please reread what you posted and then tell us why we shouldn't call you a pretentious ass.
-
And big ups to PA System's own ScottY for helping out and making me feel bad about teasing lawyers.
You should feel bad. We're sensitive souls.