OnPoint by Keith Ng

Read Post

OnPoint: On Freedom of Speech

326 Responses

First ←Older Page 1 6 7 8 9 10 14 Newer→ Last

  • Danielle,

    But then, Americans are just weird about swearing. I am having to practice some fairly hefty self-censorship.

    We told you! Didn't we tell you? When I said 'twat' in passing in that class discussion, lord, the horrified silence...

    (My FB status updates often include variants of 'goddammit' just to fuck with my American relatives. I am kind of an evil person.)

    Charo World. Cuchi-cuchi!… • Since Nov 2006 • 3828 posts Report

  • Rich Lock,

    I'd recommend you see Kick-Ass some time

    I recommend it, too. but that's because it's one of the best films I've seen in a long time, and it made me laugh like a drain.

    back in the mother countr… • Since Feb 2007 • 2728 posts Report

  • Steve Parks,

    I give you Deborah Hill Cone...

    You can have her back.
    Another "free speech = freedom from being criticised if I say something stupid" argument. Plus a bunch of bizarre observations thrown in.

    Anyone interest in a real example of infringement of free expression should watch The Court Report episode 14 (don't think it’s available online just yet, but should be soon).
    It’s about Valerie Morse, who was convicted and fined $500 for offensive behaviour for setting alight a flag during the ANZAC day dawn service. The appeal is now at the Supreme Court. It isn’t anything like as extreme an example as the one Danyl used on his blog, but it is a legitimate case for concern over free expression.

    Wellington • Since May 2007 • 1165 posts Report

  • Rich Lock,

    Poor Debs doesn't understand

    I think you could probably have just stopped there.

    I do feel (very slightly) bad when I mock the Conester, because it feels like giving a hefty kicking to a yappy puppy*. Also, my mother taught me not to mock the afflicted.

    But she's more or less inviting it on herself with her latest column:

    Freedom of speech is not really freedom if it means you can only say things which are tasteful and respectful and don't offend anyone. I think New Zealand just became a much more oppressive country after the Henry incident.

    What Henry said might have been ill-considered, but it was a lesser evil than every citizen having to calibrate what they say to fit in with the prevailing ethos. Oh, I know we all do this to some extent - it is part of just rubbing along with other people.

    Or, to precis - please feel free to tell me what you think of me to my face, no matter how insulting it is. Because otherwise, the communists have won.

    *For the dog lovers out there, this isn't actually something I have any first-hand knowledge of, 'k?

    back in the mother countr… • Since Feb 2007 • 2728 posts Report

  • Rich Lock,

    WRT the use of the F-bomb and the C-bomb, isn't what they are referring to secondary to how they feel to say/scream/yell.

    They're good, sharp, short, percussive words, with good hard consonants in them at the right place, like most good swearwords are. To a certain extent, what they refer to is incidental to their, um, 'mouth-feel', as it were.

    back in the mother countr… • Since Feb 2007 • 2728 posts Report

  • Kumara Republic,

    I recommend it, too. but that's because it's one of the best films I've seen in a long time, and it made me laugh like a drain.

    And for the ultimate in comedic F-bombs...

    The southernmost capital … • Since Nov 2006 • 5446 posts Report

  • Steve Parks,

    I recommend [Kick Ass], too. but that's because it's one of the best films I've seen in a long time, and it made me laugh like a drain.

    Seconded. (Well, thirded, I suppose.) Funny, great action scenes, and a good moral for the kids too (who couldn’t see it at the cinema, because it was R18).

    WRT the use of the F-bomb and the C-bomb, isn't what they are referring to secondary to how they feel to say/scream/yell.
    They're good, sharp, short, percussive words, with good hard consonants in them at the right place, like most good swearwords are. To a certain extent, what they refer to is incidental to their, um, 'mouth-feel', as it were.

    I agree, although the “not for polite company” nature of the words is also a big factor, otherwise, any utterance with “sharp, short, percussive words, with good hard consonants in them at the right place” would suffice. The gendered nature of the words may be the least important factor, except in as much as that informs how they came to be considered socially taboo.

    Wellington • Since May 2007 • 1165 posts Report

  • Jeremy Eade,

    the mouthfeel - that is great.:)

    auckland • Since Mar 2008 • 1112 posts Report

  • Jeremy Eade,

    In an online business sense Paul Henry should start his own website and take his facebook fans with him.He has enough to make some good money as their urban philisopher, good luck to him.

    He is a wasted talent, the camera loves him. But TV needs more socialists just so we can see what they look like.What do socialists look like?

    TVNZ needs to be completed as a broadcaster, it feels half finished.

    auckland • Since Mar 2008 • 1112 posts Report

  • giovanni tiso,

    What do socialists look like?

