Hard News: Reassure Me: cannabis, polling and deliberative democracy
34 Responses
First ←Older Page 1 2 Newer→ Last
-
You dry it out and shred it, or roll it into cigars.
But yes, as with most tastes, people probably lock into favourites and would sorely miss all the yummy additives that are in commercial tobacco.
-
Joe Wylie, in reply to
...people probably lock into favourites and would sorely miss all the yummy additives that are in commercial tobacco.
While cigarettes are commonly laced with additives to promote even burning, the last I looked these weren't common in rolling tobacco. Of course there's the odd horror like Port Royal, which is probably great if you like RTDs. The flavours that make tobacco palatable mostly come from slow oxidation in the curing process. Attempting to oven-dry the stuff a la cannabis produces a lung-wrecking nasty that, if it weren't for the addictive properties of nicotine, would put anyone off tobacco for life.
-
BenWilson, in reply to
Yes, the concept of there being any level of refinement in the taste of tobacco smoke is something I have to take people’s word for, but I would pretty strongly suspect that acclimatization is a very big part of it. But we digress – I think it’s true that cannabis would be easier to grow and usefully harvest than tobacco, and there would probably be an initial flurry of interest after legalization, until mass produced volumes undermined the return from growing your own for all but hobbyists. The plant would probably end up, like tobacco, growing everywhere as a weed, but preferences would lock in on particular cultivars. It would soon stop being cool when it was neither uncommon nor rebellious to have, and the mucking around with a garden would end up being something old people like me would bore people talking about. Probably it would be next to the sage and rosemary in the gardens of old ladies with rheumatism, or in huge plantations.
ETA: It's quite likely, IMHO, that smoking it at all would end up being far less common, at which point the whole thing of drying it out would fall by the wayside. For pain it would probably be eaten, and for recreation, vaporized. Both are much healthier than inhaling hot smoke.
-
Russell Brown, in reply to
ETA: It’s quite likely, IMHO, that smoking it at all would end up being far less common, at which point the whole thing of drying it out would fall by the wayside. For pain it would probably be eaten, and for recreation, vaporized. Both are much healthier than inhaling hot smoke.
I think so, especially as vaporisers get better and cheaper. I'm not sure about the way some jurisdictions aren't allowing concentrates for that reason.
-
BenWilson, in reply to
I’m not sure about the way some jurisdictions aren’t allowing concentrates for that reason.
If the plant itself is legal, then concentrates are somewhat less of a high priority. Yes, of course they are more efficient, but they are also more...concentrated. I guess once doses are well controlled and understood that's less problematic, but people getting mega wasted as their first experience doesn't seem like a good idea. The main impediment to good portable vaporizers that simply take the herb itself is that it's not legal to carry the herb, or anything clearly used for taking it. If that changes, then a slower process for the introduction of concentrates doesn't seem like a dreadful thing.
-
Ian Dalziel, in reply to
I’m not sure about the way some jurisdictions aren’t allowing concentrates for that reason.
Overheard, Auckland 2025:
"Have you seen the price of cold-pressed cannabis oil at Farro?!"
"I know!*
Those plantation riots at Ruatoria really ramped up the market
- and they're still restoring the rail link "*using the KimHillSottoVox© App
-
Russell Brown, in reply to
but people getting mega wasted as their first experience doesn’t seem like a good idea.
Yeah, I know of one cannabis activist with a very prodigious capacity for consuming it who was knocked over by his first try of shatter. You only need a very little bit.
-
BenWilson, in reply to
You only need a very little bit.
A very experienced user will probably be accustomed to getting a dosage far beyond what they actually wanted (I don't want to say overdose because that implies toxicity, which is not quite the same thing), and have some inkling that time will probably get them back down, whereas a first timer going sky high is likely to have a very bad trip, scaring the daylights out of them.
-
A fascinating Jim Mora interview here with Amanda Jones PhD, MSc, the kiwi ex-pat entrepreneur at the leading edge of the medicinal cannabis industry in California: https://www.radionz.co.nz/audio/player?audio_id=2018661684
Post your response…
This topic is closed.