Posts by Grant Dexter
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
Obliged for the response, Craig.
I disagree (naturally :). I would do everything in my power to make sure she did not go through with her plan and I would cut her off if she did.
Anybody else?
-
So, uh Steve, when you said there was nothing against rape and child abuse in the bible you were ignoring the examples I provided, right?
-
Dylan, you seem to love bureaucracy... not to mention Morgan. You also seem to have rejected the idea of proper authority completely. Let me clue you in. What you describe is not authority .. it's the ability people have to express opinion.
Steve - try Deuteronomy 22:25-27 and Ephesians 6:1-4
-
How would people here respond were their daughter, mother, sister or wife to announce they were going to pursue a career in the sex industry?
-
I love a good slanging match as much as the next guy, but being one of the bad guys here I consider myself more prone to being banned. Thus I prefer to restrict my discussions and descriptions to a limited set of responses. Now, if I could get some sort of immunity .. :think:
:D
-
Calling someone facile, naive, disingenuous, incoherent, downright infuriating and superficially civil is considered civil?
I think I prefer the inventive re-spellings of my name....
-
If you don't quite understand Morgan's problem then read his post where he said authority needs to be constantly reviewed and checked. Now you are claiming that the population is the real authority. My point should be obvious...
... but then again, this is a liberal forum....
-
Tony. Thanks for backing me up. Perhaps you could explain things to Morgan.
-
:D Thanks, Matty. I really should have been able to get closer after having just gone through Europe, but I enjoyed the response anyway :)
-
Dinah. Someone is about to blame me for the length :)
In interstellar news...
Morgan wants to know how he is a hypocrite.
Morgan doesn't seem to want to respond to simple questions. Big surprise there. Morgan, one more time. If a group has the power to check and control laws made by a government made doesn't that make the group the higher authority?
Morgan freely admits that he is justified in defying laws because he sees fit, but has the temerity to mock and ridicule others for doing the same. You're a hypocrite, Morgan.
Morgan thinks that a different name for a bunch of laws will help our courts do away with unjust legislation that manages to get through. He thinks more laws with a different name are another safeguard against the poorly thought through kneejerk legislation that tends to win short term favour in the public eye. Morgan is deluded. :)
Morgan thinks the council is not allowed any moral judgement.
Morgan thinks he won because the parade went ahead. Were you riding or driving, mate?
Morgan thinks everyone got their say - not their way - and that is fair. But one group got their way which necessitated the opposition. Morgan is a moron who doesn't understand that in a battle there needs to be a victor. And Morgan is a hypocrite because if it had been the council or the protesters that had won then he'd be crying foul like a stuck pig.
Morgan thinks that laws he promotes are about protecting everyone, but doesn't understand that millions would rightly reject what he thinks is "just OK".