    In my experience, they are very handsome.

    Wellington • Since Jun 2007 • 7473 posts Report

  • Megan Wegan,

    I blame the malign influence of the PAS Women's XV who can swear to make a sailor blush, but still suggest you still think a little about gendered insults.

    I do try really hard to stay away from gendered insults, and I reserve the c-word for when I am really angry.(despite, um, the cunt links story.) I even try (and mostly fail) not to use dick and cock. As insults.

    My rule of thumb of offensiveness is not so much the word itself, but how I would feel if it ere directed at me. Which is why it always annoyed me that slut never made it into the BSA's top 20 most offensive words. (It is in the newest iteration (PDF link), but still lower down the list than I'd like.)

    I feel like the C-Bomb, and cock, or cocksucker, lose something of what they mean when they're being used as an insult, but slut, whore, that kind of thing - that's real ladyhate.

    Welly • Since Jul 2008 • 1275 posts Report

  • Craig Ranapia,

    They're good, sharp, short, percussive words, with good hard consonants in them at the right place, like most good swearwords are. To a certain extent, what they refer to is incidental to their, um, 'mouth-feel', as it were.

    So's "gay" -- but my BH's grandnephew (who is a sweetie pie and doesn't have a homophobic cell in his body) has been on the receiving end of *cough* a free, frank and one-sided reading of the riot act the last time he used that as a term of disapprobation within my hearing. If he drops the n-bomb, I'll just slap the little cracker upside the head until his ears ring like a cathedral bell.

    North Shore, Auckland • Since Nov 2006 • 12370 posts Report

  • Jeremy Eade,

    auckland • Since Mar 2008 • 1112 posts Report

  • Carol Stewart,

    So's "gay" -- but my BH's grandnephew (who is a sweetie pie and doesn't have a homophobic cell in his body) has been on the receiving end of *cough* a free, frank and one-sided reading of the riot act the last time he used that as a term of disapprobation within my hearing.

    I maintain a similar campaign with a swarm of 11 year old boys .. she's a hard row to plough.
    I thought the usage of 'gay' in this way was quite a recent thing, but it gets bandied around in David Mitchell's novel Black Swan Green which is set in 1982 England.

    Wellington • Since Jul 2008 • 830 posts Report

  • Jeremy Eade,

    The use of the word "gay" as a new way of saying "tame" is happening everywhere. Gay is a great sounding word, passive, aggressive.

    auckland • Since Mar 2008 • 1112 posts Report

  • Jeremy Eade,

    That's why the kids love these words. They sound great, the mouthfeel....but not being gay I have no idea how much that would fuck a gay person off just hearing that word used negatively in the street.

    auckland • Since Mar 2008 • 1112 posts Report

  • chris,

    I'll just slap the little cracker upside the head until his ears ring like a cathedral bell.

    At a glance, this sentence seems far more borderline wrt NZ FOS limitations than any of the expletives being bandied about. God blessed you Craig.

    Mawkland • Since Jan 2010 • 1302 posts Report

  • Lucy Stewart,

    That's why the kids love these words. They sound great, the mouthfeel....but not being gay I have no idea how much that would fuck a gay person off just hearing that word used negatively in the street.

    I really don't think it requires that big a stretch of the imagination. At all.

    We told you! Didn't we tell you? When I said 'twat' in passing in that class discussion, lord, the horrified silence...

    (My FB status updates often include variants of 'goddammit' just to fuck with my American relatives. I am kind of an evil person.)

    I keep having conversations wherein people apologise for swearing because they said "shit" once, which usually runs so beneath my radar I don't even ping it as swearing until they start apologising. One day I'm going to, I don't know, drop a rack of nearly-boiling test tubes on my foot and then they're all going to get a terrible shock.

    Wellington • Since Nov 2006 • 2105 posts Report

  • Caleb D'Anvers,

    I blame the malign influence of the PAS Women's XV who can swear to make a sailor blush, but still suggest you still think a little about gendered insults.

    Yeah. Gosh, with the list of ladybit- and non-heteronormative-derived taboo words we're cataloguing on this thread, you might think that New Zealanders, as a group of language users, have a bit of a problem with female and non-hetero sexuality. Who would have thought?

