Hard News: Herself's Turn
171 Responses
First ←Older Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Newer→ Last
-
And getting back on topic ...
As to keeping kids in school till 18 - let's have the substance. Are schools going to get ever-larger? As they aim to bring down teacher student ratios as well, where are all the extras going to be housed? Will there be meaningful, properly-resourced, alternative programmes for ADHD, Asperger's, autistic kids? Will there at last be full-on literacy programmes for those who still can't read & comprehend well at 3rd form level? Will the load fall on teachers or are there going to be more specialists - mentors, youth workers, tradespeople?
One day we might actually give students what they need rather than what we think they should have, no matter how ill-fitting the garment.
Cruel but fair, Kerry. There's obvious mileage for Labour in getting positive notices from the EMA for funding more industry training, and for Key appeal to concern about youth crime, but there was nothing of the above in either speech. Just more of the same ... only better. I think I should have been more pissed-off in tone this morning.
There's an ample empirical case to be made for this. People on the autistic spectrum wind up disproportionately in prison, or dependent on the health and welfare systems. We know that intervention in childhood and adolescence pays off richly. A good deal is known about the problems faced by AS kids in schools; almost nothing has been done here to address them.
For diagnosed AS alone, we're talking about as many as 1 in 100 kids. It's not trivial.
-
Somewhere along the way I noted that we'd survived many National governments in the past ...
I believe I even had the odd good night out.
& that Key was highly unlikely to affect the fall of Western Civilisation.
Did you mean "effect" -- or is there something you're not telling us?
-
There's obvious mileage for Labour in getting positive notices from the EMA for funding more industry training, and for Key appeal to concern about youth crime, but there was nothing of the above in either speech.
ITA - and the more I look at both speeches, the more I hear the clicking of focus-grouped, poll-tested warm fuzzies falling into place with mechanical precision. Kerry asked some damn good questions, and what a shame I've just listened to Checkpoint over the last twenty fours hours where they weren't asked - let alone answered - of either Key or Clark.
That disturbs me, because I don't think you and Fiona are the only people looking for some answers that aren't going to fit into a soundbite. (But it's good to see the really important questions are being covered: Like Clark's claim that National has a 'secret agenda', and Key replying 'bite me, bimbo.' I made that last bit up, but wish he had.)
-
The more I think about the idea of compulsory education up to the age of eighteen the more I think it's utterly terrible. I really can't see what the perceived benefit of the idea is. If they're engaged they'll stay anyway. If they're not engaged then it's just two more years practice in switching the brain off.
-
And here's a Kōan to mull over, courtesy of Herself:
If Helen Clark keeps banging on about National's secret agenda, is it really a secret agenda at all?
-
And here's a Kōan to mull over
What's a "Koan"? I could google it I suppose, but it'd be nice if someone could explain its meaning.
-
Final word: I probably qualify as a tribal Labour voter, but I'm not as horrified as some people by the possibility of a change of government.
I'd be a lot more comfortable if it was English in charge and worthless 90s turds like Williamson were long gone.
And as for poor-taste images and two-faced whiners, one need not wonder too hard what the reaction would be if David Farrar's local giant billboard with a pic of Mao and a suggestion the Greens are _just like him_ was, say, Mussolini and Rodney Hide, or Goebbels and Tony Ryall.
-
I spelt Bjoerk correctly. She has an umlaut in her name - therefore "oe" is correct and "o" is not. Philistine.
-
I spelt Bjoerk correctly. She has an umlaut in her name - therefore "oe" is correct and "o" is not. Philistine.
-
What's a "Koan"? ... it'd be nice if someone could explain its meaning.
But then it would no longer be a koan, grasshopper.
Unless, possibly, no-one were to read the explanation. -
What's a "Koan"? I could google it I suppose, but it'd be nice if someone could explain its meaning.
"Two hands clap and there is a sound; what is the sound of one hand?" is a famous (if usually bastardised) kōan. Very basically, they're stories, dialogues, questions, or statements that serve a number of functions in the practice of Zen Buddhism. Sometimes they are focal points for meditation and other activities; records of the insights and experiences of masters (along with a rich and complex literature of commentary and interpretation); or ways to confound old habits of thought and shock the mind into awareness.
Outside Zen, these are often assumed to be riddles, unanswerable questions or meaningless statements. That's not true, but they're not opened in the same way as a syllogism in Logic 101.
(Knowing PAS, I wouldn't be surprised if there's a Zen Buddhist lurking out there. Please feel free to chime in if I'm totally FUBARing your spiritual tradition.)
