Access by Various artists

Read Post

Access: Right to die?

135 Responses

First ←Older Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Newer→ Last

  • steven crawford, in reply to Sacha,

    The court rulling is at least, precise.

    Atlantis • Since Nov 2006 • 4306 posts Report Reply

  • Rosemary McDonald,

    http://philippatston.com/blog/

    Phillip Patson's views....

    Waikato, or on the road • Since Apr 2014 • 1344 posts Report Reply

  • Rosemary McDonald,

    And doctors decide " there will be no life support, as it would only prolong his suffering."

    while the parents of this brain injured little boy ...

    ... have learned to take medical judgments about William with a grain of salt. Doctors said he would probably need to eat through a tube in his stomach, but that is not the case. He sometimes appears to react to sounds or follow faces with his eyes, despite tests confirming him as completely deaf and blind.

    Day by day, they work to improve his strength and expand his little world as much as they can.

    "He has this strong presence and we still enjoy spending our time with our boy."

    It is a battle out there...

    Waikato, or on the road • Since Apr 2014 • 1344 posts Report Reply

  • Rosemary McDonald, in reply to Rosemary McDonald,

    Waikato, or on the road • Since Apr 2014 • 1344 posts Report Reply

  • Rosemary McDonald,

    Waikato, or on the road • Since Apr 2014 • 1344 posts Report Reply

  • Rosemary McDonald,

    With submissions due in on this issue on the 1st February 2016...

    http://www.parliament.nz/en-nz/pb/sc/make-submission/0SCHE_SCF_51DBHOH_PET63268_1/petition-of-hon-maryan-street-and-8974-others

    and Andrew Geddis encouraging folk to participate....http://pundit.co.nz/content/aid-in-dying-time-to-do-something

    is it time to have another exchange of ideas on this issue?

    Or has it all been said?

    The battle lines have formed, and really...what is the fucking point because this government will be only too happy to pass a law that enables those wearied by the daily battle for survival in a disability hostile system to opt out.

    Part of me says.... make a submission

    But another part of me, the realistic, battle fatigued part of me believes it is not worth the energy input.

    This government hates non ACC disabled.

    Hates those who are battling cancer, mental illness and other significant medical issues.

    If I had the time I would link to the dozens of MSM articles, the dozens of givealittle pages...all describing how the current government has created an environment where the disabled, sick and dying are being forced into circumstances that make them just want to get the whole thing over with.

    Better off dead.

    Waikato, or on the road • Since Apr 2014 • 1344 posts Report Reply

  • Rosemary McDonald,

    And here is a Natrad interview with Lecretia Seales' lawyer

    Very interesting, and Kim Hill does try to raise the issue of how this legislation could affect the public perception of those with disabilities.

    AND....as if we didn't already know....NZBORA isn't worth shit.

    Waikato, or on the road • Since Apr 2014 • 1344 posts Report Reply

  • walrus, in reply to Rosemary McDonald,

    Make a submission, because you can see it a lot more clearly than most. It's a headache for me because I can see the situation you describe happening to me... but I can also see a future in which I no longer have the strength to arrange my own death in any way that is acceptable to me (eg directing my power chair off the end of a wharf is not acceptable to me). But damn it, we SHOULD have a society in which it is possible to choose between dying in a dignified manner and continuing to live with all the support necessary to make that LIFE dignified. When a politician puts up a 'Life with Dignity' bill, perhaps with the death part as coda, s/he'll have my respect.

    Auckland • Since Jan 2015 • 13 posts Report Reply

  • Sacha,

    Morgan Foundation GM Geoff Simmons shows what can happen to otherwise smart people's arguments on topics like this:

    The opponents of assisted dying have offered several arguments to back up their case, but none of them are logical and evidence-based.

    All that remains is their belief in the sanctity of life, or an arrogant belief that experiencing a natural death is good for the patient and their family. These are spiritual beliefs held by a few people, and are not good reasons to rob people like Lecretia Seales of the right to choose how they die.

    When research about the impact on disabled people is funded (because we're worth it), he might have some 'evidence' to compare.

    Ak • Since May 2008 • 19680 posts Report Reply

  • Sacha,

    I am glad to see that the Green Party's succinct policy on Medically-Assisted Dying released today recognises the issues about disability.
    - Media release.
    - One page policy PDF.

    “Adults with a terminal illness should have the right to choose a medically assisted death,” Green Party health spokesperson Kevin Hague said.

    “The Green Party does not support extending assisted dying to people who aren't terminally ill because we can’t be confident that this won't further marginalise the lives of people with disabilities.

    Ak • Since May 2008 • 19680 posts Report Reply

First ←Older Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Newer→ Last

Post your response…

Please sign in using your Public Address credentials…

Login

You may also create an account or retrieve your password.