I thought he invented it to give it to Woman, in order to make Child :-)
Beer almost certainly invented by women.
But I still think the MSM could take a punt and start representing the poll data in a manner more closely linked to reality.
There is one thing they could, and should, be doing which is incredibly simple: include the undecided/don't know/wouldn't say vote. Making it disappear isn't "dealing with what's there". One of the most interesting things about that last poll, surely, was the rise in the undecided vote. These are the people who will, very probably, decide the election. If the undecided vote is, say, twice the difference between the 'left' and 'right' coalition blocks, that's pretty damn important, AND it makes for an interesting story.
I do not understand why it isn't done.
How about their desire for privacy?
I sort of thought myself into a hole into a hole contemplating this question, because I think there are so many other factors that play into an individual's desire for privacy. How private you want to be is a factor of how hard you have to work to keep yourself safe.
So if you need a more locked-down environment for some aspects of your life, that's always available. I can have open/unlocked accounts on both Facebook and Twitter, and still have Fetlife. For safety reasons, that area of my life needs to not be open to every passing weirdo.
There is a mental exercise I wish social media platform designers would carry out, and it's this. "I am a woman who has just left an abusive relationship. I wish to interact with my friends, and still be safe." Google+ failed that spectacularly. Now it's just that place where Eastern European men I've never met add me to Circles and I can't do shit about it.
So, what is it that people are going to find out about you? That you got wasted before your exams and you weren't "sick" after all? Or that you're queer, or kinky? Where you live so they can stalk you? That you had an abortion, or attempted suicide? Even for teens, the risk factor varies so much.
Even though he’s been cornered on the marriage equality question, carbon tax, and asylum-seekers, Abbott is so keen to ingratiate himself with these kids that he bends his rules:
The jaw-dropping moment for me was when, after the marriage equality question, Abbott said, "Let's have a guy question."
He actually said that. With those words and everything. Let's have a guy question.
if LJ thinks more women should be in power she should join the Liberal Party and “work her way up”
Actually proving her point, as this is demonstrably not possible for a woman in the Liberal Party.
How does it look to them? I’m curious if this hyperconnectedness is something people born to it actually complain about.
This is a complicated question. Well, it's a complicated answer. Are they aware of the drawbacks? Some. Are they particularly worried about them? No. They have yet to have a potential employer go through their social media postings. We've had some issues with bullying which was over social media, but they don't associate that with the technology. Why would they? It's just like talking.
My feeling is that their expectation of privacy is much lower, and that's just the way it is.
But. My kids are also very tech-y, even for their age group. My son's obsessed with quantum computing. For my daughter, texting and social media help remove some of the communication barriers from her hearing impairment.
Whilst older generations may have built the internet, I think X-generation can at least lay a claim to probably having built most of the World Wide Web, and I sure didn’t have me one of those back then.
My 18 year old son hangs out with us and our friends of a Saturday night, and plays board games and drinks gin with us and joins in our conversations. Last weekend we were talking about how, actually, it was our parents who were promised jet-packs, that old joke aside. Our futuristic literature promised us a bleak Cyberpunk dystopia, and boy have we been working on it. We asked Kieran what he'd been promised, and his immediate unconsidered reply was "VR".
His generation takes utterly for granted the increased connectivity the net brought me and Ben and our lot. That stops being a positive and is just impossible to imagine the lack of. He spends all his nights with his friends - on Skype. What they're having to grapple with is over-connectivity, the invasiveness, the lack of privacy. The permanent record of every dumb thing they've ever said or done. The same thing can look quite different depending on when you came in.
Obvious answer: because most of them aren’t legally allowed to. The law tells them at a crucial time that their political views don’t count. Is it any wonder they react accordingly?
Voting age is one of those things we need to be challenged on, because while it seems quite natural if you don't think about it, it's actually bloody hard to justify, particularly if you're actually talking to one of the people you'd have to tell you don't think they're responsible enough. "It's an arbitrary line. We have to draw it somewhere. Why not 17? Because... Shut up, that's why."
I’m reposting because every part of this is Finn’s own work, his passion, his action that made it happen.
That's fantastic, Hebe.
Things are tough now but that is nothing new, what is new is the middle class, middle aged moaning about how everything has gone to the dogs but it isn’t their fault and they are reluctant to do anything about it.
Raymond, my mother was born in 1928. She got the Depression, and then World War II for her teenage years. That period was way rougher than anything my kids have encountered. But it stopped. And also, her parents went through it with her.
I'm talking about us creating an ongoing, long-term situation of pollution damage and resource scarcity, and leaving our kids to deal with the worst of it. This generation, for the first time, has a shorter life-expectancy than their parents.
And no. Middle-aged middle-class moaning isn't new either. It's been around as long as there's been a middle-class.
Fruit in curries was quite clearly a thing.
It's the consistency of the banana after being cooked for long enough to tenderise stewing steak that freaks me out. It might not be as bad as I imagine. Sometimes I contemplate cooking my way through this book, but I'm just too damn scared.