Posts by nzlemming
Last ←Newer Page 1 2 3 4 5 Older→ First
-
Hard News: The Hager saga continues, in reply to Ben Austin,
Speaking of Wishart, what has he been up to of late?
Don't say the name too often. It's like the C-ndym-n...
-
Hard News: Dirty Politics, in reply to mark taslov,
I've been linking to this as contrast.
-
Hah, John Key lies. Film at eleven.
-
Hard News: Doing over the witness, in reply to Rosemary McDonald,
And Hide holds nothing back….
That's because he has nothing to hold.
-
As my wife said, it's a bit like Roderigo calling Iago as a character witness.
-
The irony of O'Sullivan citing Odgers to declare her innocence seems to have escaped her.
-
Hard News: Doing over the witness, in reply to Kumara Republic,
Wake up or cover up?
-
Fran pretends to have grown a spine but I seem to recall a few anti-Feeley articles under her byline...
-
Hard News: Friday Music: Cilla!, in reply to Joe Wylie,
Guy Peellaert’s Cilla.
My sister had a copy of that book, Rock Dreams which fascinated me. I knew most of the images were pure fantasy but they felt real in a way that a photo would not.
-
Hard News: Doing over the witness, in reply to Marc C,
Unless submitters have a competent legal representative, a consultant, an expert witness or lawyer acting for them, going through the complex, highly bureaucratic, legalistic bits of the PAUP and proposed changes, they are basically “stuffed”.
It's the same with the RMA "Boards of Inquiry", especially around the Roads of Notional Importance (Basin flyover being the notable exception). No lawyer means they pretty much ignore you except to tick the box that say "this many members of the public presented submissions so hurrah! consultation".