    Oddly enough, while reading this, I was also leafing through a memoir by, well, Muriel Box, and came across this quote, which seemed apposite:

    Even now I find it a little difficult to stomach epithets smacking of derision and contempt for sex in its various manifestations. D H Lawrence's gallant attempt in Lady Chatterly's Lover to regenerate certain four-letter Anglo-Saxon words in our language ended in failure. I rather wish it had not. I've often thought it would be amusing to invent some highly-coloured expletives to replace the traditional ones smacking of human excreta, sodomy, buggery, or copulation. Obviously strong, racy language is needed at times to relieve unbearable tensions but children listening to the currently fashionable brand are unfortunately liable to conclude that sex is the epitome of filth, and certain human functions degrading. ("Odd Woman Out," 22)

    London SE16 • Since Mar 2008 • 482 posts Report

  • BenWilson,

    Kids definitely use gay a lot to mean "soft, weak, pathetic, etc". But they don't use other more pejorative terms for gay much, which makes me wonder if it's just the connotation of that exact word. In some ways I think it's a very poor word for homosexual. Not all homosexuals display the qualities that it hints at, many are rough as guts, not particularly happy, very strong etc. But I can't think of too many other words that are better. Queer, fag, poof, queen, etc, all are loaded with imagery of difference, oppression, softness, effeminacy, etc.

    Auckland • Since Nov 2006 • 10657 posts Report

  • giovanni tiso,

    This reminds me of Piergiorgio Paterlini's argument that the hatred for gay men is a subset of the hatred for women - although it's easier to prove using the Italian swear word reportoire.

    Wellington • Since Jun 2007 • 7473 posts Report

  • Jackie Clark,

    blame the malign influence of the PAS Women's XV who can swear to make a sailor blush, but still suggest you still think a little about gendered insults.

    We try our best to please. I just love the word fuck. My father was a great proponent of it. And on a side note, I was never punished for saying any swear word, and we all swore alot but had my mouth washed out for telling my mum to get stuffed. That's just how we Clarks' roll.

    I do try really hard to stay away from gendered insults, and I reserve the c-word for when I am really angry.(despite, um, the cunt links story.) I even try (and mostly fail) not to use dick and cock. As insults.

    The only gendered insults I ever use are cunt, and prick - and I haven't called anyone a cunt to their face for a long time. And never a woman. But if I really hate someone, that is what they are to me. But only if they're a man. It's a hard word, and so apparently sacrosanct that it's the most hateful thing I can say about someone.

    slut, whore, that kind of thing - that's real ladyhate.

    I would never, never, never call someone those names. I have never hated a woman enough to use those words on them. I have, however, called myself a slut. Proudly, really.

    So's "gay" -- but my BH's grandnephew (who is a sweetie pie and doesn't have a homophobic cell in his body) has been on the receiving end of *cough* a free, frank and one-sided reading of the riot act the last time he used that as a term of disapprobation within my hearing.

    Oh, yes, Craig. I just hate the way that kids bandy "gay" around as an insult. Lazy, lazy insult this one. Like calling someone fat. And so potentially damaging.

    Mt Eden, Auckland • Since Nov 2006 • 3136 posts Report

  • Emma Hart,

    That's why the kids love these words. They sound great, the mouthfeel....but not being gay I have no idea how much that would fuck a gay person off just hearing that word used negatively in the street.

    In its pejorative sense, gay is the only word banned in my house. That's the only time I'll have a polite word with one of my son's friends about what comes out of their mouths when they're playing LAN combat games. "Would you call your troops niggers? Then don't call them gay. Same principle."

    Lately I've been reading a lot of vintage detective fiction - Ngaio Marsh, Gladys Mitchell, etc. I love the language, but it can be jolly confusing occasionally when words have changed meaning. I did finally work out that the wife who had "turned gay" had taken a male lover...

    Christchurch • Since Nov 2006 • 4651 posts Report

  • Lucy Stewart,

    I would never, never, never call someone those names. I have never hated a woman enough to use those words on them. I have, however, called myself a slut. Proudly, really.

    One thing I have noticed here, largely due to the whole California governer race dust-up, is that "whore" can be used as a very specific gendered insult for women with no actual reference to sexual promiscuity - i.e., when Jerry Brown's aide called Meg Whitman a whore, he didn't seem to be implying anything about her actual sex life, whereas in New Zealand usage it seemed to be restricted to an actual accusation of sluttitude, if it was used at all - if someone wanted to say that, they'd generally just say slut.

    I find that deeply disturbing, the use of "whore" as a general gendered insult, and I'm not sure why.

    Wellington • Since Nov 2006 • 2105 posts Report

  • Geoff Lealand,

    I am not sure whether this would be considered a freedom of speech issue but this Finnish newsreader did get the sack...;-)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8tgRIaw2Ac

    (Sorry for being such a klutz but I don't seem able to embed Youtube vids here--even my whiz-kid daughter can't figure it out.)

    Screen & Media Studies, U… • Since Oct 2007 • 2562 posts Report

First ←Older Page 1 6 7 8 9 10 14 Newer→ Last

Post your response…

This topic is closed.