Anyhow, I guess a joke that had to be explained at this length isn't a very good one. But traditional Western logic isn't making sense of Helen Clark's 'I know National's secret agenda' line. But I guess, when all else fails scare the living shit out of those wobblies.
-
And as for poor-taste images and two-faced whiners, one need not wonder too hard what the reaction would be if David Farrar's local giant billboard with a pic of Mao and a suggestion the Greens are _just like him_ was, say, Mussolini and Rodney Hide, or Goebbels and Tony Ryall.
Just you wait, rodgerd. I'm sure you're going to get an answer sooner rather than later; though if we get through this electoral without certain folks who should know better predicting race war in the streets if National wins, that's an improvement.
-
What do's Philistine mean?
is country between teh westpac bank and teh gazza stripe.
-
Did you mean "effect" -- or is there something you're not telling us?
I meant "effect". Bugger
-
Juha sez that the vowel isn't the main event in the pronunciation of "Bjork" -- it's the "r".
It's hard to convey here, but you "land on the r" when you say it. David Slack got better at it with every additional beer at the BDO.
Also, not many people know that Bjork invented the umlaut in 1970.
-
The more I think about the Key and Clark "youth announcements" the more I think it's humbug.
Both seem to share an assumption that "yoof" are property of the state and should be denied the opportunity to make independent decisions.
Both seem to think that if 11 years of compulsory education didn't do the trick, then 13 will.
Neither seems to think at all about what this means for teachers and, um, students who actually want to be at school and, y'know, learn something. (Although I recognize that "school" in its conventional sense is not going to be the only option for those aged 16-18 ... but clearly it's one of them). My high school became a lot more pleasant when a significant proportion of those who didn't want to be there left upon reaching the leaving-age.
Neither of them appears to have talked to a young person in preparing their talking points/policy. Not even one. Kudos to Russell Norman for pointing this out on Morning Report today (I think it was him ... I was still half-asleep).
-
The more I think about the Key and Clark "youth announcements" the more I think it's humbug.
To be fair to both,aI sheaf of speech notes may well be the beginning of a substantive and well-thought out policy that you may not totally agree with, but can at least see the logic of.
But I'm really not feeling over confident. The more I look at both speeches, the more flimsy they become.
-
The more I think about the Key and Clark "youth announcements" the more I think it's humbug.
I don't think they're humbug as such, I'm sure Key and Clark are fairly serious about them and will babble on about them now and again 'til election day.
But in terms of the big picture, it's merely the equivalent of the first tentative punches in a boxing match, or the first scrum in a rugby game. Both parties are just seeing what sort of form the other's in before trying to land the heavy blows, or spinning the ball wide with the major policies on education, welfare, health, etc.
So far, they've both fended off a few jabs or kicked to touch, but not much else. (I will no shut up with my lame sports comparisions).
-
Craig - thanks for explaining what a "koan" is.
-
I may have pointed this out before, but Bjork sounds amazingly like Little Jimmy Osmond, a lot of the time.
-
Philistine.
Strangely enough, the WIkipedia article on the Ö character, the 'oe' substitution is only mentioned as a possibility in German. It's specifically exculded for Swedish, Finnish, Karelian, Estonian, Hungarian, Azeri, Turkish and Crimean Tatar alphabets, where you would use 'o'. It doesn't specifically mention what one does in connection with Icelandic; perhaps up until Björk nobody ever tried but I'll wager it's 'o'.
Philistine.
That said, we don't have a limited character set - in principle we could learn to use our unicode capabilities.
-
Oh, and you can hear Björk's name pronounced on her WIkipedia entry.
-
Craig - thanks for explaining what a "koan" is.
No, thank you for the reminder that being too clever for your own good is really dumb. :)
-
But I'm really not feeling over confident. The more I look at both speeches, the more flimsy they become.
It was interesting to get both parties pronouncing on the same policy area in close succession, and in January too, so there wasn't much else (apart from a youth crime wave, apparently) going on to muddy the waters. It's going to get messier, and not necessarily comparing apples with apples that often.
For me it was a points decision for Key. I don't think throwing young people at the military is going to work for many of them, but I liked at least an attempt to move the ambulance further up the cliff. If there's a variety of options for kids that are struggling to be put into, then I could see it having a positive effect. Not perfect, but maybe 6 or 7/10.
Clark on the other hand - all I saw was the ambulance still sitting at the bottom of the cliff, but the cliff getting bigger by two years. It seemed like more money going into it, but no creative thinking. 4/10 at best.
-
LOL
Well consistency is the key. I'll bear it in mind next time I blog about those other great umlauted acts, like Motoerhead and Spineal Tap. :oP
Post your response…
This topic is closed.