Hard News by Russell Brown

Read Post

Hard News: Budget 2011: While you wait

63 Responses

First ←Older Page 1 2 3 Newer→ Last

  • Russell Brown,

    Just getting it on the System ...

    Auckland • Since Nov 2006 • 18969 posts Report Reply

  • Idiot Savant,

    So, how bad can the bad news be?

    Palmerston North • Since Nov 2006 • 1660 posts Report Reply

  • Sacha,

    Murray McCully's squeeze says everyone will hurt; perhaps presages some of the associated talking points from the government.

    The Listener's political columnist Jane Clifton thinks there probably won't be a person left in the country not adversely affected by today's Budget.

    ...

    Ms Clifton says the difficulty for Labour is what the alternative is because the tax increases it's suggesting are aimed at people who are not wealthy in reality.

    "It got into trouble when it was in Government for just that reason because what it deemed the wealthy income earners are actually mostly wage slaves like doctors, plumbers, teachers, nurses, police officers and so on," she told Newstalk ZB's Mike Hosking.

    Ak • Since May 2008 • 16771 posts Report Reply

  • Sacha,

    Cunliffe graphs the composition of the deficit for the last few years. Worth a look.

    When we look at the GDP growth forecasts vs reality for the same period, the answer becomes clear. Every year, National has projected that a return to strong growth is just around the corner which will mean more tax take, lower benefit costs – and a smaller deficit. But it hasn’t eventuated.

    Ak • Since May 2008 • 16771 posts Report Reply

  • Sacha,

    And the second graph on this associated post is quite chilling.

    Ak • Since May 2008 • 16771 posts Report Reply

  • Idiot Savant, in reply to Sacha,

    And the second graph on this associated post is quite chilling.

    So basically, we could eliminate Treasury and replace it with an Excel script to generate a "good times just around the corner, growth return to 2.5% track" scenario, and save ourselves a pile of money.

    Palmerston North • Since Nov 2006 • 1660 posts Report Reply

  • Jimmy Southgate, in reply to Sacha,

    the wealthy income earners are actually mostly wage slaves like doctors, plumbers, teachers, nurses, police officers and so on," she told Newstalk ZB's Mike Hosking

    Doctors aren't exactly the sort of people normally associated with being a wage slave are they? I haven't met many poor ones.

    Wellingtown • Since Nov 2006 • 100 posts Report Reply

  • Russell Brown, in reply to Sacha,

    And the second graph on this associated post is quite chilling.

    Far out.

    Auckland • Since Nov 2006 • 18969 posts Report Reply

  • Idiot Savant, in reply to Jimmy Southgate,

    Doctors aren't exactly the sort of people normally associated with being a wage slave are they? I haven't met many poor ones.

    Likewise, Nurses tend not to earn $70,000 a year. And the teachers pay scale tops out at $69,000.

    In other words, more lies to make them seem like us.

    Palmerston North • Since Nov 2006 • 1660 posts Report Reply

  • Sacha, in reply to Jimmy Southgate,

    Doctors aren't exactly the sort of people normally associated with being a wage slave are they?

    Distorted expectations - the Thorndon bubble strikes again..

    Ak • Since May 2008 • 16771 posts Report Reply

  • Sacha, in reply to Russell Brown,

    Far out.

    You can see why Brash, Douglas and co are saying this government is not being bold enough, too.

    Ak • Since May 2008 • 16771 posts Report Reply

  • BlairMacca,

    There’s not too many nurses, teachers and police officers that would earn over $100,000. My wife is a senior nurse manager and while she does earn a good income, its not over $100,000

    Wellington • Since Apr 2007 • 201 posts Report Reply

  • Idiot Savant,

    Oh, but primary school teachers can top out (after 7 years) at $71,000. And the net ffect of Labour's top tax-rate on them was about $60 a year. Quelle horreur!

    Palmerston North • Since Nov 2006 • 1660 posts Report Reply

  • Rob Stowell,

    National- and all the 'budget-cutting' govts- always seem to seriously under-estimate (or completely ignore) the compounding effects cutting govt spending has on the over-all economy.
    Back when ruthless Ruth was at the helm, I remember seeing a break-down of some of the cuts- and for every dollar of govt spending cut, after calculating lost tax revenue and lost economic activity, it 'saved' the govt (at best) about 25c (in some cases, it had an over-all negative impact on the govt books, where job losses took people from tax-payers to beneficiaries.)
    I suspect this will be a zero-growth budget- clearly accompanied by forecasts of growth plucked out of the air. Zero-to-negative growth, with a big serving of no-ideas-at-all.
    And that's just from what National have already said.

