Speaker: Confessions of an Uber Driver II: How we doing?
615 Responses
First ←Older Page 1 … 10 11 12 13 14 … 25 Newer→ Last
-
BenWilson, in reply to
Yup, no references required. Hell, they even hired me!
-
Sacha, in reply to
Not sure how they feel about that now :)
-
goforit, in reply to
Ben I bet they are regretting hiring you now. lol
-
izogi, in reply to
John Campbell also covered the tax situation tonight, having a short interview with Terry Baucher (a tax consultant).
One short passage that caught my notice, though, was that according to Mr Baucher there apparently is an Uber New Zealand... which receives some kind of marketing payment from the web of overseas companies that shift money between tax regimes. I don't know what implications this might have for legal liability of encouraging lawbreaking. Possibly not much.
-
goforit, in reply to
Hi all, has anyone else since the owner of the NZ Herald became a share holder of Uber the news reporting of negative happenings to Uber in NZ is some what restricted.
NZ Stuff reports in a more balanced manner. -
Alfie, in reply to
...NZ Herald became a share holder of Uber...
Hmmm. That might explain this blatant Uber promo in today's Herald.
-
…NZ Herald became a share holder of Uber…
Do you have documentation of this or is it something a cabbie told you??
-
Its documented, look up Murdoch/Uber on goggle, he became a share holder about 6 months ago.
-
Doesn't really explain why the Herald has run many articles pointing out bitterness on Uber, tax dodginess etc. Sure they run some infomercials but that doesn't make them partisan.
-
I don't know what the media fascination with Uber is all about really. I think some of it is because media people are heavy Uber users. News is about themselves again? There's probably a sense of a kindred industry wherein the battle to survive against people who are almost doing it for free is poignant for them.
-
Here we are undercutting the hell out of them. And it's much higher quality in many cases. Because citizen journalists aren't constrained to making a buck, they can pick their stories and go as hard as they like. How can anyone compete that? Everyone is looking for the new economy that actually works, and perhaps they found it in Uber.
Certainly Uber does a good job on the propaganda that they have changed the business model. But in fact it's not a new service, basically a taxi, and what is new is simply the efficient delivery and effective labour exploitation. They don't really ride share at all. And carpooling is not a new idea anyway. The fact is that no one (including Uber) has really got it to work is mostly an inherent limitation of the idea of carpooling, present since the time of wagons. It's fundamentally nowhere near as customer friendly as a taxi, because passengers are now subject to the whims of other passengers.
So finding that the new economy actually doesn't exist in the case of Uber, any more than it does for journalism, is perhaps confirming in some way. I think it's a story that they want to tell anyway, however much everyone is still catching Ubers.
-
Ian Dalziel, in reply to
from the rank file...
mostly an inherent limitation of the idea of carpooling,
for diverse transport solutions - before Uber there was Cuba...
http://locallysourcedcuba.com/cuba-taxi -
all paid transport is ride share, can be taxi, private hire, bus, train etc. Car pooling is another concept, basicly a do gooder giving some a lift going in the same direction for a peyment towards running costs, definaly not for profit
-
goforit, in reply to
in other words ride sharing is sharing a ride with the driver
-
Rich of Observationz, in reply to
Murdoch doesn't own the Herald
-
he is a major share holder of I think its APL and they own the Herald
-
goforit, in reply to
APN that should have read
-
-
goforit, in reply to
sums it up nicely
-
BenWilson, in reply to
He's the man!
-
Russell Brown, in reply to
Its documented, look up Murdoch/Uber on goggle, he became a share holder about 6 months ago.
Recode reported that he owns a small stake, perhaps 0.5%, through an investment vehicle.
He owns 15% of APN, which he bought into last year. But APN is floating NZME, the local vehicle that includes the Herald and The Radio Network – it really wants ou of NZ.. It’s possible that Murdoch could step in and pick up more of NZME as APN shareholders let go their NZME shares, but far from certain.
Anyway, I think the possibility that Murdoch has been directly influencing Herald coverage of Uber is beyond remote. NZME has other things to worry about, like the prospect of merging with Fairfax NZ.
It’s a different story at the Huffington Post, whose editor in chief Ariana Huffington is now on Uber’s board – there have been claims that she killed a HuffPo story that was critical of Uber.
-
Ian Dalziel, in reply to
It’s possible that Murdoch could step in and pick up more of NZME as APN shareholders let go their NZME shares
...if that upping the ante-elopement goes ahead in leaps and bounds (like a stalling taxi service?) they could rename their flagship The News Eland Herald - a beira of bad tidings as they don't always dot their 'i's and cross their 't's - a daily gazelle if you will...
:- )(gets coat...)
-
linger, in reply to
Ariana Huffington is now on Uber’s board
Exploiting workers for profit is her favourite business model, after all.
-
BenWilson, in reply to
in other words ride sharing is sharing a ride with the driver
That means the driver is going where you are going. Which is what carpooling is. By "sharing" is meant "sharing the cost of", not "being in the same vehicle as". To call a taxi ride-sharing makes as much sense as calling a cafe "room-sharing", because the cafe has more than just the owner in it. You don't share the cost of the rent with the cafe owner. You pay them for the service of using the room that they are bearing the cost of. "Room sharing" would be having someone back to your house for a coffee, and possibly getting them to bring the coffee.
But Wiki explains this so I don't have to.
-
BenWilson, in reply to
Not sure how they feel about that now :)
and
Ben I bet they are regretting hiring you now. lol
Possibly so. They certainly can’t claim to not know me any more, since I had one of the association members serve Richard Menzies a letter personally inviting them all to a discussion. Apparently, in the “roundtable” meeting, which was for selected drivers to air their grievances, when pressed, many of the Uber staff present would not even give their full names.
But I’m not aiming for them to regret it in the long run. My aim is for it to be of mutual benefit, for a better business model to emerge, one that takes their excellent app but engages with NZ working conditions, processes and pay standards.
I’d hope that it might lead to an organization that is still highly profitable, but doesn’t have the stink of a corporate culture of secrecy and fear that you see when employees are literally too afraid to give staff their names. I actually feel sorry for people who think they are saving the world, but can’t look their own drivers in the face and say their own name. There’s something really wrong with that.
I would never, ever work for a company that made me feel afraid to use my own name when doing my job.
Post your response…
This topic is closed.