Posts by andin
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
Hard News: 2014: The Meth Election, in reply to Jake Starrow,
Boy that reads like a puff piece! No wonder it took you so long to reply.
-
Its a wet saturday and I was sorta waiting for Jack Sparrow to compose a reply. It'll be a one hit wonder no doubt. So I foolishly went and read Jamie Whyte opening speech.
Man that boy must have had some serious drugs to come up with that saga, making a monster of everyone except djonkey ....and yet....and yet, a nitpick here, a nitpick there. Now I just want soma -
Hard News: 2014: The Meth Election, in reply to Jake Starrow,
preference that people with opposite opinions to yours
Oh Woe, those of the oppressed majority
-
Hard News: 2014: The Meth Election, in reply to Jake Starrow,
Being selective in you judgement never promotes credibility
Oh the old "lets be fair to everyone" gambit. Being used by a supporter? (whatever you are) is a kinda sick joke.
-
Up Front: Oh, God, in reply to Bart Janssen,
+1
-
The only happy crew are the gang that used to run things.
Yep once they’ve rode out the hysteria they’ll knock off the Faceman.
He’s gettin’ to be a dead bird round their necks anyway…
OO snap! -
Up Front: Oh, God, in reply to WH,
Overall, though, I think you were clearly told not to do this.
Swine are much maligned and mistreated,
And that verse can be used by so many it renders it meaningless. -
Up Front: Oh, God, in reply to UglyTruth,
evidence of deity interacting with the world, eg fire and brimstone.
That's your "evidence"?
Try a little harder would you. -
Up Front: Oh, God, in reply to mark taslov,
“asses”,
Only because 'mericans spell it different 'cause it reminds them of donkeys.
The proper way offends their sensitive souls HAH! -
Up Front: Oh, God, in reply to UglyTruth,
which is a more irrational position given the number of witnesses who support the idea of theism, and the fundamental difficulty in proving that they are wrong.
You can't prove a negative! So if your only support is numbers of people believe such and such, while a smaller number take an opposite position. Which is then defined by you. You obviously know nothing, and are an arsehole too boot.