    Whakaraupo • Since Nov 2006 • 1574 posts Report Reply

  • Craig Ranapia,

    I better get my mound of headless, exsanguinated kittens or else. You have been warned, English.

    North Shore, Auckland • Since Nov 2006 • 12034 posts Report Reply

  • Sacha, in reply to Idiot Savant,

    we could eliminate Treasury and replace it with an Excel script

    Be interesting to see if yet again they escape the budget cuts to all other departments.

    Ak • Since May 2008 • 16771 posts Report Reply

  • Sacha, in reply to Craig Ranapia,

    I better get my mound of headless, exsanguinated kittens or else.

    Brash may have scarfed those backstage already.

    Ak • Since May 2008 • 16771 posts Report Reply

  • Idiot Savant,

    Experienced nurses can get $60K a year, plus overtime, according to the (expired) NZNO MECA. Again, not exactly terrible victims of the top tax-bracket, are they?

    Palmerston North • Since Nov 2006 • 1660 posts Report Reply

  • bmk,

    I would like to see two added tiers to our current regime. Say 39% on over 80k and 45% on over 150k. I can't see this hurting too many nurses, teachers or police. And if people are earning over 150k they can't complain about not having enough money when that would probably be something like 4-5 times the median individual income.

    Since Jun 2010 • 323 posts Report Reply

  • James Butler, in reply to Sacha,

    I better get my mound of headless, exsanguinated kittens or else.

    Brash may have scarfed those backstage already.

    Well, duh, that's why they're exsanguinated. So hard to secure a supply of human virgins these days.

    Auckland • Since Jan 2009 • 801 posts Report Reply

  • Geoff Lealand,

    It is not so much about squeezing out more tax from those already paying a fair whack but dealing more directly with tax avoidance, especially through devious family trusts. Interesting too, to see the information that came out this week about the low rates of taxation asked of NZ dairy farmers. They probably have family trusts for each cow.

    But I doubt that National would have the courage to tackle this

    Screen & Media Studies, U… • Since Oct 2007 • 2318 posts Report Reply

  • David Hood,

    If they limit to Working For Families to the poorest, but don't do anything about family trusts I could imagine that as a effective talking point- "National are cutting support for middle New Zealand, but leaving it for those whose wealth is hidden in family trusts". Of course, to mount this argument, Labour would probably need to be prepared to do something about family trusts, and I don't really see that as likely.

    Dunedin • Since May 2007 • 902 posts Report Reply

  • Sacha, in reply to Geoff Lealand,

    the low rates of taxation asked of NZ dairy farmers

    Comprehensive discussion about that at Bernard Hickey's place.

    Ak • Since May 2008 • 16771 posts Report Reply

  • Islander, in reply to Jimmy Southgate,

    Depends on what the doctor does...I know 3 - 2 GPs (one a trauma specialist, & the other with 3 advanced qualifications), and the 3rd an opthalmologist-surgeon. The last makes over double the GPs' income. And works about half the hours they do.

    The GPs make well over $250,000 - gross. There is the small matter of practice costs
    to be considered. And I'd hate to be carrying their mortgage burdens...

    Big O, Mahitahi, Te Wahi … • Since Feb 2007 • 5643 posts Report Reply

  • Steve Barnes,

    I can see this budget being a "Do nothing but shift the deckchairs" budget. What we will get will be financially neutral and achieve nothing in itself. What will happen though is a big spike in inflation which will, in turn, effectively lower Government expenditure. Wages will rise but then so will the cost of living, the Dollar will drop in value compared to Asian and European currencies but continue to gain over the US Dollar ensuring an increase in fuel prices over an extended period.
    This is great for those with large mortgages as the real cost of repaying that mortgage will be eaten up by inflation. However, this will lead to more expensive borrowing for businesses and GDP will stagnate or fall and our overseas debt will continue to rise.
    Fail.
    2c worth.

    The wireless north ;-) • Since Dec 2006 • 4896 posts Report Reply

First ←Older Page 1 2 3 Newer→ Last

Post your response…

Please sign in using your Public Address credentials…

Login

You may also create an account or retrieve your password.